FLATOUT said:
maroon barchetta said:
If you've been reading the auto board then you know the consensus on add-ons that weren't agreed upon during initial sales negotiations Especially when the Keating dealership intentionally gouges elderly people.
"Everybody does it" sucks as an excuse. Absolutely sucks. I would imagine most people here expected a better defense. But I'm sure it's part of the company culture at this point.
Why would anyone choose to buy something that wasn't agreed upon? You do have a choice to purchase or not purchase something.
This response does you no favors. We all know the common practice is that after a customer has likely spent hours at the dealership by now, they've agreed to a deal, and at this point, they are mentally invested in the vehicle they chose and the deal they made. Then, as they near the finish line on paperwork, they get presented with additional items that "can't" just be waived because "they've already been added to the car" or "they came with the car".
Walking at this point is very difficult for a customer, and you know this because that's why it is often done this way. Seems to be very common practice to get the customer as far as possible in the process before springing these profit-driving nuggets on them
It's shady and predatory. But sure, the customer has a choice. Their choice should be to never set foot in one of your dealerships to buy something. I agree with you on that