rgag12 said:
Before everyone imprints this in their mind as actual events happening in Iran, the above article is someone's OPINION on what COULD happen. The basis for his opinion is grounded on events that happened in Syria, which had been embroiled in years long civil war before Assad left. We haven't even gotten to civil war in Iran.
There are no reasons why anyone from the IRGC should be fleeing, they hold the power and are causing all our problems. The civilian leaders who want to make a deal, and have been blocked at every turn, are the only ones who might even consider fleeing at this point.
It's not the same chronology, sure, but it is similar in that Assad lost the ability to pay his military/enforcers, so the regime quickly 'shockingly' lost control of key territory (much smaller country). The economic/financial collapse in Iran is actually more severe on a near-term timeline vs. the last 6 months of Syria under Assad, imho.
Quote:
Meanwhile, the Iranian top tier may well be preparing their golden parachutes.
Quote:
With diplomatic options perhaps exhausted and the regime's stability in question, an expert suggests the exit strategy any leadership may be eyeing might be similar to that of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who fled Syria in 2024.
"If the situation deteriorates further, some senior figures could potentially follow a path like Bashar al-Assad's inner circle and seek refuge in Russia," Middle East expert Saeid Golkar told Fox News Digital.
Because you know these guys all have Swiss bank accounts. That's a given in thug societies like the present-day Iran.
The IRGC had to import Shia arab 'militias' from Iraq (at great cost) last month to put down the latest threats/uprisings, and their cash flow is not improving. Yes, I agree it is speculative but again I don't think it is easy to say anyone's prognostication at this point is just not right with any degree of certainty. If I were a high ranking IRGC 'type' with tens of millions stashed in Swiss accounts etc, I wouldn't be enthused to stick around given the 'situation' around Iran. It could become a violent route in a hurry.
And, the
shadow banking sector being targeted matters, not least of all Bank Sepah. Notice even China (quietly) restricted transactions with our targeted sanctioned IRGC folks:
Quote:
China's government publicly ordered its companies to ignore US sanctions on Iranian oil buyers. Its financial regulator then quietly told the same banks to stop lending to those companies. Beijing's mouth says one thing. Beijing's money says another.
On May 2, China's Ministry of Commerce invoked its Blocking Statute, formally ordering all Chinese entities not to acknowledge or comply with US sanctions against five Chinese petrochemical companies buying Iranian crude. It was a defiant, public stand on sovereignty.
Within days, China's National Financial Regulatory Administration privately advised its largest state-owned banks to suspend new loans to those same five sanctioned refineries.
No press release. No public statement. No acknowledgment that this directly contradicts the Commerce Ministry's position.
This is the gap between what the CCP says and what it actually does when its banks' access to the US financial system is at stake. Secondary sanctions, which Rubio warned would follow, cut off any institution doing business with sanctioned entities from the entire US dollar system. Chinese state banks cannot afford that. So they comply quietly while the government shouts defiance publicly.
China is not actually standing by the IRGC, and that matters, imho, militarily/strategically.