8 children between the ages of 1 and 14 are dead after a mass shooting in Louisiana

11,374 Views | 83 Replies | Last: 23 days ago by Muy
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

EX TEXASEX said:

If some lady aborted 8 kids Nuscum would celebrate her being empowered and celebrate her exercising her right to access " Healthcare "!! The libs turming abortion into " Healthcare " is one of the most disgusting/vile cases of gaslighting on the planet

It goes back further than that - to LBJ and his ilk essentially incentivizing the destruction of the black nuclear family and promoting fatherless children and unwed mothers.

Yep, you are right, but it goes back even further than that.In the Communist Manifesto Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels called for the abolition of the bourgeois nuclear family, So, even back in 1848 journalists were a pernicious cancer on society!! To break a society you have to go after and destroy its foundations, culture, values and institutions. I would say the most important institution in a society is the family. That is why liberals never give up their violent attacks on it year after year.
El Chupacabra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You don't hate people like Newsom, and those that would vote for him, enough.

And you truly can't fathom how twisted and evil they really are.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SteveA said:

Quote:

Also ridiculous this is considered a "mass shooting"

Domestic violence shouldn't be included in "mass shooting" stats to further push gun control.

"Mass shooting" numbers would drop by 95% if they only counted shooters actually targeting random people.

I think if you shoot 8-14 people, it's a mass shooting. I think you are playing with the numbers to oppose gun control if you didn't categorize it as such, which is what you are accusing the other side of doing.

If it's not a threat to the general public (domestic violence, gang related, etc) then a "mass shooting" inaccurately describes the risk to said general public. It's not about belittling victims, it's about identifying problematic behaviors.

To put it simply, odds say you won't get shot my gangsters unless you are a gangster. To include that in such charged and, frankly, politically persuasive categories like "mass shootings" is deliberately misleading voters to overreact to things that otherwise aren't a significant threat. It's not a public safety assessment. It's trying to scare voters into pulling the Blue lever.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmellba99 said:

EX TEXASEX said:

If some lady aborted 8 kids Nuscum would celebrate her being empowered and celebrate her exercising her right to access " Healthcare "!! The libs turming abortion into " Healthcare " is one of the most disgusting/vile cases of gaslighting on the planet

It goes back further than that - to LBJ and his ilk essentially incentivizing the destruction of the black nuclear family and promoting fatherless children and unwed mothers.


And the mob moved their vice operations into the black community to score a win for the FBI.
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

To put it simply, odds say you won't get shot my gangsters unless you are a gangster. To include that in such charged and, frankly, politically persuasive categories like "mass shootings" is deliberately misleading voters to overreact to things that otherwise aren't a significant threat. It's not a public safety assessment. It's trying to scare voters into pulling the Blue lever.

So all of the kids he shot were gangsters? While I do understand your point, mass shootings, in regard to gun control, relate to the amount of people that are easily dispatched with a fire arm, which is why these statistics are used in those arguments. Conversely, every time you see the statistics of white male mass shooters, there are always many who bring up all of the domestic and gang related mass shootings to battle that. I think it is disingenuous to argue one, and not the other.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
K
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

ATX_AG_08 said:

I knew this was going to be the case.



It's virtually always the case, and will continue to be until society has had enough and stop electing leftists who let criminals off with a slap on the wrist at most.
When are Americans going to be able to sue these judges in the civil court when the judges' actions (or in this case lack there of) have shown to cause more loss of life and property?
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Line Ate Member said:

Rapier108 said:

ATX_AG_08 said:

I knew this was going to be the case.



It's virtually always the case, and will continue to be until society has had enough and stop electing leftists who let criminals off with a slap on the wrist at most.

When are Americans going to be able to sue these judges in the civil court when the judges' actions (or in this case lack there of) have shown to cause more loss of life and property?

Screw sueing them.

Tarring and feathering needs to make a comeback.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Decay said:

SteveA said:

Quote:

Also ridiculous this is considered a "mass shooting"

Domestic violence shouldn't be included in "mass shooting" stats to further push gun control.

