SCOTUS rules Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs are illegal

19,722 Views | 338 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by FIDO_Ags
StonewallAggieDEFENSE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crap. Now US companies are going to have to start building and manufacturing quality products to be competitive. Where in the land of gen z are we going to find anyone competent now that the boomers are leaving?
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

Wow. Lutnick family making bank off betting SCOTUS would rescind the tariffs.

https://www.rawstory.com/howard-lutnick-2675289149/

They're not the only ones. The market for these was huge. We helped some clients file the protective claims just so they could sell them. Some of the execs we worked with saw it as free money but by selling the rights they could easily say "we didn't get any refunds" when their customers started wanting their tariff surcharges back.
Burpelson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the end, SCOTUS saved us from Socialism, eventually Democrats will have power.
Jack Boyette
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have some of the dumbest alums on earth. These people that think tariffs are bad, and that now we can't impose them, etc.

You people are so dense. You have no clue WHY this was done.

[If you're posting simply to insult the board, then take a long break -- Staff]
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump was partially right, he did reduce the trade deficit. He managed to reduce it from $903.6 billion to $901.5 billion, or a 0.2% reduction. That's basically a rounding error. And people paid more for goods, and businesses have even more uncertainty. So much winning.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Gradin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not a fan of his tantrums that he's throwing right now because he didn't get his way.
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burpelson said:

In the end, SCOTUS saved us from Socialism, eventually Democrats will have power.


This has to be sarcasm
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

Trump was partially right, he did reduce the trade deficit. He managed to reduce it from $903.6 billion to $901.5 billion, or a 0.2% reduction. That's basically a rounding error. And people paid more for goods, and businesses have even more uncertainty. So much winning.


There are other variables. Without Trump's tariffs and trade policies, the trade deficit would have been minimum $1.1 T. That's the real comparison.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MagnumLoad said:

HTownAg98 said:

Trump was partially right, he did reduce the trade deficit. He managed to reduce it from $903.6 billion to $901.5 billion, or a 0.2% reduction. That's basically a rounding error. And people paid more for goods, and businesses have even more uncertainty. So much winning.


There are other variables. Without Trump's tariffs and trade policies, the trade deficit would have been minimum $1.1 T. That's the real comparison.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
pinche gringo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoDog said:

Once again A.C. Barrett disappoints. I bet Trump would like to have a do over on that nomination.


She is a freaking disaster
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/20/tariff-refunds-supreme-court-00791244

Quote:

What happens to billions in tariff money already paid?
Quote:

Trade and customs experts agree any potential repayment process will be a logistical "nightmare" for both the federal government and the companies seeking compensation and that legal fights are likely.
That would create a "particularly unfair burden for smaller importers," said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the libertarian Cato Institute, noting they "lack the resources to litigate tariff refund claims."
Quote:

The Justice Department and parties in the tariff litigation have already asked the Court of International Trade to establish a steering committee to coordinate the more than 1,000 refund-related cases now pending, a common step in large, complex trade disputes.
Quote:

In court filings, the DOJ has acknowledged that if the tariffs are ruled unlawful, importers would likely be entitled to refunds, which CBP would process, primarily via its Automated Commercial Environment system, as the agency transitions to fully electronic refund payments.

Quote:

Industry groups are already pressing the Trump administration to swiftly issue refunds.
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The architect of Trump's tariff policy is a Mormon, actually.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/16/business/economy/jamieson-greer-trump-trade.html
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoDog said:

Once again A.C. Barrett disappoints. I bet Trump would like to have a do over on that nomination.

Imagine being in favor of taxes.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is this horse *****
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAggie2011 said:

BusterAg said:

agsalaska said:

Should have been 9-0. They were obviously illegal from the very beginning.

No, they were not.

They were not illegal until SCOTUS said they were. The legal argument for them likely would have carried the day in many other circumstances. But, for this court, for this issue, in 2026, Trump wasn't going to win.

Nah. Something is not legal until a Court says it is illegal. The first person to break a law doesn't get a free bite at the apple.
So we can prosecute all those people who had illegal abortions in violation of state law from 1973-2022?
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a clown. You hold your breath you fat f***


"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry said:

Forum Troll said:

SpreadsheetAg said:




This guy and Nick Sortor are complete bots.

"Red siren, omg Trump totally pwns <insert entity which Trump has grievances with> !!!11!!"
Yeah it's amazing that educated people communicate like this, much less have large followings. Our media, be it local beat writers or national syndications, is one big clickbait fest
And what's up with the annoying way he puts so many random words in all caps? I wish we could put a tariff on posting tweets from that guy.
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:


bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ragoo said:

annie88 said:


bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:



bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling

It's not everybody on the right, just the Trump worshipers who embrace his populism. He's tapped into the working man's frustration and uses it to peel away voters that historically voted Dem.

Conservatives embrace free markets with limited government participation. Trump likes picking winners and losers and playing the role of boss, not too different from his Apprentice TV show.

I don't care for the populism, but I despise even more the outright marxism of the Dem party.
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:


bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling
being protectionist of domestic private industry is not communism- it's smart policy. When you offshore all of your capabilities at the quest of increased margin you slowly bleed yourself out and then become beholden to the very entity your offshored to.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ragoo said:

tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:



bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling

being protectionist of domestic private industry is not communism- it's smart policy. When you offshore all of your capabilities at the quest of increased margin you slowly bleed yourself out and then become beholden to the very entity your offshored to.

It can make sense in limited applications. It's also a great way to combat the ridiculous demands of unionized labor that want everything but won't offer anything in return like flexibility that allows improved productivity over time. Labor that's protected is not competitive. It gets fat and lazy.

