tigerag said:
Y'all wouldn't be surprised if you knew how many replay officials are t-shirt sips.
Eugene Semko, the late infamous Jon Bible....are there more?
Go Blue
23,881 Views |
220 Replies |
Last: 3 mo ago by Danny Vermin
Angry Jonathan Zaludek
Joined:
May 25, 2009
Posts:
8,656
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eugene Semko, the late infamous Jon Bible....are there more?
Past few crowd shots
I want this to happen to more SEC teams so they get what they deserve for voting them in.
It's really almost comical how badly A&M football has been harmed by targeting calls over the years.
Then you see texas never get them, and you wonder if maybe there isn't something to the idea that they just flat get calls other schools don't. I tuned in at the start of the 3rd, and I've already seen them get three 15 yard calls their way.
Then you see texas never get them, and you wonder if maybe there isn't something to the idea that they just flat get calls other schools don't. I tuned in at the start of the 3rd, and I've already seen them get three 15 yard calls their way.
good throw there right to tu....
Damn, M 55 laid the boom on that guy that got the INT.
NeverSeenEmWin said:
It's really almost comical how badly A&M football has been harmed by targeting calls over the years.
Then you see texas never get them, and you wonder if maybe there isn't something to the idea that they just flat get calls other schools don't. I tuned in at the start of the 3rd, and I've already seen them get three 15 yard calls their way.
Didn't a guy get in trouble on GameDay for basically saying, "Look at every team Bama has played this year. Their best defender gets ejected for targeting against Bama and/or the week before they play Bama in the second half."
I feel like the targeting rule (and with how loosely it was defined and upheld) was made to help certain teams and punish others.
NeverSeenEmWin said:
It's really almost comical how badly A&M football has been harmed by targeting calls over the years.
Then you see texas never get them, and you wonder if maybe there isn't something to the idea that they just flat get calls other schools don't. I tuned in at the start of the 3rd, and I've already seen them get three 15 yard calls their way.
It is bad when it is OBVIOUS.
Aggies2009 said:
I want this to happen to more SEC teams so they get what they deserve for voting them in.
I have said this many times and they almost did it to GA in Austin last year. Kirby even said as much in his post game interview.
I hate how the referees in this game call questionable calls against Michigan but miss blatant calls, such as a targeting on a Michigan player.
How was that not targeting on Texas earlier? Laughable
Iraq2xVeteran said:
I hate how the referees in this game call questionable calls against Michigan but miss blatant calls, such as a targeting on a Michigan player.
First time watching a t-sip game?
deer corn said:Aggies2009 said:
I want this to happen to more SEC teams so they get what they deserve for voting them in.
I have said this many times and they almost did it to GA in Austin last year. Kirby even said as much in his post game interview.
It happened to Kentucky in Softball and they got cheated out of a win. There were a few times tehy got cheated in football.
Good.
Aggies2009 said:NeverSeenEmWin said:
It's really almost comical how badly A&M football has been harmed by targeting calls over the years.
Then you see texas never get them, and you wonder if maybe there isn't something to the idea that they just flat get calls other schools don't. I tuned in at the start of the 3rd, and I've already seen them get three 15 yard calls their way.
Didn't a guy get in trouble on GameDay for basically saying, "Look at every team Bama has played this year. Their best defender gets ejected for targeting against Bama and/or the week before they play Bama in the second half."
I feel like the targeting rule (and with how loosely it was defined and upheld) was made to help certain teams and punish others.
It was a problem when widely called but there was no absolute black and white version of is that or is it not? Now we see targeting that can't be denied. It is targeting yet never even gets looked at. Oh yall are concussed from this collision? Let's not call or even look at it since that was why the rule was created. It's 2025... we shaped the game enough so bring back the brain injuries in college football
For my mental health, I am watching the ACC Champion struggle to beat or lose to the middle of the pack Big 12 team who beat tceh in the cereal bowl in El Paso.
Notice how Michigan had to challenge the spot and a review was never initiated by the booth.
Ginormus Ag said:Iraq2xVeteran said:
I hate how the referees in this game call questionable calls against Michigan but miss blatant calls, such as a targeting on a Michigan player.
First time watching a t-sip game?
No, it's not my first time. I have noticed how Texas has benefited from more favorable calls in the Texas games that I have watched.
Did some further research. Replay official is Bill Stimmel. Went to school at UT Arlington..
As long as Sark is making the calls, they should give him a flag to throw.
tigerag said:
Did some further research. Replay official is Bill Stimmel. Went to school at UT Arlington..
Interesting
Las Vegas Bowl
Texas A&M vs. USC
Allegiant Stadium Las Vegas | 10:30 p.m. ESPN ESPN+
Officials ACC
R Marcus Woods MDP
U Tom Laverty
H Baron Ballester MDP
L Jim Casey
F Tony Tarantini
S Michael Cullin
B Ken Bushey
C Joshua Fath
ALT Riley Johnson
RO Bill Stimmel
CO Steven Genzale
Matt Rhule continues his impressive run against ranked opponents.
EDIT - NU trails 38-14 to Utah late in the 3rd quarter.
EDIT - NU trails 38-14 to Utah late in the 3rd quarter.
If they give this to Texas I swear.
Theyre trying to announce this into being a fumble into the endzone now
FFS
The selective announcing attempting to use the "rules expert".
FFS
The selective announcing attempting to use the "rules expert".
That's a fumble
tigerag said:
Notice how Michigan had to challenge the spot and a review was never initiated by the booth.
So now ESPN hates Blue Blood Michigan?
That same Michigan that recently won the National Championship on ESPN in 2023. That same Michigan that produced ESPN darlings Tom Brady, Charles Woodson, Desmond Howrd, Bo Schembechler, Jim Harbaugh, Jalen Rose, Juwan Howrd, and Chris Webber?
I guess every scoring play is reviewed but that was pretty clear to me.
Michigan fixing to get boned on National TV
Matt Austin saying this should be a fumble out of the end zone
I think it crossed first
These announcers are the worst.
You can't overrule that. There's no evidence he wasn't already across the line. Which of course means Texas ball on the 20.
This is the worst rule in football, by the way.
Danny Vermin said:
That's a fumble
I think he had the ball at the line before fumble
You CANT overturn this indisputably
TXAGGIES said:
I think it crossed first
Of course it did.
But they're going to overturn it.
can you overturn a TD and call it a fumble when the fumble was no called on the field?
Featured Stories
See All
11:09
7h ago
2.6k
Youth movement helps No. 10 A&M hang 10 on Houston
by Richard Zane
7:33
14h ago
1.6k
Take Five: Jordan Lockhart's go-to spots, favorite movies & more
by Richard Zane
60:48
12h ago
2.3k
B-Team: Lone Star Showdown look back, answering baseball questions & more
by Ryan Brauninger
Average Joe
FINAL from Blue Bell Park: No. 10 Texas A&M 10, Houston 2
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
6
ReelAg6
FINAL from Blue Bell Park: No. 10 Texas A&M 10, Houston 2
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
6
Bullpen Chias
What do the numbers of baseballs in this icon represent
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
6
Bonnettecj1
What do the numbers of baseballs in this icon represent
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
3