Ghislaine Maxwell moved to Bryan, TX Prison

28,557 Views | 197 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by reineraggie09
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:



Roger Parloff is not a source that can be trusted, especially regarding anything Trump. The guy eats, breathes, and lives for attacking Trump and is what actual TDS looks like.

And "MuellerSheWrote" as a source. Jeez, no bias there. /sarcasm
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Rapier108 said:

Im Gipper said:



Roger Parloff is not a source that can be trusted, especially regarding anything Trump. The guy eats, breathes, and lives for attacking Trump and is what actual TDS looks like.

And "MuellerSheWrote" as a source. Jeez, no bias there. /sarcasm

The fanbois on F16 have put a lot of stock in what Cat Turd has to say, in the not too distant past.
Gig 'Em
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10 said:

Im Gipper said:





She got a good deal from Deep State donald


She will be helping out with hospitality arrangements during recruiting visits?

DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cen-Tex said:

Sq 17 said:

Those statements are true and will set an incomplete narrative and a sex trafficker will be released from jail for helping whitewash Trumps involvement

Biden would have implicated Trump way before G. Maxwell if he was on the list…but didn't


This. I don't understand why folks think there is something incriminating Trump. Would have been used by the Biden administration asap
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
DannyDuberstein said:

Cen-Tex said:

Sq 17 said:

Those statements are true and will set an incomplete narrative and a sex trafficker will be released from jail for helping whitewash Trumps involvement

Biden would have implicated Trump way before G. Maxwell if he was on the list…but didn't


This. I don't understand why folks think there is something incriminating Trump. Would have been used by the Biden administration asap

If only there was a way to prove it once and for all......
Gig 'Em
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proving a negative is tricky, and unlike the simpletons, I don't think there is some magic list
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

Cen-Tex said:

Sq 17 said:

Those statements are true and will set an incomplete narrative and a sex trafficker will be released from jail for helping whitewash Trumps involvement

Biden would have implicated Trump way before G. Maxwell if he was on the list…but didn't


This. I don't understand why folks think there is something incriminating Trump. Would have been used by the Biden administration asap

There is nothing. This is just the latest in a decade long "got him!" effort by the Dems.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Lone Stranger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Which does the einstein brain trust here think is easier for the deep state to take her out? Maximum or Minimum Security Fed Prison? The Bryan homies were running and gunning in the street in that hood the other night but dispersed quickly when the fed guard fired on them.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


G-Max gonna be the new howdy outbound girl.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A lot of hullabaloo over the nothing that once used to be on the AG's desk apparently.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

I think they wanted Trump so bad that any Dems would have been sacrificed if there was any evidence at all that he did something. Biden's lack of any action at all makes it clear that a lot of Dems are mixed up but no Trump. There are likely some Rs too, but none the size of the Dems that are rolled up in this. What I do think has happened here with Trump is that there are a lot of names that didn't do anything wrong beyond rubbing elbows with other rich/famous/powerful, but anyone rolled up in this gets the stigma and ruined forever. What should have happened is prosecution of actual guilty pervs vs a dump. Both have dropped the ball on that.


Those spineless, corrupt ****s want to protect their donors, on both sides.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

Proving a negative is tricky, and unlike the simpletons, I don't think there is some magic list
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

DannyDuberstein said:

Proving a negative is tricky, and unlike the simpletons, I don't think there is some magic list



Actually, proving the negative is the one thing you can do.

We have a presumption of innocence and then we have beyond reasonable doubt. Proving absolute innocence is the tricky part and almost never happens.

Not different than scientific method. You can always add up supportive evidence and make a damn good case. But it only takes one tiny exculpatory item to prove it wrong.

How many "proven scientific facts" have turned out wrong? Particularly when ALL the evidence is hearsay and circumstantial?

Cause that's all they got with Trump. He didn't release the files so he is a deep state mossad agent pedo agent for the British royal family.
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe they may not have proof of any wrongdoing and knowing who was guilty and who was an innocent acquaintance. We know Bill Clinton was there but who will prosecute him? Hillary probably was too.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unless they were serving unborn babies on pizza dough, then Hillary was probably not there.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:



G-Max gonna be the new howdy outbound girl.

