PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

High bypass turbofans don't really "consume" a body. Probably lots of chunks chopped and scattered

---

What exactly does "consumed" mean if not: "lots of (body) chunks chopped and scattered"?

---

Based on username...


My presumption... Limbs were separated from the torso and maybe maybe not all entered the nacel. Whatever went in, was then tremendously chopped up by the outer fan blades. Being that it's a high bypass engine some solids might have passed through the bypass. Whatever went inside, towards the engine core, was further shredded by the rotating compressor vanes and stationary guide vanes. Depending on remaining moisture content this fine particulate and must was largely burned, but there's probably a lot of unburned "buildup" as the engine began to also disintegrate.

Plenty was burned since FD had to do the final extinguish on the engine fire.

I saw a small dog once get into I-45 in the Woodlands... 70mph SUV vs 10lb dog... There was a pink cloud of mist and not much else.

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

High bypass turbofans don't really "consume" a body. Probably lots of chunks chopped and scattered

---

What exactly does "consumed" mean if not: "lots of (body) chunks chopped and scattered"?

---

Based on username...


My presumption... Limbs were separated from the torso and maybe maybe not all entered the nacel. Whatever went in, was then tremendously chopped up by the outer fan blades. Being that it's a high bypass engine some solids might have passed through the bypass. Whatever went inside, towards the engine core, was further shredded by the rotating compressor vanes and stationary guide vanes. Depending on remaining moisture content this fine particulate and must was largely burned, but there's probably a lot of unburned "buildup" as the engine began to also disintegrate.

Plenty was burned since FD had to do the final extinguish on the engine fire.

I saw a small dog once get into I-45 in the Woodlands... 70mph SUV vs 10lb dog... There was a pink cloud of mist and not much else.

---

Agreed with everything you wrote. But if there was 1 word you had to use summarize your post, what's a better word to use than consumed? Everything I can come up with is, at best, synonymous.

Consumed was used in the OP so I ran with it.

Ingested?

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

Consumed was used in the OP so I ran with it.

Ingested?

---

More inhaled from the pressure gradient.

aggiehawg said:

---

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

Consumed was used in the OP so I ran with it.

Ingested?

---

More inhaled from the pressure gradient.

---

"Processed"

12th Man said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

Consumed was used in the OP so I ran with it.

Ingested?

---

More inhaled from the pressure gradient.

---

"Processed"

---

Not untrue, but still synonymous with consumed IMO.

I liked "consumed" but "choked on" probably works as well.

Frontier Airlines A321, Flight 4345, struck and killed a pedestrian on DEN Runway 17L last night during its takeoff roll. The person had just jumped the perimeter fence and ran onto the active runway. The individual was hit about two minutes later near the mid-field area, far… pic.twitter.com/4WPzW4hK3M

— SafetySwipe (@SafetyNotorious) May 9, 2026

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

Consumed was used in the OP so I ran with it.

Ingested?

---

It's the right word to use, even if only partially consumed like the initial reports had. Some bozo claimed jet engines can't consume a body, but instead "chop and scatter" them as if that doesn't mean the same thing.

Twelve people injured? Five requiring hospitalization?

https://apnews.com/article/denver-airport-frontier-airline-person-injured-runway-e75355b2bed9ec3bae44cb064c92c1da

Dam… not a good idea to cross in front of an airplane ….. must have had some mental issues

They evacuated and that usually leads to injuries

Here's some attention

GAC06 said:

---

They evacuated and that usually leads to injuries

---

Kind of what I figured. Video showed many evacuated with their carry-ons, which didn't help.

GAC06 said:

---

Here's some attention

---

Appreciate your retraction. Accuracy matters.

Follow someone else around, weirdo

Name calling?

Rockdoc said:

---

Name calling?

---

Give him a break. If he doesn't want to defend his original post, let him walk it back.

Ex Ex Officio Director said:

---

Homeless guy?

---

The airport is like its own city out there. Doubt homeless people hang out there

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

High bypass turbofans don't really "consume" a body. Probably lots of chunks chopped and scattered

---

What exactly does "consumed" mean if not: "lots of (body) chunks chopped and scattered"?

---

Based on username...


My presumption... Limbs were separated from the torso and maybe maybe not all entered the nacel. Whatever went in, was then tremendously chopped up by the outer fan blades. Being that it's a high bypass engine some solids might have passed through the bypass. Whatever went inside, towards the engine core, was further shredded by the rotating compressor vanes and stationary guide vanes. Depending on remaining moisture content this fine particulate and must was largely burned, but there's probably a lot of unburned "buildup" as the engine began to also disintegrate.

