FatZilla said:Its Texas Aggies, dammit said:FatZilla said:infinity ag said:Quote:
For me it's not a matter of a wealth gap it's a matter of people in the middle class being able to spend on discretionary items while also being able to save responsibly. Right now a lot of people are struggling to make ends meet. I don't care if rich people get richer. Good for them. I want the middle class to simultaneously thrive. And I want people in the lower class to have good opportunities to advance into the middle class.
The issue is the rich are getting richer at the cost of middle class. So while Steve Moneybags goes from $100M to $200M, you see Steve Middleclass go from $50k to $52k.
Now if we could get Mr Middleclass to go from $50k to $100k AND Mr Moneybags go from $100M to whatever Million, I am all for it. But middle class and poor in America remain where they are.
Nothing stops middle from going 50k to 100k other than incompetence and unwillingness to learn investing and the discipline to actually save money instead of blowing everything as you earn it.
Wow. That is a simplistic take if I have ever heard one. Yes, success is possible. At the same time, younger people have the deck stacked against them in so many ways. The wealth divide is worse than ever. The broken money has a lot to do with it. And I predict that there will be a bloodbath in the mid-term elections as a result. Money printing has far-reaching consequences. www.wtfhppenedin1971.com tells the story.
Except its not. Wealth gap between middle and upper class has zero bearing on personal fiscal discipline at every level. Elon Musk having billions has no impact on my ability or anyone elses to save and invest what i can. This generation doesn't save. They blow money on credit like interest doesn't exist and then wonder why they are broke. Inflation and spending power is a whole different ballgame but that wasn't the topic, wealth gap was.
I agree that discipline is necessary in order to generate wealth. That does not change the fact that debasement of the currency disproportionally affects people in the middle class and below, effectively making it harder for them to improve their situation financially. When, for example, 40% of the dollars to ever exist were printed during Covid, wage earners who had few assets suffered disproportionately, while those at the top of the food chain got even richer because of the appreciation of their assets. If our money could not be printed out of thin air, the benefits of technological progress would not flow so disproportionately to those in the top percentiles of wealth. Compare median income to median home price in the past versus now. People use their homes as piggy banks to try to escape debasement of the currency. As a result, it is a lot harder for young people to get into their first home than it was in the past.