Austin Mass Shooting 6th Street

45,169 Views | 291 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by RED AG 98
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
one safe place said:

While it is sad when anyone is killed, it particularly bothers me to see these young kids that have their lives ended, just taken away. Their future stolen. By some riff raff. And it bothers me that we are so reluctant to punish these subhuman thugs. Why so afraid have the death penalty apply to many more crimes than it does and to fast track the trial (couple of weeks) fast track the appeal (a week), then execute them the next day. In most of these types of things there is no question as to guilt.

Well, there are a lot of precedent that would prohibit such an expedited death penalty procedure, so that's not really on the table.

But, when an officer is charged and tried for excessive use of force on someone they shot and killed, I do think there should be consideration given as to whether the deceased suspect would have faced the death penalty anyway. (Some evidentiary issues that would severely restrict defense counsel either presenting evidence or arguing that. I do not agree with them.)
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
t said:

Sounds like a false flag actually.

Yeah , that's it.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

redsquirrelAG said:

18,000 confirmed in the US for operation homeland. Is this part of the initial waves or a one off? He absolutely was groomed by someone.

Most likely the fbi.


Yup! Like all the other mass shooters they magically have money to buy weapons and magically avoid detection from anyone despite arrests and online posts that would normally raise alarms. Just another mass shooter skipping through the cracks!


MOSSAD OP for sure
C/O 2013 - Company E2
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

redsquirrelAG said:

18,000 confirmed in the US for operation homeland. Is this part of the initial waves or a one off? He absolutely was groomed by someone.

Most likely the fbi.


Yup! Like all the other mass shooters they magically have money to buy weapons and magically avoid detection from anyone despite arrests and online posts that would normally raise alarms. Just another mass shooter skipping through the cracks!


MOSSAD OP for sure


Thanks for this!
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Cowboy Curtis said:



Texas law requires it be presented to a grand jury.

That said, Garza is a commie POS.


I don't think so. It's called the Wren Collective that Austin has adopted.



Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Cowboy Curtis said:



Texas law requires it be presented to a grand jury.

That said, Garza is a commie POS.

It's been a hot minute since I researched this but I believe there was no law requiring this, it's just a policy in certain locales.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's a commie POS who should've had his license revoked after what he did to Daniel Perry.

What happens with this case has nothing to do with whether or not he's a commie POS.
Wheatables02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As someone else mentioned, all Officer Involved Shootings go before a grand jury. This one should last a an hour and be done in record time. That being said, he's still a commie.
@NFLPlayerProps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Say "Ndiaga" five times very fast
Esteban du Plantier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you for bringing a little sanity to the pitchfork rally.

All lethal force instances are presented before a grand jury. Oftentimes the DA presents no case and the grand jury declines to indict, or the DA presents a case and they still fail to indict. These are 'no bill'. Or they see sufficient evidence to proceed with indictment.

I'm not doubting that the DA would love to see all self defense as a crime, but in this case it's just normal procedure.

Now, if they're charged with a crime? All hell should break loose with the rational public (not sure how many of those are in Travis county).
.
Scruffy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Esteban du Plantier said:

Thank you for bringing a little sanity to the pitchfork rally.

All lethal force instances are presented before a grand jury. Oftentimes the DA presents no case and the grand jury declines to indict, or the DA presents a case and they still fail to indict. These are 'no bill'. Or they see sufficient evidence to proceed with indictment.

I'm not doubting that the DA would love to see all self defense as a crime, but in this case it's just normal procedure.

Now, if they're charged with a crime? All hell should break loose with the rational public (not sure how many of those are in Travis county).


Can the GJ decide to instead charge the DA?
What power does a GJ have?
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not mandatory and it is not statewide. This is a local policy decision, and apparently Garza has already stated he won't refer them to GJ in this instance...

https://www.ksat.com/news/texas/2026/03/03/da-wont-refer-police-who-killed-austin-shooter-to-grand-jury/

Quote:

DA won't refer police who killed Austin shooter to grand jury

Every shooting involving a police officer in Travis County for the past several years has gone before a grand jury a policy that District Attorney Jos Garza has said ensures transparency.

But after several police officers took down the gunman in a mass shooting in downtown Austin early Sunday, Republican politicians and law enforcement advocates began hammering Garza's office over the idea that the officers could face possible criminal charges.

Gov. Greg Abbott also weighed in during what became an all-day social media controversy: "These police officers are heroes who saved lives. Whatever the DA does, I will have the final say in the fate of these police officers," Abbott posted.

In a statement released Tuesday afternoon, Garza echoed Abbott's assessment of the officers and indicated that he would make an exception to the grand jury policy for officer involved shootings.

"These officers are heroes, and it should go without saying that my office is not seeking any charges and would not seek charges," Garza wrote. "The accounts to the contrary are false, intentionally false, and are being peddled for obvious political purposes. We are proud to work with our partners at the Austin Police Department every day and are so grateful for the bravery that these officers showed."

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.