J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Zero evidence of this, just speculation.

---

Even more, there's a journalist YouTuber (can't remember the name) that was able to get in contact with one of the dudes who was friends with Robinson/the boyfriend and was in some of their discords. He said the language in the texts looks weird but that's how he would actually talk.

While are certainly question out there, this is bonkers if you really believe this:

Quote:

---

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

---

And there you go again with the strawman:

Quote:

---

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

---

No one said she wasn't within her rights to ask questions about his death.

And some "Friend" she is. Capitalizing off his death like Jessie Jackson rubbing MLK's blood on himself.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

Just stopping by to say anyone who uses Candace's claim that Macron's wife is a dude as evidence of her trustworthiness has basically proven himself to be a conspiracy theorist of the highest order. Y'all can continue debating all you want, but it's obviously going nowhere. Seamaster is the type of person who gives Candace a foothold.

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

---

Sounds good. Thank you for confirming there's no evidence but you "feel" like it's true. Unfortunately for Candace she will likely have to actually prove that she has evidence of her claims in order to avoid losing, or she may end up just going the Alex Jones route and admit she made it up.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

---

Sounds good. Thank you for confirming there's no evidence but you "feel" like it's true. Unfortunately for Candace she will likely have to actually prove that she has evidence of her claims in order to avoid losing, or she may end up just going the Alex Jones route and admit she made it up.

---

How about a bet?

$20.

You bet that Candace loses the lawsuit.

I bet that she wins or the Macrons withdraw it.

Deal?

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

---

Sounds good. Thank you for confirming there's no evidence but you "feel" like it's true. Unfortunately for Candace she will likely have to actually prove that she has evidence of her claims in order to avoid losing, or she may end up just going the Alex Jones route and admit she made it up.

---

How about a bet?

$20.

You bet that Candace loses the lawsuit.

I bet that she wins or the Macrons withdraw it.

Deal?

---

Lol sure, as long as Candace settling privately is also included (my most likely guess as to what ends up happening). But would prefer to just send it to the winner's charity of choice.

BQRyno said:

---

Just stopping by to say anyone who uses Candace's claim that Macron's wife is a dude as evidence of her trustworthiness has basically proven himself to be a conspiracy theorist of the highest order.

---

Im not defending Candace or any outrageous claims, but the term "conspiracy theorist" isnt really an insult or discrediting label anymore.

There have been so many actual conspiracy theories proven true last decade. CIA/FBI coup attempt, COVID lab leak, and so many false flags and conspiratorial gaslighting in between. In all these cases the "conspiracy theorists" were disparaged before being proven correct.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

---

Sounds good. Thank you for confirming there's no evidence but you "feel" like it's true. Unfortunately for Candace she will likely have to actually prove that she has evidence of her claims in order to avoid losing, or she may end up just going the Alex Jones route and admit she made it up.

---

Ok.

Deal.

How about a bet?

$20.

You bet that Candace loses the lawsuit.

I bet that she wins or the Macrons withdraw it.

Deal?

---

Lol sure, as long as Candace settling privately is also included (my most likely guess as to what ends up happening). But would prefer to just send it to the winner's charity of choice.

---

Ok. Deal. Charity of Choice. Loser to post screenshot.

FobTies said:

---

BQRyno said:

---

Just stopping by to say anyone who uses Candace's claim that Macron's wife is a dude as evidence of her trustworthiness has basically proven himself to be a conspiracy theorist of the highest order.

---

Im not defending Candace or any outrageous claims, but the term "conspiracy theorist" isnt really an insult or discrediting label anymore.

There have been so many actual conspiracy theories proven true last decade. CIA/FBI coup attempt, COVID lab leak, and so many false flags and conspiratorial gaslighting in between. In all these cases the "conspiracy theorists" were disparaged before being proven correct.

---

That is a cheap cop out for people who want to believe every single conspiracy theory no matter how outlandish.

