The View says the quiet part out loud: it's okay to vote for a Nazi if he's a Dem

6,119 Views | 90 Replies | Last: 12 hrs ago by AggieMD95
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mjschiller said:

The View are some of satans minions. They are evil

They have to be. That's their job. Do you think anyone in the private sector would hire them to do anything?
Arachnologistguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did not Kayne West say he was a Nazi or even Hitler? Politics and aggie football in an odd association on this one..
Geminiv
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Arachnologistguy said:

Did not Kayne West say he was a Nazi or even Hitler? Politics and aggie football in an odd association on this one..


Well you know thats different. He supports Trump so its ok. But this Graham guy? No way no pass dot him.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Geminiv said:

Arachnologistguy said:

Did not Kayne West say he was a Nazi or even Hitler? Politics and aggie football in an odd association on this one..


Well you know thats different. He supports Trump so its ok. But this Graham guy? No way no pass dot him.


Watching you bend over backwards to defend a literal women abusing Nazi against a moderate white woman is wild.
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Geminiv said:

Arachnologistguy said:

Did not Kayne West say he was a Nazi or even Hitler? Politics and aggie football in an odd association on this one..


Well you know thats different. He supports Trump so its ok. But this Graham guy? No way no pass dot him.


Watching you bend over backwards to defend a literal women abusing Nazi against a moderate white woman is wild.

You can't win with these people. They have been brainwashed to the point where voting for an abusive Nazi over a moderate female sitting senator is the better option.
Old Gorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Geminiv said:

Arachnologistguy said:

Did not Kayne West say he was a Nazi or even Hitler? Politics and aggie football in an odd association on this one..


Well you know thats different. He supports Trump so its ok. But this Graham guy? No way no pass dot him.


1991: No Republican in a leadership or influential elected position supports David Duke's campaign.

2026: John Fetterman is the only elected Democrat in Congress condemning Nepo Nazi.

After 80 plus years comparing every Republican to Hitler, the Democrat Party is now elevating a guy who names his unit after Hitler to the Senate.

But Trump!!! Good thing you weren't at Jonestown; you would have forced Reverend Jim to make more Koolaid.



LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SURPRISE!!!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dems have devolved into hating America, Trump, Jews, Christians and children then supporting wife beaters, racists, fascism and socialism.

But somehow they will save and protect democracy.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

So it's ok that Trump is literally Hitler if he were a Dem.

Dems are trash. National divorce!

Can you explain how a national divorce would work? I see a lot of people mention it, but they never seem to know how it would actually look from a practical perspective.

We work out who gets the kids and then we agree to not see or talk to each other ever again.

That's what I thought. What say we table the whole national divorce talk. It's really silly.

As soon as the Dem drop their hate for America we can get back to talking marriage counseling.

The path the Dems are on is a national divorce with domestic violence and ending in a Dateline series.

Dems need to seriously reconsider their path.

Ok great. I'm all ears. How would it work. Be specific.


I wouldn't bother if i were him. You are being completely disingenuous.

No I'm not. I'm asking a very reasonable question. Conservatives advocate for a national divorce frequently on this site, but no one has ever been able to articulate how that would realistically work. I'm genuinely curious.
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

This is truly stunning even for a democrat. He's a racist, liar, antisemite, Nazi, homophobe but you need to vote for him because Orange Man bad.

Not really. This is who they are now. The party of booger eating misfits.

They ran a candidate here in Texas, Maureen Galindo, a sex therapist who said this " A Democratic House candidate in Texas is facing widespread condemnation and accusations of antisemitism from both parties for comments she posted on social media, including a pledge to turn an immigration detention facility into a "prison for American Zionists" if elected.

They are wack jobs. Don't let them tell it is just the fringe and both sides have them.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

So it's ok that Trump is literally Hitler if he were a Dem.

Dems are trash. National divorce!

Can you explain how a national divorce would work? I see a lot of people mention it, but they never seem to know how it would actually look from a practical perspective.

We work out who gets the kids and then we agree to not see or talk to each other ever again.

That's what I thought. What say we table the whole national divorce talk. It's really silly.

As soon as the Dem drop their hate for America we can get back to talking marriage counseling.

The path the Dems are on is a national divorce with domestic violence and ending in a Dateline series.

Dems need to seriously reconsider their path.

Ok great. I'm all ears. How would it work. Be specific.


I wouldn't bother if i were him. You are being completely disingenuous.

No I'm not. I'm asking a very reasonable question. Conservatives advocate for a national divorce frequently on this site, but no one has ever been able to articulate how that would realistically work. I'm genuinely curious.

Dems either agree to go to intense counseling and reeducation therapy or more effective action would be taken.

But if you think those who love America are going to sit around and be verbally and physically abused by those who hate it, you are gravely mistaken. I don't advocate for violence in the name of politics. But Dems do and that's become a real problem.
Canvasback
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nazi's are right wing.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Canvasback said:

Nazi's are right wing.