Some unions got the message and changed their approach to partner with management to improve their overall competitiveness. Others resisted; those are the ones that typically get tossed into the dustbin of history by market forces over time.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MemphisAg1 said:

tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:



bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling

It's not everybody on the right, just the Trump worshipers who embrace his populism. He's tapped into the working man's frustration and uses it to peel away voters that historically voted Dem.

Conservatives embrace free markets with limited government participation. Trump likes picking winners and losers and playing the role of boss, not too different from his Apprentice TV show.

I don't care for the populism, but I despise even more the outright marxism of the Dem party.

When the Dems get in power they will use Trump's populism against the Reps. Trump has laid the foundation for future Dem economic policies that some of us accepted as failures and unsustainable decades ago.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tysker said:

MemphisAg1 said:

tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:



bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling

It's not everybody on the right, just the Trump worshipers who embrace his populism. He's tapped into the working man's frustration and uses it to peel away voters that historically voted Dem.

Conservatives embrace free markets with limited government participation. Trump likes picking winners and losers and playing the role of boss, not too different from his Apprentice TV show.

I don't care for the populism, but I despise even more the outright marxism of the Dem party.

When the Dems get in power they will use Trump's populism against the Reps. Trump has laid the foundation for future Dem economic policies that some of us accepted as failures and unsustainable decades ago.

I don't disagree. It's all part and parcel of society's ongoing shift to the left.

Too many people want stuff that somebody else ultimately pays for, and politicians are all too ready to appease them in order to retain power.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burpelson said:

In the end, SCOTUS saved us from Socialism, eventually Democrats will have power.

Like those Dems will stop because of a court ruling. If they sense blood in the water they will step on the gas and ignore the courts.

When they get in power the filibuster will be gone. They wanted it gone during Biden and did everything they could do to kill the filibuster, except for Manchin and Sinema (and they are now gone). We have geriatric republicans not wanting to do a speaking filibuster and a STAFFER of a senator who is cognitively impaired holding up the Save Act. Not an elected official - a bureaucrat.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MemphisAg1 said:

tysker said:

MemphisAg1 said:

tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:



bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling

It's not everybody on the right, just the Trump worshipers who embrace his populism. He's tapped into the working man's frustration and uses it to peel away voters that historically voted Dem.

Conservatives embrace free markets with limited government participation. Trump likes picking winners and losers and playing the role of boss, not too different from his Apprentice TV show.

I don't care for the populism, but I despise even more the outright marxism of the Dem party.

When the Dems get in power they will use Trump's populism against the Reps. Trump has laid the foundation for future Dem economic policies that some of us accepted as failures and unsustainable decades ago.

I don't disagree. It's all part and parcel of society's ongoing shift to the left.

Too many people want stuff that somebody else ultimately pays for, and politicians are all too ready to appease them in order to retain power.

America has (had?) lots of 'other people's money' for politicians to use in their political interests.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MagnumLoad said:

HTownAg98 said:

Trump was partially right, he did reduce the trade deficit. He managed to reduce it from $903.6 billion to $901.5 billion, or a 0.2% reduction. That's basically a rounding error. And people paid more for goods, and businesses have even more uncertainty. So much winning.


There are other variables. Without Trump's tariffs and trade policies, the trade deficit would have been minimum $1.1 T. That's the real comparison.

People would have been paying less for goods than they are today, and businesses would have more certainty. With tariffs, we got a rounding error in the trade deficit, and an economy that grew at a meh 2.2% in 2025.
How does that make us better off?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems know how to pick SC justices. Republicans suck at it.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinochet said:

shiftyandquick said:

Wow. Lutnick family making bank off betting SCOTUS would rescind the tariffs.

https://www.rawstory.com/howard-lutnick-2675289149/

They're not the only ones. The market for these was huge. We helped some clients file the protective claims just so they could sell them. Some of the execs we worked with saw it as free money but by selling the rights they could easily say "we didn't get any refunds" when their customers started wanting their tariff surcharges back.

You guys are selling tariff refund claims? I think lottery tickets are a better value. Will these claims be printed on soft 2-ply paper so one day they can at least have some value?

Selling tariff refund claims and they were overdue dental office collections sounds scheisty as hell. Advising companies this is a good idea is even worse.

infinity_ag may be on to something when he lambasts the greediness and lack of ethics at large companies.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ragoo said:

tysker said:

Ragoo said:

annie88 said:


bermie is a loon but his position in 2008 against unchecked free trade was correct. I saw it with my own eyes. The offshoring of segment of manufacturing to china took hours out of two shops I worked at. Those hours used to burden the G&A. The company entered a death spiral of 1) offshore 2) raise shop rate 3) raise product price due to increased shop rate 4) offshore more 5) close domestic manufacturing altogether because the shop rate had to get so high it could no longer compete

It's amazing to me how anti-free trade and Communist-style economics are becoming so prevalent on the right.

Seriously the GOP used to be party pushing back against this stuff, even getting the US into wars overseas to stop the spread of these poisonous ideas, and now the right has steadfastly defended these same policies as good for our country. The backslide over the last decade is mind boggling
being protectionist of domestic private industry is not communism- it's smart policy. When you offshore all of your capabilities at the quest of increased margin you slowly bleed yourself out and then become beholden to the very entity your offshored to.

Then you and Bernie will be very happy together. But make no mistake: that old commie has never in his life embraced an economic idea a) with any actual merit, and b) that was good for America.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The last Republican to use tariffs as their economic policy before Trump was Herbert Hoover, and it helped cause the Great Depression.

BUT......this time it's going to work!

Don't worry about the GDP tanking and the lack of jobs and the inflation......that's just because of the secret police force rounding up people and putting them into camps!!

In fact, when you think about it, this is the greatest economy RIGHT NOW in the history of the United States!!

[now you know why Republicans are going to be absolutely crushed in the election and they deserve it]
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.