deddog said:
infinity ag said:
deddog said:
infinity ag said:
deddog said:
flown-the-coop said:
infinity ag said:
flown-the-coop said:
Malibu said:
I can feel sympathy for the plight of these folks as individuals. They made a life here, followed the process, and got screwed. There should have been more humanity in a process that ended this cleanly and not stranding people with no agency into a nightmare. That doesn't mean backfilling foreign labor for high skilled US jobs is a good policy. We could have both ended the policy and fairly allowed for people to make responsible plans for their future knowing it would sunset rather than marooning them away from their family and property.
The process IS that their visas must be renewed. So they didn't get screwed. The just didn't get picked up for another season. Now they can take their experience learned here and can contribute in a beneficial way to their country.
If they want permanent residency, they need something other than an H-1B.
Assuming your visa renewal was automatic was and is a big problem of the problem.
Best Trump here.
Hey you are right. I hadn't thought of it that way.
It is not anyone's fault if they bought expensive houses and cars on a TEMPORARY work visa. They should have waited until they got a green card which is more permanent.
I can foresee a housing market crash though with many H1Bs in places like SF, Seattle, Dallas, Atlanta forcing to flee. Prices will crash but make housing more affordable for Americans too.
Lots of impacts.
They can sell their house remotely and have their wares shipped to them.
I posted in another thread a while back but this happened to a friend of mine, H1-B from Jordan, who was told her visa may not be renewed. She planned accordingly and was indeed denied re-entry.
Even if you went to Mexico is was subject to review and could be denied.
There is literally nothing new here except if they are denied they are home instead of Ciudad Juarez.
They aren't being denied. Their appointment is being pushed for 6 months.
Yes, but the point is that their visas are temporary so if they make purchases assuming permanency, it is their own fault.
They are interviewing to ask for a renewal as their "contract" for work permit is ending. US can at that point just say no and it would not even be unethical.
My point wasn't about stuff. It was changing rules mid -stream to be more punitive against legal folks.
Ok i get it, we don't like H1s or the H1 program. Government changing the rules mid-stream against those following the law just stinks. It's unnecessarily punitive.
This pleases the crowd, but these seem like half-assed measures that aren't thought through.
**** like this is why its easier to be illegal.
Which rules in particular are being changed midstream against legal folks?
Deciding to incorporate social media checks going further back in time, which specifically lead to a 6-month delay in reviewing and renewing Visas. This is fine for new Visas, but the OP talks about H1 renewals, so these folks were previously reviewed.
This is deliberately punitive against people who were previously approved and followed the legal process. I don't like the idea of government intentionally ****ing people over.
Stop putting people in government purgatory.
I don' think the social media checks are for people with existing visas. It is for renewals, no? Please correct me if I got that wrong.
Here is how I look at it. An H1B is given for 6 years. The person is vetted and given a visa for 6 years. After the visa expires, if the person wants a renewal, it is okay for the US to change the rules of vetting and make it stricter or less strict based on the situation. This would apply for brand new visas also.
I don't agree with you that they are getting screwed on renewals just because years ago they got it in a different situation. There is no grandfathering in this situation.
What may be slightly wrong/unfair is if a 6 year visa was approved with certain rules, and then the Government changes the rules and asks the approved person to be judged by the new rules. But then maybe not.
Remember people get screwed by corporations all the time. I have as well. People get hired, the get great reviews, the CEO wants his bonus, so they put the guy on PIP to fire him. Amazon does that all the time, it's called PIP-factory for that reason.
Why do you object when the government does it but are okay with corporations do it? I actually trust the government more than a corporation. At least I can vote a crooked President out. Can I get a crooked CEO out?