Ag with kids said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

#4 and final today is Trump v. Miot & Mullin v. Doe

6-3 by Justice Alito

Commie girl squad dissents

Quote:

---

Whether the Trump administration can end the Temporary Protected Status program for Haitian nationals (Miot) and Syrian nationals (Mullin).

The court holds that the Syrian and Haitian nationals are not "entitled to orders postponing the terminations during litigation."

The Supreme Court first holds that courts cannot review the Haitian and Syrian nationals' non-constitutional claims, because the TPS statute bars judicial review.

The court next holds that the Haitian nationals' constitutional claim, that the decision to terminate TPS status for Haiti was based on racial discrimination, "will likely fail."

---

---

What are the dissents based on for this and the asylum case? Feelz?

---

I don't have time to read the dissent, but I'm sure its likely of feelz and some "muh, racism" thrown in.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-1083_f204.pdf

---

Yep...just perused it a bit. The "muh racism" was there.

They conclude that a bunch of statements like "****hole countries" etc were inherently racist...

Seems pretty racist to me to think only blacks live in ****hole countries...

---

That's why they were pissed when he took South Africans.

Rapier108 said:

---

First today is Monsanto v. Durnell.

7-2 by Justice Kavanaugh

Jackson dissents, joined by Gorsuch

Quote:

---

This is a case about whether a federal law the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act that regulates the use, sale, and labeling of pesticides bars a lawsuit against Monsanto, the maker of Roundup weedkiller, for failing to include a warning on the label about the risks of cancer. The EPA did not require Monsanto to include such a warning, and the agency has said that the active ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, does NOT cause cancer.

The court holds that FIFRA preempts (that is, trumps) Durnell's claim under state law.

The court reverses the ruling by the Missouri Court of Appeals for Durnell and sends the case back to the lower court for "further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion."

Justice Thomas has a concurring opinion "to call attention to some of the underlying constitutional infirmities" in FIFRA.

---

---

Good for Monsanto/Bayer. The RoundUp witch hunt has to end.

I took a look at this. It's a good outcome, but let me fill you in on a few facts so you understand how crazy it is that we had to litigate this at all.

In 2016, there was such a huge surge of migrants on the border that DHS couldn't possibly process them all. So it set limits,… https://t.co/RQIyxTRm3p

— FischerKing (@FischerKing64) June 25, 2026

In a sense, that irreparable sovereign harm of having been hauled to court to litigate dozens of TPS lawsuits that were not subject to judicial review was awful. It is a shame that it took so long to resolve.

Read the docket here: https://t.co/QQred2dbYk

— Eric W. (@EWess92) June 25, 2026

The Supreme Court slapped down a Hawaiian law that infringed on the Second Amendment. Justice Jackson, in her dissent, started quoting Hawaiian law from when it was a separate Kingdom. LOL

"Since its time as a sovereign kingdom, Hawaii has never permitted the widespread carrying…

— Pino Americano (@PinoAmericano) June 25, 2026

Wow. Haven't read these yet.

You will take my Roundup from me when you pry my sprayer from my cold dead hands.

nortex97 said:

---

The Supreme Court slapped down a Hawaiian law that infringed on the Second Amendment. Justice Jackson, in her dissent, started quoting Hawaiian law from when it was a separate Kingdom. LOL

"Since its time as a sovereign kingdom, Hawaii has never permitted the widespread carrying…

— Pino Americano (@PinoAmericano) June 25, 2026

Wow. Haven't read these yet.

---

Gee, does that mean the British law applies here in the US because the 13 colonies had to follow their law 250 years ago?

nortex97 said:

---

The Supreme Court slapped down a Hawaiian law that infringed on the Second Amendment. Justice Jackson, in her dissent, started quoting Hawaiian law from when it was a separate Kingdom. LOL

"Since its time as a sovereign kingdom, Hawaii has never permitted the widespread carrying…

— Pino Americano (@PinoAmericano) June 25, 2026

Wow. Haven't read these yet.

---

Whoever is (behind the curtain) writing every single thing she says or "writes", needs to pull back a little. She can play the role of DEI 2000% idiot without any more help.

Im Gipper said:

---

So great from Alito!

Quote:

---

"The Second Amendment has the same meaning in all parts of the United States. It cannot give way to "the spirit of Aloha" in Hawaii any more than it can yield to the spirit of the Big Apple or the Windy City. "

---

---

Refreshing to see a judge/justice actually believe in the Constitution.

Great WSJ opinion article on the persistence of Thomas to move the 2nd Amendment from the status of a 'disfavored Constitutional right' to being supported by the numerous rulings impacting the 2A starting with Heller, followed by 12 years of near silence by the SCOTUS, through Wolford.

The article credits Thomas' persistence even in dissenting opinions to gradually move the SCOTUS to where we landed yesterday with Wolford

Few people have been more consequential to saving our 1st and 2nd amendment rights over the last 100 years. God bless this man.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/thomass-constitutional-firepower-023419f8?mod=opinion_lead_pos8