Not to overtake the other thread, but I feel this paper was useful:
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A11449434-b6c7-4025-a3b4-f4363988d91f&fbclid=IwAR0kJpBI4ieA_BUXbbY_pYkoJL9ffEqQ9c90p8fpaHXMQhor9j8HOWHcUJY#pageNum=1
It hold about 295 pages worth of sources and information of what we know of Sully's life and beliefs. I think in the introduction of the paper the writer sums it up pretty well:
You can search for keywords if you are looking for a specific topic.
Point is, history is messy, 10 out of 12 of our first Presidents owned slaves at some point in their lives. Sully never owned slaves, although his father owned at least 2 or 3 at some point in his life, it is speculated in the paper that these were inherited from his mother (Sully's grandmother) and the rest had been freed upon her death.
There is plenty of sources of Sullivan advancing black public education, offering awards for the arrests of people who had murdered black people while he was governor.
I'm not going to get into all of it, but point being this isn't really about Sullivan Ross the person, this is about a statue, and here is the question being asked:
Does the statue represent the confederacy or white supremacy (to be clear, Ross was never a member of the Ku Klux Klan, as I've seen that allegation thrown around), simply because Ross fought with and eventually lead a Texas Regiment in the Confederacy when he was in his 20's?
I would argue this is a very broad over simplification, and that the statue was never installed for that purpose.
But take a look at this information, decide for yourself.
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A11449434-b6c7-4025-a3b4-f4363988d91f&fbclid=IwAR0kJpBI4ieA_BUXbbY_pYkoJL9ffEqQ9c90p8fpaHXMQhor9j8HOWHcUJY#pageNum=1
It hold about 295 pages worth of sources and information of what we know of Sully's life and beliefs. I think in the introduction of the paper the writer sums it up pretty well:
Quote:
The known record is not adequate to make confident conclusions about Ross' feelings about and actions concerning race and ethnicity. Even less is known about his views on gender or class. Anyone who examines these references hoping to find either a demon or an angel will be disappointed. Life is complicated, and Sul Ross led a very full life
You can search for keywords if you are looking for a specific topic.
Point is, history is messy, 10 out of 12 of our first Presidents owned slaves at some point in their lives. Sully never owned slaves, although his father owned at least 2 or 3 at some point in his life, it is speculated in the paper that these were inherited from his mother (Sully's grandmother) and the rest had been freed upon her death.
There is plenty of sources of Sullivan advancing black public education, offering awards for the arrests of people who had murdered black people while he was governor.
I'm not going to get into all of it, but point being this isn't really about Sullivan Ross the person, this is about a statue, and here is the question being asked:
Does the statue represent the confederacy or white supremacy (to be clear, Ross was never a member of the Ku Klux Klan, as I've seen that allegation thrown around), simply because Ross fought with and eventually lead a Texas Regiment in the Confederacy when he was in his 20's?
I would argue this is a very broad over simplification, and that the statue was never installed for that purpose.
But take a look at this information, decide for yourself.