I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
lawless89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TyHolden said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:



G-Max gonna be the new howdy outbound girl.




Maybe the new drive thru girl at Hot Dogs Etc right up the road??
Danimal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maga doesn't even care about a massive, government coordinated cover up of child predators. It's insane how fall they've fallen from the values this country was founded upon.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Danimal said:

Maga doesn't even care about a massive, government coordinated cover up of child predators. It's insane how fall they've fallen from the values this country was founded upon.

Acktually, finger waving Bill Clinton and bath house Barry are both currently under investigation.

don't forget that we've know for years now that Bill Clinton went to Epstein Island 26 Times. Did the Xiden administration ever ask him Why?
Danimal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not so fast Donald. This is the real news.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The vast majority of F16 posters have been lamenting the lack of a published list and the entire Epstein suicide fiasco. All I read on here is how Maxwell is at least incarcerated even though no actual clients have ever been named. Go ahead and name me one "MAGA" who is positive on the coverup - I'll wait.

And while I'm waiting loosen your grip a bit or you're going to crack a pearl...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Danimal said:

Not so fast Donald. This is the real news.

What happened?
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Danimal said:

Maga doesn't even care about a massive, government coordinated cover up of child predators. It's insane how fall they've fallen from the values this country was founded upon.


What's also amazing is how snarky snipes like THIS one but only FALL flat, but also fail to spellcheck!


Edit....and autocorrect hoists me on my own petard.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully, this is just normal Jones rubbish


I'm Gipper
Ag98and03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If there is nothing in the file, then let's see it.

Doing stupid stuff like releasing the files on Amelia Earhart just appears....dumb.

If Clinton is on it, let's see it
If Trump is on it, let's see it.
If neither are on it, let's see it.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Remain rather unconvinced there `are' "files" in the conventional sense of some copious dossier kept on everyone involved like something from Rheihard Heydrich's collection that he kept.

Am half-way of the view that they discovered to their embarrassment no such stack of smoking gun papers exist any more if they ever did, and yet they can't figure out how to just come clean about it without looking stupid.

Another half thinks there may be something to all the podcast chatter about connections to Mossad, because if anything would lead to coordinated cover-up by both sides of aisle, its something like that.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let me know when someone reputable reports this.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

Remain rather unconvinced there `are' "files" in the conventional sense of some copious dossier kept on everyone involved like something from Rheihard Heydrich's collection that he kept.

Am half-way of the view that they discovered to their embarrassment no such stack of smoking gun papers exist any more if they ever did, and yet they can't figure out how to just come clean about it without looking stupid.

This is the most likely explanation.

Everyone expects that Epstein had a massive file on everyone and both sides think it will take down their enemies.

Client 1: Likes girls 13-15, blond hair, blue eyes, virgins preferred.
Client 2: Like girls 14-16, brown hair, green eyes, experienced.
Client 3: Likes girls who look like (insert famous celebrity)
Client 4: Likes teenage trans-women. (Sorry, TA blocks the slang word.)
Client 5: Like girls under 15, red hair, blue eyes.

If something like this ever existed, it has been destroyed long ago. The reason it likely never did is because the Democrats would have used it against Republicans on the list, especially Trump, while destroying all evidence which hurt their side.

Many even think there are hundreds of thousands of hours of video he recorded of these men raping underage girls. Again, if they existed, they would have been used against anyone not a Democrat, and the rest destroyed. Some of the biggest Epsteiners even want those videos released, if they exist, which is just disgusting.

Epstein is a dry well at this point. It might cause some smoke, but it will never create the fire so many across the political spectrum want it to.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never forget the Biden FBI & Deep State had 4 years to destroy every bit of evidence incriminating every lefty liberal lunatic of child trafficking and molestation involved with Epstein and his island. Was it any wonder that it sat there for 4 years under Biden and no one was clamoring to get to the bottom of the sickening events surrounding that depraved episode in History?
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She hangs out at Twin Peaks on Tuesday nights…
I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TyHolden said:

She hangs out at Twin Peaks on Tuesday nights…

good one
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

titan said:

Remain rather unconvinced there `are' "files" in the conventional sense of some copious dossier kept on everyone involved like something from Rheihard Heydrich's collection that he kept.

