It just depends on how old you are.

If you are young, they have dominated us 11-3 since 2000.
If you are middle aged, its 18-16 sips since 1980

if you are old, they dominated us.

since 2010
sips
3
1

Since 2000
sips
11
3

Since 1990
sips
15
9

Since 1980
sips
18
16

Since 1970
sips
25
19

Since 1960
sips
34
20

Since 1950
sips
42
22

Because we seemingly allow it.

offenseguru said:

---

Until we build a roster equivalent to or better we will mostly get the same results. U don't win big games consistently against superior rosters.

---

Superior roster?

They have a couple spots I would take over ours, but I wouldn't want a single player from their secondary, OL, WR's, RB's, or QB over what we have.

We played a bad game and they played like it was the superbowl. Not much more to it than that. It sucks we lost, but we have far more to play for. They had nothing else to play for.

Rent better players.

Heineken-Ashi said:

---

offenseguru said:

---

Until we build a roster equivalent to or better we will mostly get the same results. U don't win big games consistently against superior rosters.

---

Superior roster?

They have a couple spots I would take over ours, but I wouldn't want a single player from their secondary, OL, WR's, RB's, or QB over what we have.

We played a bad game and they played like it was the superbowl. Not much more to it than that. It sucks we lost, but we have far more to play for. They had nothing else to play for.

---

They've put 10+ players into the NFL Draft the past 2 years, and likely get close to doing it again this year.

We haven't been anywhere near that. This year will be the first. And after this year, I seriously doubt we do it back to back years the following year.
We're just not built up that way quite yet.

So pound for pound, top to bottom, their roster as a whole probably IS better than ours right now, actually