Don't care one way or the other: they both gleefully voted for soft on crime policies because their overpriced education told them to do so.

Owlagdad said:

---

That guy sure was shifty and quickly avoided the right thing to do.

---

Typical liberal

deddog said:

---

Well, that should be the end of that relationship.
At best he's a narcissist.

---

He's a coward.

Maybe we all have it wrong: she likes being in a relationship with a coward and weakling and feels empowered for defending him.

Wish someone would have taken the attacker's knife and slit his throat, the castrated the soy boy companion.

That same guy probably dons a mask and an antifa flag, and then throws rocks at cops.

No one should feel sorry for that woman for what her bf did. She chose him, almost certainly knew he was this type, then stayed with him.

Not a good look. Also, if he knew he was like this, he should not have traveled to Columbia. Rual Canada would have been more of his speed for a backpack tourist adventure with the girl he does not want to protect. Less risk for looking bad.

Columbia backpacking adventure (not a 5 start trip)- You have to assume at some point you're going to have to fight your way out of a situation. Just take her to Vermont.

Liberals should be celebrating that they have finally brought the patriarchy down and have emasculated men.

And they have "empowered" women to defend themselves.

Toxic Non-Masculinity.

That "dude" is a lil *****!

Lord it would suck to be that dude right about now. He will regret that inaction the rest of his life.

infinity ag said:

---

For the "gentleman" types here from the 1950s.

---

This is a perfect description.

Women voted for this, but don't really want it.

They want to have their cake and eat it too.

In some respects, I can kind of sympathize with some of them. For a vast portion of the female population, women were told that they had to find their self-worth in a combination of being both career and family oriented at the same time, a balance that is impossible to find and still keep your sanity.

Asking a man to be driven primarily by empathy and still have the ability to make cold, rational decisions is a recipe for disaster, but that is exactly what women want, as long as you also have a beautiful six-pack, are a super-rich neuro-surgeon, and can usually make home in time to help with the dishes.

Not that being a 100% jock thug is a good look, either. I'm pretty sure that there are zero decent women that want to have a relationship with the mugger.

But real men need to be meek. The Arameic term for meek (makikhe) is not a weakling, it's a man that is very good with a sword, always carries a sword, but never uses it. So, meek, as in, very dangerous, but also very judicious about when to be physically or rationally violent. The Greek word praus also denotes the same thing.

From the Memes thread:

Just talked to my boys about this exact thing this morning - you see a girl getting hit you take care of it. That dude deserves all the shame headed his way

jellycheese said:

---

I honestly can't comprehend stepping away and hiding while a woman is being attacked. Much less my wife or someone I love. This is such a foreign reaction to me that my brain can't make sense of it.

---

I mean there were COLOMBIAN males who didn't even know them who stopped and attacked the knife guy!

and he is just standing there.

hard to believe that can even be possible!!

100% that dude graduated from the University of Texas or Notre Dame!

nm

BusterAg said:

---

infinity ag said:

---

For the "gentleman" types here from the 1950s.

---

This is a perfect description.

Women voted for this, but don't really want it.

They want to have their cake and eat it too.

In some respects, I can kind of sympathize with some of them. For a vast portion of the female population, women were told that they had to find their self-worth in a combination of being both career and family oriented at the same time, a balance that is impossible to find and still keep your sanity.

Asking a man to be driven primarily by empathy and still have the ability to make cold, rational decisions is a recipe for disaster, but that is exactly what women want, as long as you also have a beautiful six-pack, are a super-rich neuro-surgeon, and can usually make home in time to help with the dishes.

Not that being a 100% jock thug is a good look, either. I'm pretty sure that there are zero decent women that want to have a relationship with the mugger.

But real men need to be meek. The Arameic term for meek (makikhe) is not a weakling, it's a man that is very good with a sword, always carries a sword, but never uses it. So, meek, as in, very dangerous, but also very judicious about when to be physically or rationally violent. The Greek word praus also denotes the same thing.

---

I blame the men in power (mainly American rich white old men) who allowed this. We can blame lib women all we want but if the men in power had thwacked them across the face, laughed at them and sent them on their way, none of this nonsense would have happened. But no, they decided to simp for adulation.


Soyboys? Now these are the real soyboys. Who ruined the masculine culture of this country and made it a bad word "toxic masculinity". Now no man wants to be "toxic".The man in the video is just a symptom of the disease and everyone is rushing to trash him while not talking about the cause of the disease.

Quote:

---

Can any gay F16 posters back me up here? I'm not being homophobic or any of that ****; I'm merely trying to explain my perception to help those who've commented that they can't imagine a guy not rushing to a woman's aid. Well, ever since masculinity was deemed toxic, the resulting product is this, which we'll call Exhibit A.

---

If it had been me with her when she was attacked, that perp isn't getting up on his own power. My mama taught me to be chivalrous, and I'm not afraid of a fight.

rooftop18403 said:

---

The attacker knew he had it easy when he saw the fanny pack across the dude's chest. Your appearance matters.

---

Exactly what I thought. Fanny pack around the chest....

"mama taught me..."

Hmm.

That is how America got to be so feminized. What is masculine and what is not is today determined by a female!!

Every generation since WWII has been taught to be weaker and weaker. This is what happens when fathers don't teach their sons to be men. My sons know they get a foot up the arse when they don't open the door for a woman, even if its their mom or sister.

I have stopped several altercations in my life where most men were standing there watching. My family knows I hate getting involved in situations like this but have seen what happens if I do. Momma lied, sometimes violence is the best option.

The "toxic masculinity" and feminist movement was planned and killed a generation of men. Now we have a bunch of beta-men.

I have the confidence that if someone did that around me that I know they would be spending time in the hospital. I don't "see red", I have actually trained how to fight like men should. One of my main jobs as a husband and father is to protect my family.

We sure that was a fanny pack around his chest and not a baby sling and the baby was chestfeeding?

Seriously though, Colombia may not have gotten the memo on toxic masculinity as the Latino machismo kicked in on a few of the passersby who came to the woman's aid with helmet and fists.

It was a win-win for the guy. No awkward break-up conversation regardless of outcome.