TheHulkster said:
I actually never really seriously bought into the stolen election narrative aside from them actually doing what they told us they did in this article from Time in changing the mail-in voting laws, getting social media companies to coordinate against "disinformation" and influence their users toward voting for Biden, and that type of thing. Obviously very unprecedented and very not okay, but not like straight up manufacturing ballots, casting ballots for dead people, 2000 Mules types of claims, etc.
But that lady looks really nervous, doesn't she? Definitely acting like someone who just got caught stealing an election.
Believe me back in November 2020 I was far from any type of electronic voting system expert, still aren't but when stories and excuses being given are not making sense to me, I do what I do. Conduct my own research.
And when I got stumped or confused about how a certain software or hardware would work, other posters here would help explain it to me, get me back on track.
Thousands of hours going down rabbit holes and memory holes. I got to the point where I could listen to "technical" testimony and immediately know it was BS and evasive, if not outright prevarication. Frustrating as hell for me but it was what it was.
So now we are just inches away from confirmation that electronic voting machines were in fact vulnerable (by design) to be remotely accessed and election data altered or deleted. And the people supposed to watch for that crap, EAC and CISA were foxes guarding the henhouse.