Pahdz said:aggiephoenix02 said:
Damn, those fans look cold. I guess they're used to that type of weather though…
No such thing as bad weather just bad gear
You didn't go to the '97 t.u. game. No gear would have made that weather not miserable.
Pahdz said:aggiephoenix02 said:
Damn, those fans look cold. I guess they're used to that type of weather though…
No such thing as bad weather just bad gear
Ive been thinking about that game seeing some tweets about the coldest game people have ever been to.ChipFTAC01 said:Pahdz said:aggiephoenix02 said:
Damn, those fans look cold. I guess they're used to that type of weather though…
No such thing as bad weather just bad gear
You didn't go to the '97 t.u. game. No gear would have made that weather not miserable.
We gained fans in Minnesota.Out in Left Field said:
Apart from the two wins, not a good look for US soccer in this window. Loss to Canada and playing in absurd conditions vs Honduras. Wins are good, but I wouldn't say we've gained any fans
The American public is so fickle. Once we start winning in the WC, we'll gain fans for a few weeks. Then in 26 when we make the finals, everyone will say they're the biggest USMNT team fan in the world.Out in Left Field said:
Apart from the two wins, not a good look for US soccer in this window. Loss to Canada and playing in absurd conditions vs Honduras. Wins are good, but I wouldn't say we've gained any fans
We won the 2 games we were supposed to and made good use of home field advantage. Every away game we play in CONCACAF is played in absurd conditions when you account for the state of some of the fields and venues we travel to and that's before you even get into the fan behavior at some of those places. We weren't going to make any "new" fans from playing in better conditions this window and certainly not if we had dropped points to the central american teams at home.Out in Left Field said:
Apart from the two wins, not a good look for US soccer in this window. Loss to Canada and playing in absurd conditions vs Honduras. Wins are good, but I wouldn't say we've gained any fans
Agree 100%Thunder18 said:We won the 2 games we were supposed to and made good use of home field advantage. Every away game we play in CONCACAF is played in absurd conditions when you account for the state of some of the fields and venues we travel to and that's before you even get into the fan behavior at some of those places. We weren't going to make any "new" fans from playing in better conditions this window and certainly not if we had dropped points to the central american teams at home.Out in Left Field said:
Apart from the two wins, not a good look for US soccer in this window. Loss to Canada and playing in absurd conditions vs Honduras. Wins are good, but I wouldn't say we've gained any fans
I think if you look at seasonal averages in locations, USSF did not get that unlucky with the temps. There were many places that were much more likely to have better playing conditions.tysker said:
Am I the only one that didn't mind the Minnesota location and thinks USSF just got unlucky with the temps? Playing in Frisco last night would probably have been just as ugly
Think Morris was drifting into spots where Robinson wants to be.Marvin said:
Not sure what Robinson was doing dribbling into traffic so much.
He's definitely playing very well. There are still some big parts of his game to improve, specifically in the passing, but he has made such large developments in other parts you dont want to nitpick.oh no said:
is it wrong to suggest that Weston McKennie is turning out to be a world class player and could reach heights near the top of the world? I love the fight, the dog in him, the work rate, the leadership, technical class, the tactical decision-making, the long-throw specialist duties, the prowess in the air despite his height, and he's just flat out producing for club and country.
My point was that players could rise up to supplant him, and that would be a good thing. LOLAye Davanita said:
Lol. As long as he doesn't do dumb stuff and stays healthy, he's a lock.
I wouldn't say that at all. Those are extra set-piece or corner service into the box. I don't think he had any on Wednesday, but I think all 3 or so of them on Sunday were service into the box and connected with someone. Obviously didn't score on those, but those are extra chances you otherwise have to create after a short throw.tysker said:
And can we say that Weston's long throws too often are inconsequential to the point of being wasteful?
But when the defense knows its coming, they can easily prepare and markup. He's not throwing it to Zimmerman or himself, both of which are great in the air. And then Weston winds up 40 yards away from a potential counterattack which requires your DM to hedge backwards and remove themselves from the offenseoh no said:I wouldn't say that at all. Those are extra set-piece or corner service into the box. I don't think he had any on Wednesday, but I think all 3 or so of them on Sunday were service into the box and connected with someone. Obviously didn't score on those, but those are extra chances you otherwise have to create after a short throw.tysker said:
And can we say that Weston's long throws too often are inconsequential to the point of being wasteful?
Which is not really any different than a corner or free kick set piece out wide, other than the person doing it. Every player on the pitch knows how to use their heads and of course the other team will mark up, but you're giving your team a chance to win it and make something happen.tysker said:But when the defense knows its coming, they can easily prepare and markup. He's not throwing it to Zimmerman or himself, both of which are great in the air. And then Weston winds up 40 yards away from a potential counterattack which requires your DM to hedge backwards and remove themselves from the offenseoh no said:I wouldn't say that at all. Those are extra set-piece or corner service into the box. I don't think he had any on Wednesday, but I think all 3 or so of them on Sunday were service into the box and connected with someone. Obviously didn't score on those, but those are extra chances you otherwise have to create after a short throw.tysker said:
And can we say that Weston's long throws too often are inconsequential to the point of being wasteful?
But Weston doesnt take corners of free kicks out wide. Weston is one of our best target men and better tacklers. Why take him away from where the ball is going to be?oh no said:Which is not really any different than a corner or free kick set piece out wide, other than the person doing it. Every player on the pitch knows how to use their heads and of course the other team will mark up, but you're giving your team a chance to win it and make something happen.tysker said:But when the defense knows its coming, they can easily prepare and markup. He's not throwing it to Zimmerman or himself, both of which are great in the air. And then Weston winds up 40 yards away from a potential counterattack which requires your DM to hedge backwards and remove themselves from the offenseoh no said:I wouldn't say that at all. Those are extra set-piece or corner service into the box. I don't think he had any on Wednesday, but I think all 3 or so of them on Sunday were service into the box and connected with someone. Obviously didn't score on those, but those are extra chances you otherwise have to create after a short throw.tysker said:
And can we say that Weston's long throws too often are inconsequential to the point of being wasteful?
PatAg said:My point was that players could rise up to supplant him, and that would be a good thing. LOLAye Davanita said:
Lol. As long as he doesn't do dumb stuff and stays healthy, he's a lock.
I was talking about a lock for the starting lineup, but I guess I never really specified that.Aye Davanita said:PatAg said:My point was that players could rise up to supplant him, and that would be a good thing. LOLAye Davanita said:
Lol. As long as he doesn't do dumb stuff and stays healthy, he's a lock.
Yes it would be. But McKennie would need 4-5 guys to surpass him before he's not on the squad.
It's all good. Everyone should earn their spot every camp and every game.PatAg said:I was talking about a lock for the starting lineup, but I guess I never really specified that.Aye Davanita said:PatAg said:My point was that players could rise up to supplant him, and that would be a good thing. LOLAye Davanita said:
Lol. As long as he doesn't do dumb stuff and stays healthy, he's a lock.
Yes it would be. But McKennie would need 4-5 guys to surpass him before he's not on the squad.
EIther way, McKennie has been playing great, I just hope he knows he still has that big hole in his game and keeps pushing himself. They're all still so young, a lot can happen
Its not unlucky, it was an intentional move. There is no comparison between average winter temps in Minnesota vs Frisco, Austin, Miami, etc.tysker said:
Am I the only one that didn't mind the Minnesota location and thinks USSF just got unlucky with the temps? Playing in Frisco last night would probably have been just as ugly