I tried looking on YouTube myself, but really only found this years Georgia game. This targeting call absolutely needs to be added to the list. Right after that joke of a call in 2011.
Any highlight reels of curious tu calls over the years?
6,898 Views |
82 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by Muy
Don't forget the knee was down in 2005.
Don't forget the horrible UH spot in recent years.
Players entire body over the line but they called him short.
If memory serves tu lineman pushed the ref back who was spotting the ball.
Players entire body over the line but they called him short.
If memory serves tu lineman pushed the ref back who was spotting the ball.
Remember #4 (name escapes me) that celebrated no calls on Twitter?
Hell, the no push off rule was created for him.
Edit: he is in the gif below. Roy?
Hell, the no push off rule was created for him.
Edit: he is in the gif below. Roy?
Targeting on Notre Dame
I thought this was obvious and blatant.
Why have a targeting rule if you are going to call obvious targeting in the biggest games?
— Jay Feely (@jayfeely) January 1, 2025
How could they look at this and deem it not targeting???
pic.twitter.com/GhJVMHAvMy
Their regional-winning run against my hometown Lamar Cardinals in 1984. This "run" got them to the College World Series. I can remember listening to this on the radio when I was 12 yo.
Anyone calling this a conspiracy can kindly go **** themselves
Been happening forever.
Even against other blue bloods such as OU.
Their entire existence is based on it.
Here's the harder scavenger hunt. Find a big game they won without help from the refs.
Even against other blue bloods such as OU.
Their entire existence is based on it.
Here's the harder scavenger hunt. Find a big game they won without help from the refs.
Today's call is up there with the Big 12 Championship where Colt McCoy threw the ball out of bounds to end the game, only to have refs add back a second.
Re: "Here's the harder scavenger hunt. Find a big game they won without help from the refs."
Not a big game, but years ago... NTSU (UNT?) vs tu in Austin... there was a bs call (or non-call) that resulted in a tu win (may have negated a NTSU td).
Will search for it.
Not a big game, but years ago... NTSU (UNT?) vs tu in Austin... there was a bs call (or non-call) that resulted in a tu win (may have negated a NTSU td).
Will search for it.
Trajan88 said:
Re: "Here's the harder scavenger hunt. Find a big game they won without help from the refs."
Not a big game, but years ago... NTSU (UNT?) vs tu in Austin... there was a bs call (or non-call) that resulted in a tu win (may have negated a NTSU td).
Will search for it.
I was not only at that game but also on the field that day. The Texas WR who caught the TD pass was *at least* two full yards out of bounds. Not two inches or two feet...two YARDS. You know that dashed line around the field that media members must stay behind? The WR was significantly closer to that line when he came down than he was to the sidelines.
But those who hope in the LORD will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint. Isaiah 40:31 (NIV)
It's a long list
2004 vs Kansas- bogus offensive PI call negates KU 1st down & run out clock & defeat the scumbags.
Mark Mangino goes ballistic post game - says Big 12 rigging the deal puts sips in Rose Bowl
2004 vs Kansas- bogus offensive PI call negates KU 1st down & run out clock & defeat the scumbags.
Mark Mangino goes ballistic post game - says Big 12 rigging the deal puts sips in Rose Bowl
dabo man said:
Their regional-winning run against my hometown Lamar Cardinals in 1984. This "run" got them to the College World Series. I can remember listening to this on the radio when I was 12 yo.
Let us not forget all three Dave Yeast calls in 2008.
Yes, but I recorded that video to VHS in 1986, digitized it in 2003, and made a .gif of it myself years later. It's near and dear to my heart.
I do remember Yeast though.
I do remember Yeast though.
Famous "incomplete" call on interception in the 1963 game against tu.
It's a long list
2004 vs Kansas- bogus offensive PI call negates KU 1st down to run out clock & defeat the scumbags.
Mark Mangino goes ballistic post game - says Big 12 rigging the deal puts sips in Rose Bowl
2004 vs Kansas- bogus offensive PI call negates KU 1st down to run out clock & defeat the scumbags.
Mark Mangino goes ballistic post game - says Big 12 rigging the deal puts sips in Rose Bowl
Why was this not called targeting? Everybody get your panties out of your crack. It was an equally called game. The refs let the players determine the game. The conspiracy theorist are whacked out. Probably believe the earth is flat.
The true missed targeting call of the game. Dude literally lunged to the head/neck of Isaiah Bond. pic.twitter.com/r3iYp9Z4cC
— J❌red. (@SerJaredd) January 2, 2025
One of you nerds with nothing better to do needs to make this highlight reel with all of the rigged calls in sip favor. This will need to be ongoing because there are still a lot to come.