"Mass shooting" numbers would drop by 95% if they only counted shooters actually targeting random people.

I think if you shoot 8-14 people, it's a mass shooting. I think you are playing with the numbers to oppose gun control if you didn't categorize it as such, which is what you are accusing the other side of doing.

If it's not a threat to the general public (domestic violence, gang related, etc) then a "mass shooting" inaccurately describes the risk to said general public. It's not about belittling victims, it's about identifying problematic behaviors.

To put it simply, odds say you won't get shot my gangsters unless you are a gangster. To include that in such charged and, frankly, politically persuasive categories like "mass shootings" is deliberately misleading voters to overreact to things that otherwise aren't a significant threat. It's not a public safety assessment. It's trying to scare voters into pulling the Blue lever.


This is yet another term that has been hijacked, on purpose, for purposes of pushing gun control. "Mass shooting" always meant the random, public shootings like we've seen almost exclusively from far left wing trans people the past few years. And I think you made a good distinction here.

It never applied to the daily murdering that blacks do to one another which is a culture problem.
The Ex Officio Director
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mas89 said:

Started about 2006, the year we left Walden for a move around 6 miles to the North. Now the same problems are coming to the new/ old apartments on both sides of the river.

I remember as a young kid shopping with my parents at Greenspoint mall. I couldn't wait till I was older to stay at the Hilton with the green roof. Now days, you couldn't pay to stay a night in that area. Humble is now the new Greenspoint. Greenspoints should be renamed 7th ward. Especially since that area is about to become district 6 for HSCO. County is going to take the worse of district 1 and 2, making district 6. It's going to be a rodeo every night.
Can't decide if I want to be cute & cuddly, or go blow some sh*t up.
Decisions decisions.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SteveA said:

Quote:

To put it simply, odds say you won't get shot my gangsters unless you are a gangster. To include that in such charged and, frankly, politically persuasive categories like "mass shootings" is deliberately misleading voters to overreact to things that otherwise aren't a significant threat. It's not a public safety assessment. It's trying to scare voters into pulling the Blue lever.

So all of the kids he shot were gangsters? While I do understand your point, mass shootings, in regard to gun control, relate to the amount of people that are easily dispatched with a fire arm, which is why these statistics are used in those arguments. Conversely, every time you see the statistics of white male mass shooters, there are always many who bring up all of the domestic and gang related mass shootings to battle that. I think it is disingenuous to argue one, and not the other.

You are talking about two different things.

The use of gang violence whenever somebody not gang related goes out and does crazy evil person things is used to put the numbers thrown around about mass shootings in perspective.

Inevitably when one happens we hear some stupid high number. You know, like "there have been 87 mass shootings this year already". Except 85 of those mass shootings are specific to gang violence and not specific to a mass shooting in the manner in which the term was invented for. Crips and Bloods or Banditos and Hell's Angels shooting each other shouldn't be used as part of the statistical data because it doesn't fall within the metrics of what a mass shooting is. Sure, the number may hit the made up threshold of 4 people, but every other metric does not, and that is the point.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Ex Officio Director said:

Mas89 said:

Started about 2006, the year we left Walden for a move around 6 miles to the North. Now the same problems are coming to the new/ old apartments on both sides of the river.

I remember as a young kid shopping with my parents at Greenspoint mall. I couldn't wait till I was older to stay at the Hilton with the green roof. Now days, you couldn't pay to stay a night in that area. Humble is now the new Greenspoint. Greenspoints should be renamed 7th ward. Especially since that area is about to become district 6 for HSCO. County is going to take the worse of district 1 and 2, making district 6. It's going to be a rodeo every night.

Gunspoint
The Ex Officio Director
How long do you want to ignore this user?
*sigh* yeah
Can't decide if I want to be cute & cuddly, or go blow some sh*t up.
Decisions decisions.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Yes, Gavin, the issue is the NRA and not the blatantly obvious black culture problem.


If anyone gets brutally murdered by a scumbag who should already be in prison, it should be Gavin Newsome. He is simply a horrible human.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.