And most of the so called "conspiracy theories" you people always list never were actually conspiracy theories. The Democrat/media simply labeled them as such to silence people.

Candace has been wrong about everything she's ever said, with one exception. She's right about dinosaurs. They are most certainly fake and gay.

LMCane said:

---

hmmm... I'm old enough to remember when some on the right were calling out Candace Owens for her insanity and for her claims that Erika Kirk and TPUSA were involved in the murder.

then I'm old enough to remember when the woke right cultists screamed "how dare you attack Candace!"

that was a month ago.

let's see what Candace has to say about it today:

---

Calling TPUSA a "Godforsaken organization" and asking people to request refunds from their donations is quite the leap now. Maybe she is hoping those people will get refunds and funnel them to her.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

---

Sounds good. Thank you for confirming there's no evidence but you "feel" like it's true. Unfortunately for Candace she will likely have to actually prove that she has evidence of her claims in order to avoid losing, or she may end up just going the Alex Jones route and admit she made it up.

---

How about a bet?

$20.

You bet that Candace loses the lawsuit.

I bet that she wins or the Macrons withdraw it.

Deal?

---

Lol sure, as long as Candace settling privately is also included (my most likely guess as to what ends up happening). But would prefer to just send it to the winner's charity of choice.

---

This is a sucker bet. Candace can "win" at the motion to dismiss phase or summary judgment phase by claiming that any reasonable person wouldn't believe anything that comes out of her mouth, and the lawsuit goes away. She "wins," but only because no one should believe anything she says is the truth.

I listed a couple.

I recall specifically being labeled a "conspiracy theorist" for claiming COVID leaked from a lab. This was early on, right around the cancelation of Houston rodeo. The left was also calling us "racists" for that claim. Yes, it leaked from a lab, and Fauci emails proved there was a conspiracy to push wet market leak theory.

Same for the CIA/FBI coup attempt. An actual conspiracy to unseat a POTUS, that got labeled a "debunked conspiracy theory".

Jan 6, Hunter laptop, vaccine alternatives, Ukraine phone call, and so much more.

COVID coming from a lab was pretty obvious. Not quite the same thing as claiming the moon landings were fake, or the numerous contradictory lunatic claims by Candace about Charlie Kirk

Sick lady!

I pointed out several months ago that one of Candace’s key goals, aside from profiting from his death, was to destroy Charlie Kirk’s legacy and organization because she resents how he distanced himself from her…

I hope they sue her. pic.twitter.com/GAh4UOcAUE

— AG (@AGHamilton29) December 2, 2025

Im Gipper said:

---

Sick lady!

I pointed out several months ago that one of Candace’s key goals, aside from profiting from his death, was to destroy Charlie Kirk’s legacy and organization because she resents how he distanced himself from her…

I hope they sue her. pic.twitter.com/GAh4UOcAUE

— AG (@AGHamilton29) December 2, 2025

---

The ***** will never, ever "name names" nor will she "provide evidence."

If pressed to do so, she'll claim she is being threatened and can't do it right now.

HTownAg98 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?

---

I am not going to do the work for you and I don't care if you're convinced or not.

The Macrons are highly unlikely to win the lawsuit simply because in America we have free speech and to prove "defamation" they would have to prove that Candace "knowingly" spread a falsehood about Brigette. Alas, Candace actually believes that Brigette was born a man, hence - no defamation.

For the record, it was French journalists who first uncovered this and did all the investigations and reporting.

But, like I said, I don't care if you believe it or not.

---

So, no evidence. Got it. This is what happens with most conspiracy theorists - any scrutiny and they just fall back on "do your own research," because they know there's no evidence that isn't easily debunked.

And while we have free speech (which only means she won't be arrested for knowingly lying to idiots to get paid) you also can't knowingly spread false defamatory information without consequences, so she's going to either lose or settle.