Subtlety is the secret to a quality troll. Equating to "flat earth conspiracy theorists" is not subtle.
HTH
HTH
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Then why don't they "let the players determine" every game? Why does that become the priority in playoff games? Taafe actually got away with another targeting earlier. It was the play where he was injured with an obvious neck stinger. He initiated contact with the crown on that play, and suffered a neck injury due to that. Why is targeting out the window in playoff games, but important in all other games? Why are you ok with that?
I do agree with you on this. What don't they always let players determine the game? That's football for you. Your never going to get consistency. Human error comes into play.
Try to find the fourth quarter of some of their games against Oklahoma State from 2009, 2010ish etc.
When slowed down it showed that the defender led with his shoulder and first contacted the receiver's chest, and then slid up to the head, which produced the appearance of targeting. The rules analyst explained it pretty much this way in his conclusion that this shouldn't be called.classof92 said:
Why was this not called targeting? Everybody get your panties out of your crack. It was an equally called game. The refs let the players determine the game. The conspiracy theorist are whacked out. Probably believe the earth is flat.The true missed targeting call of the game. Dude literally lunged to the head/neck of Isaiah Bond. pic.twitter.com/r3iYp9Z4cC
— J❌red. (@SerJaredd) January 2, 2025
Well then ESPN disagrees with you. They were talking about it on the morning show. As they said, let the players determine the game.
Final penalty stats for the game were as follows
Texas 10 - 67
ASU 6 - 50
Final penalty stats for the game were as follows
Texas 10 - 67
ASU 6 - 50
Bill Superman said:
One of you nerds with nothing better to do needs to make this highlight reel with all of the rigged calls in sip favor. This will need to be ongoing because there are still a lot to come.
This. I'm shocked it doesn't exist already
Those two plays were not even remotely the same.
The final stats don't indicate that game altering penalties were not called.
You are wrong. Just admit it wasn't targeting and move on. But we know you won't.
Here is a clear example of targeting since you need some help:
Here is a clear example of targeting since you need some help:
Why have a targeting rule if you are going to call obvious targeting in the biggest games?
— Jay Feely (@jayfeely) January 1, 2025
How could they look at this and deem it not targeting???
pic.twitter.com/GhJVMHAvMy
I know right, it's hilarious how the sips move the goal posts to total penalties called is somehow an indicator of gross negligence of targeting non-calls.TexasRebel said:
The final stats don't indicate that game altering penalties were not called.
ESPN is arguing this to serve their own interests?classof92 said:
Well then ESPN disagrees with you. They were talking about it on the morning show. As they said, let the players determine the game.
Final penalty stats for the game were as follows
Texas 10 - 67
ASU 6 - 50
Shocking...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Helmet to helmet contact is not targeting. Targeting is lowering the helmet to launch into another player like a missile.
If what Taafe did was targeting then you could call targeting on every play and there'd be no games because every single player would be ejected for targeting. College football happens fast.
If what Taafe did was targeting then you could call targeting on every play and there'd be no games because every single player would be ejected for targeting. College football happens fast.
Well Scott Van Pelt disagrees with you.classof92 said:
Well then ESPN disagrees with you. They were talking about it on the morning show. As they said, let the players determine the game.
Final penalty stats for the game were as follows
Texas 10 - 67
ASU 6 - 50
"If that's a 1:00 window game between a couple of ACC or any conference (teams)... that's targeting 100 times out of 100. It wasn't in this case," said Van Pelt
^^^ This right here. Shoulder to the chest via slow-mo look. Blew him up so hard it whipped his head back. So if it looks like targeting on the other team, the whorns want it called. But not when it actually IS targeting by them.Nelson Wilbury said:When slowed down it showed that the defender led with his shoulder and first contacted the receiver's chest, and then slid up to the head, which produced the appearance of targeting. The rules analyst explained it pretty much this way in his conclusion that this shouldn't be called.classof92 said:
Why was this not called targeting? Everybody get your panties out of your crack. It was an equally called game. The refs let the players determine the game. The conspiracy theorist are whacked out. Probably believe the earth is flat.The true missed targeting call of the game. Dude literally lunged to the head/neck of Isaiah Bond. pic.twitter.com/r3iYp9Z4cC
— J❌red. (@SerJaredd) January 2, 2025
You're right. The final score does.TexasRebel said:
The final stats don't indicate that game altering penalties were not called.
Featured Stories
See All
A&M's growing 2026 class features pledges from across the country
by Ryan Brauninger
21:35
1d ago
5.4k
6:21
2h ago
555
Buzz Williams' Ags are proving why experience, continuity still matter
by Luke Evangelist