Kansas Kid said:
Your argument has absolutely nothing to do with my comment that both sides gerrymander and the meme Annie put up originally is misleading. I other words, you can't show my analysis is wrong so let's deflect to another hot button issue.
Back to my original point, if you were to base total house representation off of popular vote for Harris v Trump, the Rs would have won 221 seats in the House on 2024. They won 222. If one side was that much better at Gerrymandering than the other, you wouldn't expect these numbers to be essentially the same.
Yes, gerrymandering happens and the meme is misleading.
There was no argument, I was making a point that gerrymandering works both ways. Getting seats by counting people who have no legal right to be in this country, is much, much worse. The dem party leadership supports these illegals strictly to gain more power; they don't actually care about these foreigners. If these foreigners were helping the Rs, the dem leadership would be anti-illegal immigration, like they were up until 15 years ago.
Your ORIGINAL point is that the Rs would have 221 seats instead of 222; One seat difference.
The Ds have
AT LEAST 4 seats by having the illegals counted in just california. This has been going on for numerous sessions. EVERY close vote lost by the Rs has been due to this. The D's have used illegals to change the course of this country from what the majority of citizens voted for.