---

Sorry random internet stranger. I am not able to drop everything and present the totality of evidence that entire books have presented, in France, and numerous journalists (not just Candace) have spent hours presenting.

Because of I am not gonna do that for you, please proceed with thinking there is "no evidence."

---

Sounds good. Thank you for confirming there's no evidence but you "feel" like it's true. Unfortunately for Candace she will likely have to actually prove that she has evidence of her claims in order to avoid losing, or she may end up just going the Alex Jones route and admit she made it up.

---

How about a bet?

$20.

You bet that Candace loses the lawsuit.

I bet that she wins or the Macrons withdraw it.

Deal?

---

Lol sure, as long as Candace settling privately is also included (my most likely guess as to what ends up happening). But would prefer to just send it to the winner's charity of choice.

---

This is a sucker bet. Candace can "win" at the motion to dismiss phase or summary judgment phase by claiming that any reasonable person wouldn't believe anything that comes out of her mouth, and the lawsuit goes away. She "wins," but only because no one should believe anything she says is the truth.

---

Eh, seems like she'd be losing in the spirit of the bet if that happens. But if the outcome ends up being Candace having to admit that no reasonable person should believe what she says because she's lying constantly, a $20 donation to charity is fine with me.

I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children. 4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children. 4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

---

Maybe you should pray for her, to ease the pain of your concern.

IMO she's as trustworthy as anyone else. And her enemies have a many tentacles.
and such fervent critics.

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Completely faked according to who? You? Do you have any evidence to support that whatsoever, or is this just a feeling you have that you're claiming to be fact?

Friends of theirs who hung out at their apartment regularly said the messages sounded real, but I guess your intuition is more credible than people who actually know them and spend time with them. Said Tyler often refers to his bf as "my love", which was in the letter.

The most damning thing for Candace's credibility with regards to the letter is that she said nobody uses the term "vehicle" and she supported that with the video of Tyler during a traffic stop where he used the term "car". But she purposely cut off a portion of the video where he interchangeably did use the term "vehicle" as well. So to keep her grift going with people like you she purposely lied by omission to mislead her low iq audience.

Shes a grifter. Shes milking her supposed friend's death for profit and it's disgusting to anybody with any sense, that excludes you apparently.

Seamaster said:

---

LMCane said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

Be careful of those kind of arguments (italics). Never found them as persuasive as other types. They presume a bit too much. Like the teacher assuming a 20 year old writing like an accomplished archeologist is plagiarizing rather than emulating --doesn't always follow. Will take another look, never did get into them.

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

and when the JURY of 12 Utahns vote to convict Robinson as the murderer-

the Candace cultists will be back here stating there is some other 'grand conspiracy' where Macron paid off the Jury Foreman.

the great thing about being an idiot and gullible is one will believe anything the cult leader tells you.

---

I haven't made up my mind about Kirk and what exactly happened there.

But I do have brain cells and I don't believe everything that's curated and "leaked" for me to see like a good normie neocon.

Do you?

For example, do you believe Epstein killed himself?

---

This is such a lazy tactic used by conspiracy theorists. When they can't rebut info on the argument at hand they just switch gears to a different topic like "well I bet you believe Epstein killed himself too" or "I bet you think Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone shooting jfk".

It's like arguing with a woman. They refuse to stay on any one topic.

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children. 4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

---

Maybe you should pray for her, to ease the pain of your concern.

IMO she's as trustworthy as anyone else. And her enemies have a many tentacles.
and such fervent critics.

---

Candace doesn't have enemies. To have enemies you need to be taken seriously. Everyone who isn't on team Candace fully recognizes that she's become mentally unstable and needs professional help.

Rapier108 said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Sick lady!

I pointed out several months ago that one of Candace’s key goals, aside from profiting from his death, was to destroy Charlie Kirk’s legacy and organization because she resents how he distanced himself from her…

I hope they sue her. pic.twitter.com/GAh4UOcAUE

— AG (@AGHamilton29) December 2, 2025

---

The ***** will never, ever "name names" nor will she "provide evidence."

