8-1 with the ******ed justice the one.
Of course retard Jackson dissents. She has no business on SCOTUS given how low her IQ is. Shes completely ignorant of the Constitution. https://t.co/C8BH9rtQ50
— FreedomFromTheLeft (@JMPFreedom) March 31, 2026
Of course retard Jackson dissents. She has no business on SCOTUS given how low her IQ is. Shes completely ignorant of the Constitution. https://t.co/C8BH9rtQ50
— FreedomFromTheLeft (@JMPFreedom) March 31, 2026
🚨 BREAKING: The US Supreme Court just STRUCK DOWN Colorado's insane ban on conversion therapy for children, which is used to help American youth get out of the transgender identity cult
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 31, 2026
8-1 ruling, JACKSON is the only dissent.
MASSIVE VICTORY!! 🇺🇸
Thank you, SCOTUS! Protect… pic.twitter.com/jQM8Ei6O4W
gtaggie_08 said:
Or the most junior justice is taking her sweet time writing a completely incoherent opinion the length of war and peace to try and rationalize a completely unjustifiable opinion in an effort to "run out the clock" on VRA for midterms
Jarrin Jay said:
Jackson bases her rulings / opinions on feelings and how she wants things to be, not the law or legal scholarship. She is a complete moron and has no business on the SCOTUS bench. Poster child for diversity hire and any R that supported or voted for her confirmation is a 100% RINO.
Ag with kids said:Jarrin Jay said:
Jackson bases her rulings / opinions on feelings and how she wants things to be, not the law or legal scholarship. She is a complete moron and has no business on the SCOTUS bench. Poster child for diversity hire and any R that supported or voted for her confirmation is a 100% RINO.
Collins, Murkowski, Romney were the 3 Republicans.
aggie93 said:
The worst thing about Jackson to me is that she epitomizes the negative traits many view black women to have and none of the positive. There are many highly intelligent black women that can speak with reason and scholarship, someone like Condoleeza Rice for instance. Yet having someone like Jackson who's main accomplishment is making Sotomayor look better is unfortunate because many black women will look up to her and see her as the brilliant trailblazer no matter what her opinions. They will see her actions inside and outside the courtroom as the way things should be and any criticism of her as racism and sexism even though she is a complete idiot from an objective point of view. Reading her opinions it is also clear she hires the biggest woke idiots she can find as clerks.
Jarrin Jay said:
Jackson bases her rulings / opinions on feelings and how she wants things to be, not the law or legal scholarship.
VarkAg77 said:aggie93 said:
The worst thing about Jackson to me is that she epitomizes the negative traits many view black women to have and none of the positive. There are many highly intelligent black women that can speak with reason and scholarship, someone like Condoleeza Rice for instance. Yet having someone like Jackson who's main accomplishment is making Sotomayor look better is unfortunate because many black women will look up to her and see her as the brilliant trailblazer no matter what her opinions. They will see her actions inside and outside the courtroom as the way things should be and any criticism of her as racism and sexism even though she is a complete idiot from an objective point of view. Reading her opinions it is also clear she hires the biggest woke idiots she can find as clerks.
We can talk about Jackson all day long, and I won't disagree with any of it, but if she's such a moron, we also have to direct that criticism to the 10th Circuit Court which upheld that law, and required a SCOTUS review to begin with.
It should never have gotten to the Supreme Court, and there's something wrong if obvious decisions have to get that far in the first place.
Quote:
Last year, Justice Jackson dissented in the U.S. v. Skremetti case- in which she argued that states have no right to ban gender transitions on minors.
Today, she was the lone dissent on Chiles v. Salazar, writing that "there is no right to practice medicine which is not subordinate to the power of states."
So, states have no right to pass laws banning children from changing their sex- but states DO have the right to ban counselors from telling boys they are not girls. You truly can't make it up.
Last year, Justice Jackson dissented in the U.S. v. Skremetti case-- in which she argued that states have no right to ban gender transitions on minors.
— Theo Wold (@RealTheoWold) March 31, 2026
Today, she was the lone dissent on Chiles v. Salazar, writing that "there is no right to practice medicine which is not… pic.twitter.com/J7D3fa6fYa
Im Gipper said:
No RapierAg. Not official.