National socialist party

Definitely left wing. Especially when you add in the antisemitism.
IIIHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Canvasback said:

Nazi's are right wing.


National socialist party

Definitely left wing. Especially when you add in the antisemitism.

The NAZI's were fascists.


( ...voice punctuated with a clap of distant thunder... )
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good point. Add that to the left wing column.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IIIHorn said:

Teslag said:

Canvasback said:

Nazi's are right wing.


National socialist party

Definitely left wing. Especially when you add in the antisemitism.

The NAZI's were fascists.

Are extreme libertarians right wing or left wing?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

IIIHorn said:

Teslag said:

Canvasback said:

Nazi's are right wing.


National socialist party

Definitely left wing. Especially when you add in the antisemitism.

The NAZI's were fascists.

Are extreme libertarians right wing or left wing?

By definition they would be NEITHER.

If you don't want to subscribe to government oversight of anything then how do you subscribe to party oversight?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

IIIHorn said:

Teslag said:

Canvasback said:

Nazi's are right wing.


National socialist party

Definitely left wing. Especially when you add in the antisemitism.

The NAZI's were fascists.

Are extreme libertarians right wing or left wing?

Italians were fascists. Germans were a unique flavor of fascism along with being a unique flavor of socialists. Europeans call that right wing. It is not a similar concept in the US and never has been, but libs are devoid of historical knowledge outside of they believe all people of lesser elitism and of more color are subhuman subjects of their relentless power.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

So it's ok that Trump is literally Hitler if he were a Dem.

Dems are trash. National divorce!

Can you explain how a national divorce would work? I see a lot of people mention it, but they never seem to know how it would actually look from a practical perspective.

We work out who gets the kids and then we agree to not see or talk to each other ever again.

That's what I thought. What say we table the whole national divorce talk. It's really silly.

As soon as the Dem drop their hate for America we can get back to talking marriage counseling.

The path the Dems are on is a national divorce with domestic violence and ending in a Dateline series.

Dems need to seriously reconsider their path.

Ok great. I'm all ears. How would it work. Be specific.


I wouldn't bother if i were him. You are being completely disingenuous.

No I'm not. I'm asking a very reasonable question. Conservatives advocate for a national divorce frequently on this site, but no one has ever been able to articulate how that would realistically work. I'm genuinely curious.

Dems either agree to go to intense counseling and reeducation therapy or more effective action would be taken.

But if you think those who love America are going to sit around and be verbally and physically abused by those who hate it, you are gravely mistaken. I don't advocate for violence in the name of politics. But Dems do and that's become a real problem.

All you had to say was, "I want a national divorce but I don't know how it would be accomplished from a purely practical perspective."
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

So it's ok that Trump is literally Hitler if he were a Dem.

Dems are trash. National divorce!

Can you explain how a national divorce would work? I see a lot of people mention it, but they never seem to know how it would actually look from a practical perspective.

We work out who gets the kids and then we agree to not see or talk to each other ever again.

That's what I thought. What say we table the whole national divorce talk. It's really silly.

As soon as the Dem drop their hate for America we can get back to talking marriage counseling.

The path the Dems are on is a national divorce with domestic violence and ending in a Dateline series.

Dems need to seriously reconsider their path.

Ok great. I'm all ears. How would it work. Be specific.


I wouldn't bother if i were him. You are being completely disingenuous.

No I'm not. I'm asking a very reasonable question. Conservatives advocate for a national divorce frequently on this site, but no one has ever been able to articulate how that would realistically work. I'm genuinely curious.

Dems either agree to go to intense counseling and reeducation therapy or more effective action would be taken.

But if you think those who love America are going to sit around and be verbally and physically abused by those who hate it, you are gravely mistaken. I don't advocate for violence in the name of politics. But Dems do and that's become a real problem.

All you had to say was, "I want a national divorce but I don't know how it would be accomplished from a purely practical perspective."

Thanks. It's always good on a discussion forum to ask a question of someone, let them answer, then tell them how they should have answered.

I think you showed exactly why a national divorce is needed.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Canvasback said:

Nazi's are right wing.


Your party is running a Nazi and telling its voters via their paid propaganda engines to ignore their conscience and vote for him anyway because he's a Dem
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Dems have devolved into hating America, Trump, Jews, Christians and children then supporting wife beaters, racists, fascism and socialism.

But somehow they will save and protect democracy.

Democrats also love Islam now for some reason.
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Logos Stick said:

So it's ok that Trump is literally Hitler if he were a Dem.

Dems are trash. National divorce!

Can you explain how a national divorce would work? I see a lot of people mention it, but they never seem to know how it would actually look from a practical perspective.

We work out who gets the kids and then we agree to not see or talk to each other ever again.

That's what I thought. What say we table the whole national divorce talk. It's really silly.

