It was reviewable.

I'm going from memory here, but in the CL VAR is supposed to help with cardable offenses (like VC), fouls in the penalty box, and goals (including offside and fouls on the build-up to a goal).

Look guys... said:

---

jeffk said:

---

That's right. There's not really much VAR can do about a quick whistle... once the play is blown dead on the field, all the hypothetical results are out the window. That's why refs and ARs are so slow with a lot of calls... if they get a no-call wrong, VAR will step in and "save" them.

---

After the whistle was blown, VAR should've been used to issue a foul on the keeper and DOGSO.

---

But there was no DOGSO. Ederson didn't deny the obvious goal. The Referee did by calling the foul the wrong direction. Thats why VAR didnt get involved in the play. The only way VAR could have fixed this is if he blew it dead for a foul against Dortmund in the penalty area. Then VAR can say to go look you missed a penalty and he sees the foul on Ederson. Then the wrong gets righted by wiping the card out and by giving the PK to equalize the goal he took away. But its still a just a foul as the ref blew it dead. I don't see any it gets called DOGSO. As Jeff says, no whistle for the wrong foul and its advantage, a goal and that its.

Look at the law I just copied....

but...here is what a fifa referee says:

Quote:

---

Those of you who are arguing that keeper kicked attacker.
When two players play the ball, it is expected that BOTH play it in a fair manner.
In this case, keeper kicked and then tried again to kick the ball in a normal manner (side of foot). Attacker came in with exposed cleats. Keeper was not careless in their approach. Attacker WAS careless in their approach. Even though attacker played ball, the contact (careless approach) was on them, NOT the keeper.

---

Dude is hardly ever wrong, so I'm good.

No, I don't think that's right. Because he called a foul on the Dortmund player outside the box, the DOGSO never existed and VAR couldn't intervene to correct that call.

It's all moo now as I no longer beleive it was a foul on the keeper.

jeffk said:

---

No, I don't think that's right. Because he called a foul on the Dortmund player outside the box, the DOGSO never existed and VAR couldn't intervene to correct that call.

---

The clear and obvious error could be not calling a foul on the keeper but on the attacker. If that's a foul, that's DOGSO.

It's all semantics at this point.

If you have VAR, use it.

Ok. Glad we had this discussion.

Soooooo Who are we watching?

PSG and BM might be a better match....

and I doubt Pulisic starts....

jeffk said:

---

Ok. Glad we had this discussion.

---

I'm fully ok to admit I was wrong.

The only Dogso was on the ref.

Look guys... said:

---

Soooooo Who are we watching?

PSG and BM might be a better match....

and I doubt Pulisic starts....

---

Well hell...it's snowing in Munich.

Look guys... said:

---

If that's a foul, that's DOGSO.

---

No it's not. I'll say again. Ederson didn't stop the goal scoring opportunity. You can't card him for something he didn't do.

Mathguy64 said:

---

Look guys... said:

---

If that's a foul, that's DOGSO.

---

No it's not. I'll say again. Ederson didn't stop the goal scoring opportunity. You can't card him for something he didn't do.

---

yeah, you're right.

When Americans says we need technical ability over athleticism, I look at Mbappe and say, why not both?

1-0 PSG
Mbappe 3'

Scoretzka just had a great chance. Bayern has dominated since. 66% possession and had 5 shots on in goal in 20'. And already 10 plus attempts.

Snowing too. Listening on the radio is tough.

Legal Custodian said:

---

1-0 PSG
Mbappe 3'

Scoretzka just had a great chance. Bayern has dominated since. 66% possession and had 5 shots on in goal in 20'. And already 10 plus attempts.

Snowing too. Listening on the radio is tough.

---

Paramount isn't that much.

And week free.

BM is really missing Levandowski.

This german blizzard is fantastic

****! Another goal for PSG.

Bayern is dominating play except for putting the ball in the net.

Legal Custodian said:

---

****! Another goal for PSG.

Bayern is dominating play except for putting the ball in the net.

---

It's over in the first 30 minutes. Those 2 away goals are going to be tough to beat.

Neymer dribbles in the box. Both his feet stop working and he falls down.

Like, if there ever is a card for simulation, that's it.

This could get interesting now that Bayern's pulled one back. They're definitely getting enough looks to put another one in.

fig96 said:

---

This could get interesting now that Bayern's pulled one back. They're definitely getting enough looks to put another one in.

---

I think it'll end 2-2 today.

Goes 2-2 in PSG and they decide it eventually in KFTM.

Chelsea leading at the half 1-0. Mason Mount's goal was definitely against the run of play.

Someone post if Puli is subbed on.

Will do. I expect him to play. Chelsea's front 3 have been MIA.

They have 64% possession but only 1 shot... which was a goal but still not a great display so far.

I swear to God all Carragher and Micah Richards is laugh at each other dumb jokes. Its unwatchable.

Kate is hot though, so there's that.

It's a crime that Bayern aren't winning this handily. The stats are incredibly lopsided and the play on the field matches them.

deadbq03 said:

---

It's a crime that Bayern aren't winning this handily. The stats are incredibly lopsided and the play on the field matches them.

---

And 2-2 now

That was pretty, Bayern equalizes 2-2 in 60'.

Pulisic subs on in the 65'

Mbappe with another one. Bayern needs to win this one somehow with the three away goals to overcome in the 2nd leg. Not looking good.

KCup17 said:

---

Pulisic subs on in the 65'

---

Misses the upper 90 by inches as it hit the upright and crossbar at the same time.

I hate Neymar so much. Didn't really do anything this match, just hate him in general.

PSG win 3-2. Will be incredibly hard to overcome next week in Paris.