AGinHI said:
4stringAg said:
policywonk98 said:
Posted most of this message in another thread will post it here because I'm flabbergasted there are people arguing that citizens have a right to protest law enforcement operations at the point of operation.
If Pretti is at the bottom of the steps of the Capitol building with a protest sign asking Congress to change immigration laws he would still be alive today. If he was outside of this local congressman's office, he would still be alive today. If he was on any random corner bringing the issue to the attention of passersby he would still be alive today.
That is my starting and ending point on all debates on this subject. The shoot could be good or bad. I absolutely want to know that all law enforcement agencies including ICE are doing their level best to mitigate bad shoots even for those they are trying to apprehend I have no interest in seeing loss of life unless that life is truly threatening the lives of those apprehending them.
But in the case of Pretti and all would be protestors, good and bad shoot is secondary. This would be like acting like an entire war should be ended because an imbedded reporter is killed in the field of battle. If you voluntarily choose to go into a field of battle when you are neither the soldier or the enemy combatant, you take on certain risks.
This man chose to show up to an active law enforcement operation. I don't have to ask any of my friends who have been in law enforcement because I've heard enough of their stories over the years of what it's like when they are part of an operation to apprehend a suspect. If you insert some group of protesting people wanting to block or thwart your operation, that's not a good situation and the voluntary action of a protestor knowingly try to enter into an operation area takes 100% of the responsibility. Some free climber just scaled a skyscraper live on tv the other day. If that guy fell to his death that's not the building fault or the film crews fault. Nobody made him free climb that skyscraper.
It is absolutely absurd to me that anyone is defending people's right to organize a law enforcement COUNTER-Operation as a form of protest. That is not what the constitution is protecting. It's not. And to the extent that a state and municipality is withholding cooperating local Leo's for operations, that needs to be investigated to the extent there are long standing cooperative agreements and federal support to localities for the express purpose of cooperative ops in order to prevent these exact scenarios from happening.
Good shoots or bad shoots. Every operational shoot should be investigated and our law enforcement should do everything in their power to control the operational zone they are creating. Public safety has taken a back seat here and it largely rests on the shoulders of the governor of MN and mayor of Minneapolis, who are both trying to score political points with those that want no immigrations laws to exist much less enforcement of those laws.
This is a great post because it touches on the First Amendment argument leftists are making that he "had a right to protest" which as you adeptly pointed out what he was doing was not protesting but interfering which is breaking federal law and not protected freedom of assembly.
Further, on the 2A arguments that the leftists are throwing around, his 2A protections ended when he interfered and thus committed a federal crime while carrying a gun. And its the Jurassic Park Ian Malcolm statement on his decision to carry: while he was too busy thinking he could carry a gun, he didn't stop to think if he should carry a gun knowing he was going to disrupt and agitate.
Leftists are emotional children arguing about this from a child's POV based on instant reaction from video and hindsight.
All great points.
About your last point which I have emphasized, we need to be less general that the left isn't simply a bunch of overly emotional dimwits.
There are psychopaths, people without conscience and without morality, in positions of influence and power and atop the ruling class, in addition to those amidst the throng of pawns, who know exactly what they are doing. Through lies and deceit they are whipping into a frenzy the true believers and "emotional children" to achieve their selfish ends.
The strange dichotomy to me is how the REAL communist orchestrators play the long game planning deep into the future, but the leftist shills that comprise most of the dem party these days seem to lack any sense of long-term consequence for their positions and actions.
There seems to be little depth to their plans, living in the moment, depending on the protection of the sheer inertia of their delusional movement. They seemed shocked when they finally meet reality and a little resistance, and without having to practice a rational understanding of their beliefs and agendas, they can only act out emotionally, like children.
It is a suicidal track they are on, but they are so wrapped around the telephone pole with their orchestrated emotional responses, they can't see the logical conclusion to the design.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.