***Week Three Start/Sit/Waivers***

15,504 Views | 346 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Ag_07
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATL with another chance to steal this one. I need London to catch the game winner
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

ATL with another chance to steal this one. I need London to catch the game winner

This is also my fantasy
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well that wasn't great
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
one thing about Cousins...

he does not spread the ball around

locks in on his WR1 and WR2
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
17 carries for Carson Steele
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unlike Dak Prescott, who only threw 7 of his 51 pass attempts towards his WR1 today
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Steele runs hard. But he's not elusive and not fast and will get approximately zero targets in the passing game.
Brother Shamus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lamb has been trash - last week he was okay but overall not good.
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm down 8 and my opponent is done.
My FLEX is left to play, Higgins or Ekeler? (PPR League)
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is tough. With the way this week has gone maybe start the 2nd string WAS TE instead lol.

I'd probably go ekeler and count on him getting 4 catches
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You only need 8 in ppr- I think ekeler has the higher floor, lower ceiling. Game script is likely Daniels and WAS playing from behind. Ekeler can get a handful of grabs easily. Higgins floor is 0 if hammy acts up.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fingers crossed...Higgins makes it through pre-game warm-ups uninjured
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm down 20. My opponent has James Cook and I have Josh Allen and Keon Coleman. Chances?
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VERY slim

I doubt Coleman will get you there assuming that Cook and Allen probably come close to cancelling each other out.
btk55
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Going to lose with Saquon and Taylor in my lineup…

Freaking Ridley, J. Williams, and Likely combining for 4.5 points.

Need a Monday night miracle from Allen and Higgins.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What y'all thinking re: TEs for ROS? Seems that every single TE has a floor of next to nil in any given week.

PPR points so far:

Week 1 top 4 (with weeks 2 and 3):
Likely: 26.10, 4.60, 1.40
Moreau: 14.30, 0.00, 1.20
Bowers: 11.80, 18.80, 7.10
Pitts: 11.60, 5.00, 7.90

Week 2 top 4 (with weeks 1 and 3):
Kittle: 8.00, 20.60, 0.00 (o)
Henry: 3.80, 18.90, 2.90
Bowers: 11.80, 18.80, 7.10
McBride: 8.00, 18.70, 5.50

Week 3 top 4 (with weeks 1 and 2):
Goedert: 7.10, 6.80, 27.00
Kmet: 1.40, 6.70, 25.70
Ferguson: 4.50, 0.00 (o), 15.50
Conklin: 1.60, 2.00, 14.30

Top 4 TEs by ppr ADP:
Laporta: 8.50, 3.30, 5.60
Kelce: 6.40, 1.60, 7.00
McBride: 8.00, 18.70, 5.50
Andrews: 3.40, 9.10, 0.00
btk55
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Think I'd rank the top 5 as:

Kittle
McBride
Laporta
Bowers
Ferguson

It's really ugly. Hockenson might jump back into top 2 upon his return. Goedert likely to see more success, especially if Smith misses any time.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hock is likely out until week 7 or so apparently.

Also since he is coming off an ACL and MCL tear, I fear it is unlikely that he returns to form this season, but given what TE looks like this year, he is worth an IR slot for anyone who has one open.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Could potentially flip Drake London and Jonathan Brooks for Malik Nabers...thoughts?
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

Could potentially flip Drake London and Jonathan Brooks for Malik Nabers...thoughts?

Umm...Yeah

Cousins and that ATL offense don't look too hot and Brooks will be coming back from injury with question marks about that offense.

Meanwhile Nabers is getting fed.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can get the number 1 WR on the season for a WR 20 and a rookie RB who hasn't been cleared from a major knee injury. What is there to think about?
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texagbeliever said:

You can get the number 1 WR on the season for a WR 20 and a rookie RB who hasn't been cleared from a major knee injury. What is there to think about?
Agree with what you and Ag_07 are saying.

Just considering it all.

London has been good, I could see that offense improving as Kirk continues to get further from his surgery. I also think Brooks will be good with Dalton in there, but who knows if that becomes a timeshare or if Young is slotted back in at some point.

I am also a bit nervous about Nabers being attached to Daniel Jones and having no other decent WR options in NY and wondering if the last two outings are a product of his elite upside or mediocre opposing defenses.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm holding Brooks in my IR spot in two leagues, but if you have a chance at Nabers, get him STAT!

No guarantee Brooks, being a rookie coming off injury, even if he was the first RB taken in the draft, will quickly jump Chuba and Sanders during the year this year, and even if he does, CAR is still not a good team, regardless of how much better they looked in week 3 after finally benching Bryce Young. Heck, if i have any more injuries on my squad and as bye weeks start approaching for QB, TE, etc., I might end up having to drop Brooks to waivers at some point. I'd consider Nabers a humungous upgrade at WR over London and not worry about the hopeful IR stash on your bench.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If someone offered you London & Brooks for Nabers you should feel insulted. That is how lopsided it is. Sure you could what if a scenario where London comes back. But right now, Nabers is a stud and has no competition. London has to make sure Bijan, Pitts & Mooney don't take the targets.
ac04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

What y'all thinking re: TEs for ROS? Seems that every single TE has a floor of next to nil in any given week.
probably something like

mcbride
kittle
laporta
bowers
kincaid
pitts
kelce
ferguson
goedert
engram
likely

i don't feel very good about any of them past bowers
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i do think I feel ok about Mcbride in one league, despite the dud and concussion in week 3 and potential for missing week 4.. i feel really really bad about Mark Andrews in my other league.
ac04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

VERY slim

I doubt Coleman will get you there assuming that Cook and Allen probably come close to cancelling each other out.
6 pt QB TD for what it's worth. The hope is that Coleman at least comes close to Cook and Allen can take care of the rest
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

You only need 8 in ppr- I think ekeler has the higher floor, lower ceiling. Game script is likely Daniels and WAS playing from behind. Ekeler can get a handful of grabs easily. Higgins floor is 0 if hammy acts up.

I decided to roll with Ekeler just given the fact Higgins coming off that hammy injury. Too easy to tweak first time to play live ball of the season.
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

VERY slim

I doubt Coleman will get you there assuming that Cook and Allen probably come close to cancelling each other out.
Slim just walked thru the MF'ing door
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kliff is good
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nice!

I was just about to go see what they all did to see how that worked out.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.