What's the craziest storyline of the night?

7,777 Views | 74 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by titan
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'llallowit/gif

johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a good summary of the craziest storylines that tie-in to the third option that approriately describes these demons among us:



Quote:

Just to recap the last two months:

-Charlie Kirk shot in the throat on stage
-Thousands of leftists spend weeks celebrating openly
-Leftist militants take to the streets committing and calling for more violence
-Attorney General candidate for Virginia expresses his desire to murder conservatives and watch their children die
-Democrats voters turn out en masse to vote for him

Do you understand who your enemies are yet?

The Ex Officio Director
How long do you want to ignore this user?
misterguinness said:

I think it is time to stop calling most of them "Jews". They are Americans with Israeli ancestors. They only think of themselves as Jewish when they need to play the victimhood card.


American jews would be the first ones waiting in line for the gas chambers. At least the Israelis would put up a fight.
Can't decide if I want to be cute & cuddly, or go blow some sh*t up.
Decisions decisions.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Central Committee said:

People get what they vote for good and hard.

Stupid dems.
Yes. Let them wallow in the coming misery that they voted for (although I am still curious how a mayor can enact the garbage he promised, much of which flies in the face of state law). But the rest of free America needs to ensure that cancer does not spread beyond the NYC city limits.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In this order: 1,3,2

1. Ground Zero for capitalism and Ground Zero of the most heinous Islamic attack in our history electing a communist Muslim just 24 years after 9-11 is an insult to the US. It's also a testament of how conservatives will never again win in large cities and how miseducated our youth have become.

3. Less surprising - Democrats have no morals or ethics and many publicly stated they want us dead and in camps.

2. Not surprising at all - blacks always vote for Democrats in huge numbers because they are the most brainwashed and lowest IQ group in that party.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know the most surprising.

But the least surprising thing is it's easier to sell blaming others rather than personal responsibility.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ78 said:

Don't forget Muslim Woman is now Lt. Gov of Virginia

Virginia needs to have another secession convention to divide the old dominion state to North and South Virginia.
GrimesCoAg95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most shocking to me was prop 14 in Texas.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It actually needs to divide east west. The old Tidewater is radical lefties and the Piedmont is the only sign of sanity.
army01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

amercer said:

People voted for Trump because he said he would make stuff cheaper.

A lot of those same people voted for democrats (or stayed home) because stuff isn't cheaper.

The republicans thought they won last time because people rejected all the crazy democrat social crap. But that was a misread of what happened. People voted against democrats because they decided that the Dems focused on crazy **** INSTEAD of focusing on the economy. And now it looks like the republicans have spent a year focusing on stuff other than the economy.

So they voted for people who are going to tax them more, and make things more expensive.

That's what we have now. All while he and his buddies make billions.
army01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An L of an Ag said:

CHEATING MECHANISMS HAVEN'T EVEN BEGUN TO BE DISMANTLED!!!!

Give it a ****ing rest. Maybe the Republicons lost because Trump's old pal wasn't there to cheat for him like he did in all of the swing states last year.
army01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

SunrayAg said:

Liberalism is truly a mental illness.


I am absolutely disgusted. These people just marching into hell. It's truly gross.

I think "these people" are tired of seeing ICE agents throw Americans on the ground because their skin complexion is darker than the agent wants it to be. I think "these people" are tired of Trump waging war on streets that were not the hell holes he pretended they were.

"These people" are done with people that say America first, but only if they make billions. That are okay with some brown people when it makes them money, but only when they are the ones prospering from it.

"These people" are disgusted at people that quote from the Bible, but don't live the most important messages in the Bible.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
army01 said:

annie88 said:

SunrayAg said:

Liberalism is truly a mental illness.


I am absolutely disgusted. These people just marching into hell. It's truly gross.

I think "these people" are tired of seeing ICE agents throw Americans on the ground because their skin complexion is darker than the agent wants it to be. I think "these people" are tired of Trump waging war on streets that were not the hell holes he pretended they were.

"These people" are done with people that say America first, but only if they make billions. That are okay with some brown people when it makes them money, but only when they are the ones prospering from it.

