Hank the Grifter said:
I'll be that guy.
It's "Victory in Europe Day" not "Victory Day in Europe".
Hank the Grifter said:
I'll be that guy.
It's "Victory in Europe Day" not "Victory Day in Europe".
aggiehawg said:Hank the Grifter said:
I'll be that guy.
It's "Victory in Europe Day" not "Victory Day in Europe".
VE Day for short.
D-Day was June 6th 1944. VE Day less than a year later. Would no have been possible without Patton and Montgomery coming up from North Africa, landing in Italy and advancing to meet (sometimes miraculously so) with the Normandy forces.
aggiehawg said:
Of course, neither Patton nor Montgomery were ever in Tunisia and certainly never landed in Italy. Riight.
A large percentage of German POWS that were brought stateside were captured in North Africa, but whatever.
aggiehawg said:
Of course, neither Patton nor Montgomery were ever in Tunisia and certainly never landed in Italy. Riight.
A large percentage of German POWS that were brought stateside were captured in North Africa, but whatever.
aggiehawg said:Hank the Grifter said:
I'll be that guy.
It's "Victory in Europe Day" not "Victory Day in Europe".
VE Day for short.
D-Day was June 6th 1944. VE Day less than a year later. Would no have been possible without Patton and Montgomery coming up from North Africa, landing in Italy and advancing to meet (sometimes miraculously so) with the Normandy forces.
torrid said:
When is VI day?
Highway6 said:
And sadly, 90% of graduating high school students for the last 10 years have no idea what we are talking about
annie88 said:Highway6 said:
And sadly, 90% of graduating high school students for the last 10 years have no idea what we are talking about
They don't even know we have 50 states.
TheEternalOptimist said:
I have come to the realization that the way WW2 history has been spun has a lot of holes in it.
Reason for outbreak of WW2 in Europe:
Sudetenland, Rest of CZ, and eventually half of Poland taken by Nazis. UK and France declare war to defend liberty of Poles from being ruled by tyrannical German regime. But neither declare war on USSR who took the other half......
Reason for outbreak of Japan/US hostility WW2 in Pacific:
Ostensibly, the invasion of China, mostly in Manchuria, and US objections to it. US allegedly did not want an Imperial Authoritarian/Industrialist regime ruling over people in China.
Outcome of Poland, CZ, China, and North Korea at end of War?:
Puppet states defacto ruled over the USSR with Communist radicals in control locally. Poland, CZ, EGerm, Hun, Rom, Yugo, Albania, and Bulgaria through the re-conquest of land as the Red Army pushed west. Instead of drawing a hard line in the sand, US and UK capitulated to Stalin demands.
China's Mao immediately used the post-ww2 chaos to large scale attack Chang's ROC nationwide and swiftly win the civil war. China's people ended up in a totalitarian Communist regime which went on to murder far more of them than the Japanese ever could have. And North Korea today only exists as a by product of the late stage Soviet entry in the final weeks of WW2 against Japan.
So what was the point again when the nations we were fighting to save mostly ended up under totalitarian Communism after being rescued from Imperialism and Fascism?
By the way, none of my thinking on this means that in any way I am demeaning or insulting the bravery or memory of those who fought and died in WW2. The military men are still heroes to me and they fight for each other.
Remember that "War is a mere continuation of policy [or politics] by other means." Clausewitz
Got a Natty! said:
Two weeks from yesterday I along with another Aggie land in Paris to start a Band of Brothers tour. Both our dads went ashore in Normandy then fought through the Battle of the Bulge.
Bucket list for both of us. Already have an Aggie flag packed for photo opportunities.
Quote:
The winner writes the history books