BS calls
*****official Canes vs Lanes*****
35,110 Views |
720 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by CharleyKerfeld
Textbook targeting. Dude gave himself a concussion
There we go. Targeting is an illusion.
I resolve in 2026 to be more tolerant and respectful of trolls and emotionally fragile, overly pessimistic posters so they don’t run crying to the mods and have me banned for three days.
CJohns77 said:
Textbook targeting. Dude gave himself a concussion
And it isnt
Man - I don't think he even realized where Toney was - I think he was playing the ball.
EDIT: Kind of shocked they didn't call it.
EDIT: Kind of shocked they didn't call it.
Exactly what happened to Owens. Defender with arms wrapping up. Identical. Glad they didn't call it.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
I guess targeting isn't a thing anymore.
So can we strike targeting from the rule book?
What the hell is targeting now?
TAMUallen said:CJohns77 said:
Textbook targeting. Dude gave himself a concussion
And it isnt
Textbook baby
So that's for sure targeting " per the rules idiot, but not in our game?
Looked like the DB was going for the ball more than the hit
Looked like the DB was going for the ball more than the hit
He was playing the ball. Head was turned back to LOS
"Give me an army of West Point graduates and I'll win a battle. Give me a handful of Texas Aggies, and I'll win the war.”
- General George S. Patton
- General George S. Patton
the more coolest guy said:
There we go. Targeting is an illusion.
Targeting is whatever the narrative needs it to be.
Thank you...if you cant call it on the goal line at A&M or Georgia game dont call it here
Aggie_buster said:
What the hell is targeting now?
It is gone, unless it looks bad or is going to be used to throw games
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
Man - I don't think he even realized where Toney was - I think he was playing the ball.
EDIT: Kind of shocked they didn't call it.
That's what I thought too. He wasn't even looking at the WR and going towards the ball
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
Just get rid of the targetting rule. It's a joke. It seems in big games the rule changes so they reject players in major games.
Textbook targetting. If the goal is player safety and both players go out bc the hit to the head then you actually don't care about player safety.
Textbook targetting. If the goal is player safety and both players go out bc the hit to the head then you actually don't care about player safety.
oneeyedag said:
Thank you...if you cant call it on the goal line at A&M or Georgia game dont call it here
Well they didn't so texags should be done talking the Owen play right?
If a rule designed to protect players from getting head injuries doesn't get triggered when both players are concussed then the rule is garbage.
"Rules Idiot"
Made me laugh…….
Made me laugh…….
Apparently whatever the PTB need it to be.
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
That's complete BS. A defenseless player does not require a launch. By rule it doesn't even have to be helmet to helmet. A hit to the head with the forearm even to a defenseless player is targeting by rule.
Forceable contact to the head or neck of a defenseless player. It should have been called.
I think the ref made an executive decision to not give Miami extra yards on a non intentional penalty. Dude clearly isn't getting back in the game.
I think the ref made an executive decision to not give Miami extra yards on a non intentional penalty. Dude clearly isn't getting back in the game.
Gyles Marrett said:JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
That's complete BS. A defenseless player does not require a launch. By rule it doesn't even have to be helmet to helmet. A hit to the head with the forearm even to a defenseless player is targeting by rule.
Both players are going for the ball, incidental contact. Clear as mud.
Not a Beck fan but Reed could learn a ton from watching him throw check down after check down after check down. The ball on the outside is such a good safe play when nothing is available in front of you. Reed missed so many of these in the playoff game
Terrible playcall
DGrimesAg92 said:Gyles Marrett said:JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
That's complete BS. A defenseless player does not require a launch. By rule it doesn't even have to be helmet to helmet. A hit to the head with the forearm even to a defenseless player is targeting by rule.
Both players are going for the ball, incidental contact. Clear as mud.
You obviously don't know the rule. Intent has no part of the rule when the receiver is defenseless. Intent is completely meaningless.
they called it against a A&M safety at Nebraska one year and he was clearly going for the pick and collided with the WR like we just saw. But it was upheld against A&M.JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
Can't remember the safety name.
Gyles Marrett said:JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
That's complete BS. A defenseless player does not require a launch. By rule it doesn't even have to be helmet to helmet. A hit to the head with the forearm even to a defenseless player is targeting by rule.
This is correct.
Watch the damn ball.
92Ag95 said:
I've got a feeling Ole Miss is gonna roll Miami tonight.
Could have just been a liitle gas.
If the hit by the Florida defender to our TE's butt two years ago is targetting and this hit isn't then the rule is completely pointlesss.
Gyles Marrett said:DGrimesAg92 said:Gyles Marrett said:JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
I don't think it was textbook at all.
Textbook is launching at a guy - this kid didn't see Toney at all - his hands and eyes were on the ball the whole time and they just collided. He never even lowered his head.
That's complete BS. A defenseless player does not require a launch. By rule it doesn't even have to be helmet to helmet. A hit to the head with the forearm even to a defenseless player is targeting by rule.
Both players are going for the ball, incidental contact. Clear as mud.
You obviously don't know the rule. Intent has no part of the rule when the receiver is defenseless. Intent is completely meaningless.
I bet you're a hoot at a comedy show. Do you ask the comedian questions during the show? "Clear as mud?". SMH........
He Who Shall Be Unnamed said:JPK89 said:
Thought I hated OM but find myself rooting for them sans Kiffin.
Would be glorious for them to win natty with Kiffin sitting in Baton Rouge.
I've also been trying to figure out which outcome would be worse for Lane Kiffin. Talk about a moral dilemma!
Kiffin gets $750,000 if OM wins. I have to hope for the Canes on this premise alone.
Hopefully with the way things are going, Kiffin gets himself banned from CFB like Harbaugh. LSU gets screwed horribly in the process.
Featured Stories
See All
Texas A&M adds Illinois DT Angelo McCullom via transfer portal
by Ryan Brauninger
17:40
20h ago
8.5k
LIVE from Reed Arena: Texas A&M vs. No. 7 Vanderbilt
by Kay Naegeli
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 83, Oklahoma 76
by Luke Evangelist