"These people" are disgusted at people that quote from the Bible, but don't live the most important messages in the Bible.

This is rediculous. Politicians profit and we should all stand against it. This is not a one party issue. It is not a one country issue.

These cities are dangerous. You can have a civil debate about the best way to handle it but acting like ther is not an issue is not the way. Refusing to acknowledge that there are politicians/judges in office/sitting who are actively/intentionally reducing our ability to enforce current law is not the way.

There are 10s of millions of illegals in this country that should be removed (consistent with current law). Open border policies are crazy and throwing Jesus at people who do not agree is childish. I should not be able to freely cross into Mexico and set up shop and vice versa.

If there is a "brown people are bad" contingent in this country, and there is, it is a very small group and the current president is not one of them.

Do better.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

Central Committee said:

People get what they vote for good and hard.

Stupid dems.

Yes. Let them wallow in the coming misery that they voted for (although I am still curious how a mayor can enact the garbage he promised, much of which flies in the face of state law). But the rest of free America needs to ensure that cancer does not spread beyond the NYC city limits.

This has been passed over too often, but you rightly remind, that the stakes here have as much to do with the DNC-MSM "nationalization" of the race, as it does the actual office. He is not even Governor of New York. How much can a mayor really do in opposition to his council, say? The real problem will be where they have fellow travelers. The BLM tone and pro Gaza tone is already strong in NYC, so Mamdani won't encounter much obstacles to defunding police and elevating criminals.
Hoyt Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

Central Committee said:

People get what they vote for good and hard.

Stupid dems.

Yes. Let them wallow in the coming misery that they voted for (although I am still curious how a mayor can enact the garbage he promised, much of which flies in the face of state law). But the rest of free America needs to ensure that cancer does not spread beyond the NYC city limits.

Yet there are people on this very thread and others wanting them to be elected so people can learn a lesson. Don't let it happen in the first place. Mind blowing dumb to want this crap to happen.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrat populist beat Democrat populist in NYC. Whats the issue? who cares
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach

You have just proved my point. Somehow you have conviced yourself that in seeing data that suggests voters are casting balllots emotionally and void of logic is wise?

You believe redistricting is a one party issue and that one party is doing it as a reactionary attempt to be practical? Practical? What you are saying makes no sense. There is not a path to peace in that thought process.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

We're 8-0

??





we like to win nattys right around the time the world is falling apart. 1939
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
AgFan1974 said:

amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach

You have just proved my point. Somehow you have conviced yourself that in seeing data that suggests voters are casting balllots emotionally and void of logic is wise?

You believe redistricting is a one party issue and that one party is doing it as a reactionary attempt to be practical? Practical? What you are saying makes no sense. There is not a path to peace in that thought process.

True. Have always rolled eyes at those that ridicule the probability of national divorce or it at least being attempted, let alone eventually warranted. They have no grasp of history, and how generations determine what they care about and can and cannot do-- not laws or habits.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach


Why do you never accept that blue states were already gerrymandered as well and aren't simply responding to it?
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for your offer for Republicans to take the moral high road so they lose house control.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach


Why do you never accept that blue states were already gerrymandered as well and aren't simply responding to it?


Well California wasn't for a while.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgFan1974 said:

amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach

You have just proved my point. Somehow you have conviced yourself that in seeing data that suggests voters are casting balllots emotionally and void of logic is wise?

You believe redistricting is a one party issue and that one party is doing it as a reactionary attempt to be practical? Practical? What you are saying makes no sense. There is not a path to peace in that thought process.


What I'm saying is that you put it to the voters in every state, all of them would opt for a non partisan process. Voters in the states that went first have rethought their choice because other states didn't follow. Not that hard to understand
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

What has never been clear is why not some kind of equidistant grid system. But grids small enough where even big cities don't have the "overwhelm" adjacent effect as much on a given locale? Small enough ,even the empty places might not impinge too much or vice versa.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amercer said:

Teslag said:

amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach


Why do you never accept that blue states were already gerrymandered as well and aren't simply responding to it?


Well California wasn't for a while.