Plenty was burned since FD had to do the final extinguish on the engine fire.

I saw a small dog once get into I-45 in the Woodlands... 70mph SUV vs 10lb dog... There was a pink cloud of mist and not much else.

---

Agreed with everything you wrote. But if there was 1 word you had to use summarize your post, what's a better word to use than consumed? Everything I can come up with is, at best, synonymous.

---

Blendered?

jickyjack1 said:

---

I wonder how many investigation committees it will take the good leftist citizens of Denver to decide what runways are for?

---

Running. That's why they are called runways.

Just like driveways are made for driving and parkways are made for parking.

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

Consumed was used in the OP so I ran with it.

Ingested?

---

It's the right word to use, even if only partially consumed like the initial reports had. Some bozo claimed jet engines can't consume a body, but instead "chop and scatter" them as if that doesn't mean the same thing.

---

Consume as in destroy completely ut est "The fire consumed the house". Partially consumed is more accurate.

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Name calling?

---

Give him a break. If he doesn't want to defend his original post, let him walk it back.

---

Weird.

Dispute with facts and you are called a stalker.

Ex Ex Officio Director said:

---

Homeless guy?

---

Darwin Award Winner

GAC06 said:

---

Follow someone else around, weirdo

---

the irony

Ag with kids said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

High bypass turbofans don't really "consume" a body. Probably lots of chunks chopped and scattered

---

What exactly does "consumed" mean if not: "lots of (body) chunks chopped and scattered"?

---

Based on username...


My presumption... Limbs were separated from the torso and maybe maybe not all entered the nacel. Whatever went in, was then tremendously chopped up by the outer fan blades. Being that it's a high bypass engine some solids might have passed through the bypass. Whatever went inside, towards the engine core, was further shredded by the rotating compressor vanes and stationary guide vanes. Depending on remaining moisture content this fine particulate and must was largely burned, but there's probably a lot of unburned "buildup" as the engine began to also disintegrate.

Plenty was burned since FD had to do the final extinguish on the engine fire.

I saw a small dog once get into I-45 in the Woodlands... 70mph SUV vs 10lb dog... There was a pink cloud of mist and not much else.

---

Agreed with everything you wrote. But if there was 1 word you had to use summarize your post, what's a better word to use than consumed? Everything I can come up with is, at best, synonymous.

---

Blendered?

---

Dayum!

I just spewed coffee all over my iPad.

jickyjack1 said:

---

A friend once ran over a fellow who was lying, at night, on a Texas Farm to Market Road. My friend was shaken but the Highway Patrol who worked it said to him, "Beds are make to sleep in; roads are made for driving on". I wonder how many investigation committees it will take the good leftist citizens of Denver to decide what runways are for?

---

Remains to be seen.

Kenneth_2003 said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

High bypass turbofans don't really "consume" a body. Probably lots of chunks chopped and scattered

---

What exactly does "consumed" mean if not: "lots of (body) chunks chopped and scattered"?

---

Based on username...


My presumption... Limbs were separated from the torso and maybe maybe not all entered the nacel. Whatever went in, was then tremendously chopped up by the outer fan blades. Being that it's a high bypass engine some solids might have passed through the bypass. Whatever went inside, towards the engine core, was further shredded by the rotating compressor vanes and stationary guide vanes. Depending on remaining moisture content this fine particulate and must was largely burned, but there's probably a lot of unburned "buildup" as the engine began to also disintegrate.

Plenty was burned since FD had to do the final extinguish on the engine fire.

I saw a small dog once get into I-45 in the Woodlands... 70mph SUV vs 10lb dog... There was a pink cloud of mist and not much else.

---

I had an Uncle that was struck and killed by a "truck" on I-35 in the '70s. My mom told me that at some point and time after his death, she heard someone ask his widow about the condition of the body. I still recall my mom telling me that the widow said something to the effect of "you don't need to know." I don't know exactly what that meant (i.e. what she was referring to specifically), but she was indeed right.

Years later, I stumbled upon the accident report of the incident. Don't ask me how because I've forgotten and I didn't download or capture it. Anyway, the assumption WE (meaning extended family) always had was that the "truck" meant a large, 18-wheeler. Turns out it was a regular driver driving a pickup truck. Probably your average Ford or Chevy half-ton. I really hope that guy got over that. My uncle had no business being where he was (crossing the highway at night) and he was no doubt plastered.