If pressed to do so, she'll claim she is being threatened and can't do it right now.

---

If you are ever going to set out to do this kind of thing, you should have a kamikaze attitude to start with. Because nothing less than names and especially evidence, will make any difference. Trump understood that. He bore the risk and gunfire (rather literally starting in 2024 but figuratively before).

Rapier108 said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Sick lady!

I pointed out several months ago that one of Candace’s key goals, aside from profiting from his death, was to destroy Charlie Kirk’s legacy and organization because she resents how he distanced himself from her…

I hope they sue her. pic.twitter.com/GAh4UOcAUE

— AG (@AGHamilton29) December 2, 2025

---

The ***** will never, ever "name names" nor will she "provide evidence."

If pressed to do so, she'll claim she is being threatened and can't do it right now.

---

Yup. And her true believers will lap it up as some sort of Mossad assassin group out to get her.

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children. 4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

---

Maybe you should pray for her, to ease the pain of your concern.

IMO she's as trustworthy as anyone else. And her enemies have a many tentacles.
and such fervent critics.

---

Candace doesn't have enemies. To have enemies you need to be taken seriously. Everyone who isn't on team Candace fully recognizes that she's become mentally unstable and needs professional help.

---

When people, like yourself I guess, go to such an effort to call her "mentally unstable," it gives me pause for thought. Nobody ever says, hey go check this nutball out. see what you think. Because you don't want anyone to think for themselves.

If you have two dozen posts here and are constantly dredging up, out of 2 million podcasts, the Candace thread, you may be effectively an enemy of Candace Owens even though she knows nothing of you.. And I don't think Zionists, who do have enemies, are her fans. And I don't think French gov are her fans.

I'm not on "Team Candace," but I like smart women who communicate well. That she is.

Agree to disagree. You think she's smart. I think she's a lunatic.

BQRyno said:

---

Agree to disagree. You think she's smart. I think she's a lunatic.

---

Calling someone crazy to scare people away is an old trick. so is repetition. and this thread is chock full of old tricks.

I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children. 4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

"4 little ones who want her and need her" lol What motivates certain people here to post fake-care crocodile tear garbage like this?

So you're pointing to some people on an internet board being dramatic or hyperbolic as some kind of proof that she's smart and rational? I don't follow that logic. I think she's gonna down an antisemitic and fringe conspiracy theorist path that makes it hard to take her seriously at all. I don't know if the daily wire folks kept her under control or if she went off the deep end after she left, but beginning with her public relationship with Kanye, something seriously changed with her. The absolute best case scenario would be if it was all for clicks and she didn't believe any of it.

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

BQRyno said:

---

Agree to disagree. You think she's smart. I think she's a lunatic.

---

Calling someone crazy to scare people away is an old trick. so is repetition. and this thread is chock full of old tricks.

I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children. 4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

"4 little ones who want her and need her" lol What motivates certain people here to post fake-care crocodile tear garbage like this?

---

Sometimes people are actually lunatics too. Just because it's an ad hominem doesn't mean it's not true. There are plenty intelligent, well-spoken people in this world that lose sight of reality and enter the realm of crazy.

Candace has gone down that rabbit hole.

Kvetch said:

---

...lose sight of reality and enter the realm of crazy.

Candace has gone down that rabbit hole.

---

So it is said here. again and again.

I hopped on this thread because imo somebody used the Lord's name in vain as a smear tactic. I will leave y'all now to rut around in the crazy lunatic, melting-down, in need of professional help Candace Owens rabbit hole.

She's not a lunatic. Far from it. She is highly intelligent and knows there are creepy dudes out there that will lap up everything she says as true because she is pretty when made up and "talks good".

I posted above about how she lied to her audience. What's your defense of that?

She doesn't need anybody's help discrediting herself.