As soon as the Dem drop their hate for America we can get back to talking marriage counseling.

The path the Dems are on is a national divorce with domestic violence and ending in a Dateline series.

Dems need to seriously reconsider their path.

Ok great. I'm all ears. How would it work. Be specific.


I wouldn't bother if i were him. You are being completely disingenuous.

No I'm not. I'm asking a very reasonable question. Conservatives advocate for a national divorce frequently on this site, but no one has ever been able to articulate how that would realistically work. I'm genuinely curious.

Dems either agree to go to intense counseling and reeducation therapy or more effective action would be taken.

But if you think those who love America are going to sit around and be verbally and physically abused by those who hate it, you are gravely mistaken. I don't advocate for violence in the name of politics. But Dems do and that's become a real problem.


That is a real problem. If that communist took out Trump in PA we would be in a Civil War right now.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


Do you really want to find out? I don't.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacifico said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


Do you really want to find out? I don't.

Which is why I think this overly emotional squawking about a national divorce and civil war is so asinine. It's an archetypal example of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Pardon the cliche, but it fits.

And 80% of the population just doesn't care enough to take that step. Fortunately the overwhelming anger and resentment displayed on Texags on a daily basis doesn't represent the feelings of the country as a whole. Most people just want to live their lives and be left alone.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


It would have started with tit for tat political assassinations. Which would have gotten ugly.
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Pacifico said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


Do you really want to find out? I don't.

Which is why I think this overly emotional squawking about a national divorce and civil war is so asinine. It's an archetypal example of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Pardon the cliche, but it fits.

And 80% of the population just doesn't care enough to take that step. Fortunately the overwhelming anger and resentment displayed on Texags on a daily basis doesn't represent the feelings of the country as a whole. Most people just want to live their lives and be left alone.



80% of Americans can't agree on anything.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


It would have started with tit for tat political assassinations. Which would have gotten ugly.

What would've started? The civil war? Ok, cool. Now we're getting somewhere. How would this civil war progress? Just you and your buddies capping people on the street you assume are liberal?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

BusterAg said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


It would have started with tit for tat political assassinations. Which would have gotten ugly.

What would've started? The civil war? Ok, cool. Now we're getting somewhere. How would this civil war progress? Just you and your buddies capping people on the street you assume are liberal?



Capping people for political beliefs if what your side does. Today. In broad daylight.
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Geminiv said:

Arachnologistguy said:

Did not Kayne West say he was a Nazi or even Hitler? Politics and aggie football in an odd association on this one..


Well you know thats different. He supports Trump so its ok. But this Graham guy? No way no pass dot him.

BIG difference between a white Nazi and a black Nazi. One is a-okay, the other is not. Same with a Democrat Nazi versus a Republican Nazi. I'm sure you already knew that, though.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Pacifico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

BusterAg said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


It would have started with tit for tat political assassinations. Which would have gotten ugly.

What would've started? The civil war? Ok, cool. Now we're getting somewhere. How would this civil war progress? Just you and your buddies capping people on the street you assume are liberal?


Violence. Violence is how it will work. Have I solved this mystery for you?
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

BusterAg said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


It would have started with tit for tat political assassinations. Which would have gotten ugly.

What would've started? The civil war? Ok, cool. Now we're getting somewhere. How would this civil war progress? Just you and your buddies capping people on the street you assume are liberal?



Capping people for political beliefs if what your side does. Today. In broad daylight.

Ok, so Buster & Coop seem to be insinuating that if President Trump had been assassinated it would've sparked a civil war. Now you seem to be suggesting that's not the case. So again…

If we take the obviously ridiculous step of a national divorce or civil war, how would it play out? And even if you did have a rational & well thought out strategy, how would that not result in the United States burning itself to the ground allowing China to absorb what's left?
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Pacifico said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

flown-the-coop said:

I absolutely believe that would be the case. That is how close we came. And we are not back far from that.

And how would that work exactly? Also, how long do you think it would take for China to take full advantage of a goofy U.S. civil war?


Do you really want to find out? I don't.

Which is why I think this overly emotional squawking about a national divorce and civil war is so asinine. It's an archetypal example of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Pardon the cliche, but it fits.

And 80% of the population just doesn't care enough to take that step. Fortunately the overwhelming anger and resentment displayed on Texags on a daily basis doesn't represent the feelings of the country as a whole. Most people just want to live their lives and be left alone.


AKSHUALLY, I think the highlighted part is demonstrably incorrect. First point of reference is the continuous electing of Democrats into office. If "most people", which would be the majority, BTW, actually just want to live and be left alone, they wouldn't be electing these meddlesome jackwagons to ANY office.

I do agree that most people don't care enough, or are too lazy, to take the first step. But it doesn't take a majority to start a war, just enough who are done with the way things are going and with the fortitude or insanity to take up arms against the Government.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.