Conversion therapy is discredited junk science that inflicts harm on LGBTQ youth.
— Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) March 31, 2026
The Supreme Court’s decision is disappointing and puts vulnerable kids at risk. https://t.co/VKAPSwemkF
Logos Stick said:
Ole Gavin has to weigh in and appeals to Science ™Conversion therapy is discredited junk science that inflicts harm on LGBTQ youth.
— Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) March 31, 2026
The Supreme Court’s decision is disappointing and puts vulnerable kids at risk. https://t.co/VKAPSwemkF
Logos Stick said:
Ole Gavin has to weigh in and appeals to Science ™Conversion therapy is discredited junk science that inflicts harm on LGBTQ youth.
— Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) March 31, 2026
The Supreme Court’s decision is disappointing and puts vulnerable kids at risk. https://t.co/VKAPSwemkF
🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court only has one more case left to decide — whether or not to limit Democrat-favored race drawn VRA Congressional Districts...
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 31, 2026
...and SCOTUS Justice SAMUEL ALITO is the only justice without a written opinion so far.
HERE WE GO! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/bJ7djJvBg5
aggiehawg said:
So if Alito is writing the majority opinion in the VRA case, that gives me some optimism the Court will get rid of minority/majority districts.
Gaeilge said:🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court only has one more case left to decide — whether or not to limit Democrat-favored race drawn VRA Congressional Districts...
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 31, 2026
...and SCOTUS Justice SAMUEL ALITO is the only justice without a written opinion so far.
HERE WE GO! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/bJ7djJvBg5
Gaeilge said:aggiehawg said:
So if Alito is writing the majority opinion in the VRA case, that gives me some optimism the Court will get rid of minority/majority districts.
Same. I could see this playing out with him writing the majority and then announcing his retirement to secure his seat with a conservative appointment.
Notably, Justice Jackson trains her fire on Justices Kagan and Sotomayor. In a footnote she basically accuses them of being dupes for the conservative majority. Kagan responds, basically accusing Jackson of not understanding longstanding law. 👀 pic.twitter.com/paR4XOKZMv
— Eric W. (@EWess92) March 31, 2026
KBJ: 'How Can A Law Be Unconstitutional If I Like It?' https://t.co/4GyylvlaMy pic.twitter.com/KGL2vxQtyD
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) April 1, 2026
Quote:
"If I like what it says, then that means it should be a law, right?" Jackson reportedly asked her colleagues on the court, according to transcripts. "I mean, laws are just things we like that we want to make everybody do, right? Is that what it means? So, like, if there's something that I think is nice and I want everyone else to agree with me, I just say it's a 'law,' right? That's what I always thought. I don't know. I don't really remember them talking much about law stuff when I went to law school."
The court reportedly took a 15-minute recess during its deliberation so Jackson's fellow liberal justices could give her a rudimentary explanation of what terms like "law" and "unconstitutional" mean. "It's always a great learning opportunity for her," said one court insider. "Every case brings up something else she doesn't understand. Last month, we spent an hour telling her what a 'court' is."
nortex97 said:
2 opinions today, or 1?
8-1 with the ******ed justice the one.Of course retard Jackson dissents. She has no business on SCOTUS given how low her IQ is. Shes completely ignorant of the Constitution. https://t.co/C8BH9rtQ50
— FreedomFromTheLeft (@JMPFreedom) March 31, 2026
Trump after listening to Kentaji Brown Jackson butcher the English language for hours on end https://t.co/DxLUjihOCW pic.twitter.com/1ed2rGawWs
— Pub (@PubWanghaf) April 1, 2026
P.H. Dexippus said:
Not sure how I feel about Trump sitting in. Will it help the cause or be viewed negatively by members of the Court, especially the chief?
it will make liberal minds explode thoughBMX Bandit said:P.H. Dexippus said:
Not sure how I feel about Trump sitting in. Will it help the cause or be viewed negatively by members of the Court, especially the chief?
I don't think it will have any effect one way or the other.