Rapier108 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

So if Alito is writing the majority opinion in the VRA case, that gives me some optimism the Court will get rid of minority/majority districts.

---

Same. I could see this playing out with him writing the majority and then announcing his retirement to secure his seat with a conservative appointment.

---

If he announces his retirement, it will be on the last day of the term, likely the end of June or early July.

That said, he would likely inform Trump of his plans earlier so the vetting process could start and a nominee could be named the same day.

---

Secolobo said:

---

Only fitting when a public school will be named after Jackson...

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

P.H. Dexippus said:

---

Not sure how I feel about Trump sitting in. Will it help the cause or be viewed negatively by members of the Court, especially the chief?

---

I don't think it will have any effect one way or the other.

---

ts5641 said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

2 opinions today, or 1?

8-1 with the ******ed justice the one.

Of course retard Jackson dissents. She has no business on SCOTUS given how low her IQ is. Shes completely ignorant of the Constitution. https://t.co/C8BH9rtQ50

— FreedomFromTheLeft (@JMPFreedom) March 31, 2026

---

She's really not even a judge at this point. She's a left wing activist on the bench...for life...

---

A lot of people missed this earlier today, but Justice Jumanji heavily implied during oral arguments that if you sneak into her office and steal her robe, that makes you a Supreme Court Justice.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 1, 2026

The more you hear Ketanji Brown Jackson talk, the more you realize why Democrats think women are too dumb to get voter id.

— Jimmy Failla (@jimmyfailla) April 1, 2026

“Your honor, my client is American because he committed his crimes in America” https://t.co/PIfuZaUTGD pic.twitter.com/xKJyQMbbhf

— Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeaceful) April 1, 2026

nortex97 said:

---

Weird, was intending to include the embedded/re-posted tweet; here's another.

🚨 BREAKING: The US Supreme Court just STRUCK DOWN Colorado's insane ban on conversion therapy for children, which is used to help American youth get out of the transgender identity cult

8-1 ruling, JACKSON is the only dissent.

MASSIVE VICTORY!! 🇺🇸

Thank you, SCOTUS! Protect… pic.twitter.com/jQM8Ei6O4W

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 31, 2026

Always good to see KBJ's crayon opinion in the minority.%A0 She is still reading her opinion, might have a second one today.%A0

---

🚨 The Supreme Court spoke clearly. Colorado lawmakers chose not to listen.

After the Supreme Court ruled in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado’s law was unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination—and made clear that talk therapy is protected speech, not “conduct”…

Colorado… pic.twitter.com/w12nVPjjdg

— Erin for Parental Rights (@Erin4Parents) April 2, 2026

Quote:

---

The Supreme Court spoke clearly. Colorado lawmakers chose not to listen.

After the Supreme Court ruled in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado%92s law was unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination%97and made clear that talk therapy is protected speech, not %93conduct%94%85

Colorado democrats didn%92t back down. They doubled down.

They pushed amendments to HB26-1322 (L016) to redefine a counselor%92s speech as %93conduct%94 in statute%97the exact argument the Court just rejected.

Translation:%A0
If the Supreme Court says you can%92t censor speech%85 just relabel it and punish it anyway.

Eight justices said the government can%92t control what counselors say based on viewpoint.%A0
Colorado%92s response? Pass another law to do exactly that.

How truly wild that they just keep getting away with this.

---