Right, but Texas did what they did because of others. And let's be honest here, the biggest gerrymander of all is section 2 of the VRA and that's probably going bye bye.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

amercer said:

AgFan1974 said:

The contradictory exit polls vs. the actual vote is mind blowing and should be disected better to understand what the hell is going on. It signals to me that Americans are voting more and more by party lines and do not care what actually happens so long as the they win. This is dangerous and in my opinion is a recipe for future movements of secession and ultimately civil war. It feels like violence (more violence) is on the horizon. Very concerning. Im not a secession/civil war is coming guy, always thought it was a stretch. But Im not so sure when seeing data like this. We are lost.

One example: Prop 50

64 % vote yes
90% exit polls stated they prefer a 3rd party handle redistricting

There were other head scratchers but this one stuck out to me.


I think this is proof that voters are smarter than we give them credit for. I think a serious majority of all Americans would prefer non partisan redistricting and an end to gerrymandering. But since no red states are on board people in a blue state took the practical approach

You have just proved my point. Somehow you have conviced yourself that in seeing data that suggests voters are casting balllots emotionally and void of logic is wise?

You believe redistricting is a one party issue and that one party is doing it as a reactionary attempt to be practical? Practical? What you are saying makes no sense. There is not a path to peace in that thought process.


What I'm saying is that you put it to the voters in every state, all of them would opt for a non partisan process. Voters in the states that went first have rethought their choice because other states didn't follow. Not that hard to understand

My point is that casting a ballot against your own logical thought process is bizare and not being talked about enough. Maybe I should have used an example that was not so hot as to avoid going off topic. There were others data sets that showed we are casting ballots contradicting our own principles (this is happening both ways Id guess). That is crazy to me (see thread topic). Its an observation not a stance on gerrymandering. It is actually a look past the partisan issue and into the psyche of the electorate. I am generally optimistic but I can't ignore the ominous vibe I get when digesting that data.

annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Psycho Bunny said:

Dems win every where. This just means come Saturday, Aggies are going to get spanked across the field.


They won in three states that never went for Trump.

Other than a socialist, terrorist being elected mayor, the others are not surprising. And sadly, that isn't really either. Just a bunch of dumbasses.
I avoid temptation unless I can’t resist it.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FatZilla said:

Jews voting in majority in nyc for the muslim and terrorist supporter who wants jews dead...

I am done picking favorites I think. I don't care if Muslims are more barbaric and disgusting. I only like and respect Christians and their clear allies now.

MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keep in mind the party in power is always asked to justify their actual results while the party out of power can spew all the BS they want to about how great things will be if they are put back in power, and they're not yet held accountable for results.


People LOVE to be told the lies they want to believe.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Honestly, I would say white liberal women are the most brainwashed Democrats.
I avoid temptation unless I can’t resist it.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
El Gallo Blanco said:

FatZilla said:

Jews voting in majority in nyc for the muslim and terrorist supporter who wants jews dead...

I am done picking favorites I think. I don't care if Muslims are more barbaric and disgusting. I only like and respect Christians and their clear allies now.



Yesss..... great figure.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
army01 said:

An L of an Ag said:

CHEATING MECHANISMS HAVEN'T EVEN BEGUN TO BE DISMANTLED!!!!

Give it a ****ing rest. Maybe the Republicons lost because Trump's old pal wasn't there to cheat for him like he did in all of the swing states last year.


His old pal Kamala Harris, who no one liked, turned herself into a box wine mom meme, couldnt conduct an honest interview during the entire campaign, and blew a billion dollars in 107 days?

Yeah, I think things would have been easier if they were both on the ticket.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amercer said:

People voted for Trump because he said he would make stuff cheaper.

A lot of those same people voted for democrats (or stayed home) because stuff isn't cheaper.

The republicans thought they won last time because people rejected all the crazy democrat social crap. But that was a misread of what happened. People voted against democrats because they decided that the Dems focused on crazy **** INSTEAD of focusing on the economy. And now it looks like the republicans have spent a year focusing on stuff other than the economy.
it defies explanation that trump and republicans got the trifecta on the back of voters wanting relief from an affordability crisis, and their signature economic policy (which they're extremely proud of) was to make things even more expensive via tariffs. completely detached from their own voters.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.