Am half-way of the view that they discovered to their embarrassment no such stack of smoking gun papers exist any more if they ever did, and yet they can't figure out how to just come clean about it without looking stupid.

This is the most likely explanation.

Everyone expects that Epstein had a massive file on everyone and both sides think it will take down their enemies.

Client 1: Likes girls 13-15, blond hair, blue eyes, virgins preferred.
Client 2: Like girls 14-16, brown hair, green eyes, experienced.
Client 3: Likes girls who look like (insert famous celebrity)
Client 4: Likes teenage trans-women. (Sorry, TA blocks the slang word.)
Client 5: Like girls under 15, red hair, blue eyes.

If something like this ever existed, it has been destroyed long ago. The reason it likely never did is because the Democrats would have used it against Republicans on the list, especially Trump, while destroying all evidence which hurt their side.

Many even think there are hundreds of thousands of hours of video he recorded of these men raping underage girls. Again, if they existed, they would have been used against anyone not a Democrat, and the rest destroyed. Some of the biggest Epsteiners even want those videos released, if they exist, which is just disgusting.

Epstein is a dry well at this point. It might cause some smoke, but it will never create the fire so many across the political spectrum want it to.


The problem with this scenario (or set of scenarios) is that it leaves the majority of questions totally unanswered. Including:

1. How did Epstein acquire his wealth? He was allegedly a finance guy but didn't know common stock from chicken stock. Seriously, they never found anyone who had some sort of a trading relationship with a guy who traded to amass millions. Can you explain that?

2. What was Maxwell convicted of? Procuring girls for underage sex, right? For who? Epstein? Epstein was dead when Maxwell was tried. Maxwell could have testified that she didn't know what the person was talking about, that she was around Epstein a lot and he never had sex with anyone under age, especially not the (now) women that testified against her. No one could have refuted that. She didn't testify because she feared for her life in naming names. 20 years and coming out alive was better than getting what she thinks Epstein might have gotten.

3. Speaking of Epstein getting it, while I'm still skeptical of the idea that they waited to off him when he was in custody rather than while he was running around free, the bungling of the investigation and the failure to answer simple questions surrounding that does raise a lot of questions. You have to almost assume he was murdered. His death benefitted way too many people. Otherwise, he was a guy that did little girls, amassed a whole lot of wealth, and flew people to his island, people that didn't know what was going on. Does that really pass your smell test? What was the incentive for those that flew with him to the island if they weren't there for sex?

When you start thinking of this in terms not of R/d but of donors (to both parties) it starts to make more sense. Are you going to be at least a little sympathetic to the guy that helped finance your Michigan win, for example? I'm not saying that's the case here but IF there are donors out there that themselves or good friends are potentially involved, how would Trump or any of Trumps close advisors react?

I honestly don't know. I'd like to think he'd do the right thing but if Trump is still thinking about helping finance Congressional and Senate campaigns in '26 to help move his agenda along, who knows.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/ghislaine-maxwell-prison-transfer-epstein-b5efd6ac

Behind a paywall. Ha ha lolpoors

WSJ has an article this weekend about what it is like in the minimum security prison where she is housed. Apparently some of the inmates are upset because sex offenders aren't supposed to be in minimum security. Her presence is somewhat disruptive because suddenly minimum security isn't so minimum anymore. Lockdowns are more frequent, and some formerly unarmed guards are now carrying. Sounds like she also showers alone for safety reasons. Several inmates who answered questions for this interview got transferred to more secure facilities, but that is probably standard practice.
HECUBUS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's a country club. I used to deliver news papers there and learned about options trading from a guy waiting outside on the front porch for his newspaper every morning. His paper never got into the vending machine and I would use his change to open it up and load the rest.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artimus Gordon said:

Never forget the Biden FBI & Deep State had 4 years to destroy every bit of evidence incriminating every lefty liberal lunatic of child trafficking and molestation involved with Epstein and his island. Was it any wonder that it sat there for 4 years under Biden and no one was clamoring to get to the bottom of the sickening events surrounding that depraved episode in History?


They did release info, as they could per the fbi, the ongoing cases, etc. There's an entire thread on this.

Trump and Co said they'd release more, all of the names, now they're not.

Your claim of dems being scrubbed could have some evidence added if the current admin would just... do what they promised?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.