Government can't even redact properly?!

3,588 Views | 51 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by K2-HMFIC
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?


Sure. An anonymous tip to the FBI is not factual information. I can call in a random tip about you if I wanted to.

And I'm not a fan of Trump…Check my post history if you'd like. I'd be happy to hear some more substantiated evidence about it though so we can get this all sorted out
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:

Urban Ag said:

Said for years now it was right there in the open that Epstein was intelligence. CIA, MI6, Mossad, maybe the Saudis. Others.

Trump wasn't screwing around with underage girls. Everyone already knew Clinton was a perv/horndog and he gets away with it. Prince Andrew is guilty AF based purely on how the royals have treated him (they know). This wasn't about protecting individuals, it has always been about protecting the agencies and therefore the image of the country.

From Bush 43 to Trump 47, no administration has wanted to touch this.

That seems the most probable explanation. Something that's never been clear is how much the victims involved were there because of initial involvement -- that is, hanging around the rich and powerful in an `orbiting' manner, or whether any of these were outright abductions. In any case, for such, they really can't expect a system like this to ever fix itself.


Similar comments have been said as to why the government say on JFK assassination files for so long even though most people have passed away. It is not about protecting anyone. It is about shielding institutions.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Concerned Moderate Ag said:

HTownAg98 said:

Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.


He said Doge cut the Adobe subscriptions. Whether that's true, shrug.

This would be hilarious if true!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burdizzo said:

Concerned Moderate Ag said:

HTownAg98 said:

Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.


He said Doge cut the Adobe subscriptions. Whether that's true, shrug.


In all fairness, most software licenses are severely overpriced.


When you run a small business that is not a law firm and you need to manipulate pdf files, may I recommend FoxIT PDF Editor (and +/Pro edition).

Reasonable price and does everything you need it to, including document protection, collaboration, signature security.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

HTownAg98 said:

Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."


Captkirk's razor never assume that malice and incompetence are mutually exclusive.

Georgiag's razor: Mercadel Safety Razor with Japanese Stainless Steel Blades. 1005 Badger Shaving Brush Taylor of Old Bond Street Shaving Cream Bowl
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?


Kamala Harris, who is not an anonymous tip, publicly accused Biden of rape right before he selected her as VP. Your side didn't care and celebrated the pick.

Did you comment on that?
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Burdizzo said:

Concerned Moderate Ag said:

HTownAg98 said:

Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.


He said Doge cut the Adobe subscriptions. Whether that's true, shrug.


In all fairness, most software licenses are severely overpriced.


When you run a small business that is not a law firm and you need to manipulate pdf files, may I recommend FoxIT PDF Editor (and +/Pro edition).

Reasonable price and does everything you need it to, including document protection, collaboration, signature security.



I do consulting engineering. We use the hell out of BlueBeam for drawing markup. Most of our industry does. I have used it side by side with Adobe for document management. It kicks adobe in the teeth for a lower cost (or so I am told)
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Funny innit. It's almost like it all centered on attacking Trump and not really about justice. Frankly, that amazes me. Never saw it coming.

I am perfectly fine with all redactions coming off. That obviously is not great for the victims and the targets of misinformation and false accusations, but anything less will be endless circles of redaction talk, coverups, and aliens conspiring with Mossad, aliens and the Antichrist to honeypot Reagan into giving weapons to Nicaraguans.

The DOJ could remove all redactions, but then the argument would become the DOJ hasn't released all the documents.
The Democratic Party leadership and their minions will never be satisfied, ever.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?

It's all Trump Derangement Syndrome! Do not believe your lying eyes!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I use ActiveTakeoff. Need to look at BlueBeam.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I will have to look into Active Takeoff. Sounds like it is construction focused.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

flown-the-coop said:

Funny innit. It's almost like it all centered on attacking Trump and not really about justice. Frankly, that amazes me. Never saw it coming.

I am perfectly fine with all redactions coming off. That obviously is not great for the victims and the targets of misinformation and false accusations, but anything less will be endless circles of redaction talk, coverups, and aliens conspiring with Mossad, aliens and the Antichrist to honeypot Reagan into giving weapons to Nicaraguans.

The DOJ could remove all redactions, but then the argument would become the DOJ hasn't released all the documents.
The Democratic Party leadership and their minions will never be satisfied, ever.

Of course. It's why it's not even worth it to respond to the "why are we not discussing the allegations of rape by POTUS" even though those accusations have been PROVEN false.

Nothing will satiate the Get Trump crowd. Even getting him won't.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twelve12twelve said:

Gordo14 said:

Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?

It's all Trump Derangement Syndrome! Do not believe your lying eyes!
.

Yes, and Trump was in some pee tapes, over fed some Koi fish and got two scoops of ice cream. Almost as bad as when he grabbed the steering wheel of the Beast
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rocky the dog said:



And no matter which path you take, it'll eventually lead to the other one, making a circle.

And people say our government is good at nothing.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

fc2112 said:

It isn't even that hard to flatten a PDF.


Aaaand.... that is why we need H1Bs. We don't even know how to flatten a PDF in America anymore. We don't have any tech skills in America. </CEOs


Quote:

Flight Attendant: Is there a Doctor onboard?


Indian Dad: *Nudging me* That should have been you
Me: Not now Dad
Indian Dad: Not asking for a Graphic Designer to help, are they?
Me: Dad, there's a medical emergency happening right now
Indian Dad: Why don't you save him as a PDF and see if that helps.

samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twelve12twelve said:

Gordo14 said:

Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?

It's all Trump Derangement Syndrome! Do not believe your lying eyes!

Why comment on flimsily at best accusations? Take the L

If proof existed it would have come out during all three elections.
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Important question…

Sooo…does this mean we're gonna be able to get unredacted pictures of Ghislaine's giant mammaries?

This is critical…for uh…research and investigative purposes.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.