Gordo14 said:
Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?
titan said:Urban Ag said:
Said for years now it was right there in the open that Epstein was intelligence. CIA, MI6, Mossad, maybe the Saudis. Others.
Trump wasn't screwing around with underage girls. Everyone already knew Clinton was a perv/horndog and he gets away with it. Prince Andrew is guilty AF based purely on how the royals have treated him (they know). This wasn't about protecting individuals, it has always been about protecting the agencies and therefore the image of the country.
From Bush 43 to Trump 47, no administration has wanted to touch this.
That seems the most probable explanation. Something that's never been clear is how much the victims involved were there because of initial involvement -- that is, hanging around the rich and powerful in an `orbiting' manner, or whether any of these were outright abductions. In any case, for such, they really can't expect a system like this to ever fix itself.
Concerned Moderate Ag said:HTownAg98 said:
Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.
He said Doge cut the Adobe subscriptions. Whether that's true, shrug.
Burdizzo said:Concerned Moderate Ag said:HTownAg98 said:
Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.
He said Doge cut the Adobe subscriptions. Whether that's true, shrug.
In all fairness, most software licenses are severely overpriced.
captkirk said:HTownAg98 said:
Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Captkirk's razor never assume that malice and incompetence are mutually exclusive.
Gordo14 said:
Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?
flown-the-coop said:Burdizzo said:Concerned Moderate Ag said:HTownAg98 said:
Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.
He said Doge cut the Adobe subscriptions. Whether that's true, shrug.
In all fairness, most software licenses are severely overpriced.
When you run a small business that is not a law firm and you need to manipulate pdf files, may I recommend FoxIT PDF Editor (and +/Pro edition).
Reasonable price and does everything you need it to, including document protection, collaboration, signature security.
flown-the-coop said:
Funny innit. It's almost like it all centered on attacking Trump and not really about justice. Frankly, that amazes me. Never saw it coming.
I am perfectly fine with all redactions coming off. That obviously is not great for the victims and the targets of misinformation and false accusations, but anything less will be endless circles of redaction talk, coverups, and aliens conspiring with Mossad, aliens and the Antichrist to honeypot Reagan into giving weapons to Nicaraguans.
Gordo14 said:
Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?
richardag said:flown-the-coop said:
Funny innit. It's almost like it all centered on attacking Trump and not really about justice. Frankly, that amazes me. Never saw it coming.
I am perfectly fine with all redactions coming off. That obviously is not great for the victims and the targets of misinformation and false accusations, but anything less will be endless circles of redaction talk, coverups, and aliens conspiring with Mossad, aliens and the Antichrist to honeypot Reagan into giving weapons to Nicaraguans.
The DOJ could remove all redactions, but then the argument would become the DOJ hasn't released all the documents.
The Democratic Party leadership and their minions will never be satisfied, ever.
.twelve12twelve said:Gordo14 said:
Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?
It's all Trump Derangement Syndrome! Do not believe your lying eyes!
rocky the dog said:
infinity ag said:fc2112 said:
It isn't even that hard to flatten a PDF.
Aaaand.... that is why we need H1Bs. We don't even know how to flatten a PDF in America anymore. We don't have any tech skills in America. </CEOs
Quote:
Flight Attendant: Is there a Doctor onboard?
Indian Dad: *Nudging me* That should have been you
Me: Not now Dad
Indian Dad: Not asking for a Graphic Designer to help, are they?
Me: Dad, there's a medical emergency happening right now
Indian Dad: Why don't you save him as a PDF and see if that helps.
twelve12twelve said:Gordo14 said:
Anybody going to comment on how there's accusations of rape against our president that were poorly redacted? Or is that something people here want to continue to pretend isn't part of this?
It's all Trump Derangement Syndrome! Do not believe your lying eyes!
YouBet said:Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:HTownAg98 said:
Someone either used the black highlight tool (lol, lmao even) or they don't have an Adobe Acrobat DC license to use the redact and sanitize tools.
Probably weren't able to load it on their govt computer.
Also because Acrobat is expensive bloatware. I hope we aren't paying for those licenses.
