* WC Group D thread (France, Australia, Denmark, Tunisia) *

11,872 Views | 211 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Mathguy64
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Going to be a crazy final 20-25 minutes
Gig ‘Em Baby!
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Denmark is going with the flop strategy and it's not working.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

for those wondering;

France
  • Win or draw vs. TUN: FRA clinch 1st place
  • Lose vs. TUN: FRA still clinch 1st place if AUS lose or draw. If AUS win, tiebreakers will be needed.
Australia
  • Win vs. DEN: AUS qualify as runner-up or potentially 1st place if FRA lose and AUS win tiebreakers.
  • Draw vs. DEN: AUS qualify as runner-up if TUN lose or draw. If TUN win tiebreakers are needed.
  • Lose vs. DEN: AUS are eliminated.
Denmark
  • Win vs. AUS: DEN qualify as group runner-up.
  • Draw or lose vs. AUS: DEN eliminated.
Tunisia
  • Win vs. FRA: TUN can potentially qualify as runner-up on tiebreakers only if AUS draw or lose. If AUS win, TUN are eliminated.
  • Draw or lose vs. FRA: TUN eliminated.

here again to keep it on this page. Tunisia needs to hold on and hope for a Danish equalizer.
La Bamba
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
France bringing on Dembele and Griezmann. They don't wanna lose this thing.
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
La Bamba said:

France bringing on Dembele and Griezmann. They don't wanna lose this thing.
Well, they don't want to lose to their fellow compatriots.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Australia is through if they hold. Tunisia is through If Danes equalize. Danes are through if they score twice lol
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Schmikel in the box for a set piece
Out in Left Field
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
'Roos hold on
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aussie are in
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Consolation / pride win on the line for Tunisia in the last minute now
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And groesmann scores
GrapevineAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And Griezmann equalizes
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Griezmann puts one in right at 90+8
Out in Left Field
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They looking at foul or offside?
La Bamba
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tunisia wins but doesn't matter.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not a big fan of the TUN bench huddled up watching the other game... I get that the result matters but your team is playing right now.
young eugene
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How was Griezmann offside? Wasnt he played onside by the header there?
Out in Left Field
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How was that off? The defender deliberately plays the ball
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm wearing my Australia jersey for the rest of the day now. What a performance and rebound from that France thumping.
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dre_00 said:

Denmark and France


Ahem
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KCup17 said:

I'm wearing my Australia jersey for the rest of the day now. What a performance and rebound from that France thumping.
It is very impressive. They out worked France at the start of their match and with the early goal where really high on themselves; very gutsy to suck all their air back in and rebound the next two matches.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have no clue why that's a not a goal.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Out in Left Field said:

How was that off? The defender deliberately plays the ball
Apparently they're considering it a deflection.

ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Griezmann
I know it's entirely wrong but this is the only thing I can ever think of when I read his name:

Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That goal was disallowed based on a new interpretation/clarification that came out a couple of months ago. The defender didnt play the ball and control it. I he headed it but hes not heading it under control so its considered a form of a deflection and it went to a player in an offside position last having been played by his teammate.

3 months ago this was a good goal. Now, its not.
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which is more difficult to decide, a catch in college football / NFL or offside + handball in soccer?
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

That goal was disallowed based on a new interpretation/clarification that came out a couple of months ago. The defender didnt play the ball and control it. I he headed it but hes not heading it under control so its considered a form of a deflection and it went to a player in an offside position last having been played by his teammate.

3 months ago this was a good goal. Now, its not.
I'm seeing that on the referee forum, but can't find it in my lotg app. Where is that?
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was a memo sent out with something like 15 video clips giving examples. Its on the IFAB website.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

It was a memo sent out with something like 15 video clips giving examples. Its on the FIFA website.
Those should go to the ap.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chuck Cunningham said:

Mathguy64 said:

It was a memo sent out with something like 15 video clips giving examples. Its on the FIFA website.
Those should go to the ap.
It went to everyone that mattered and its not a change in the LOTG. That app is strictly the LOTG.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Chuck Cunningham said:

Mathguy64 said:

It was a memo sent out with something like 15 video clips giving examples. Its on the FIFA website.
Those should go to the ap.
It went to everyone that mattered and its not a change in the LOTG. That app is strictly the LOTG.


Well when they're changing the definition of a word that is in the laws of the game, that's important to have. So when I'm leaning I can look at the laws of the game and interpret it.

Oh well. Sucks being someone that doesn't matter.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
**** Argentina immediately score to start the 2nd
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Go take a class to be a referee. That's who the information was given to. Im being 100% serious. Reading Law 11 on an app doesn't tell you how to adjudicate offsides. We teach people how to do that by having them AR games and giving them situations to reinforce what is or isn't offside.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Go take a class to be a referee. That's who the information was given to. Im being 100% serious. Reading Law 11 on an app doesn't tell you how to adjudicate offsides. We teach people how to do that by having them AR games and giving them situations to reinforce what is or isn't offside.


Especially if they withhold information. Once my daughter stops playing that's the plan.
nereus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The people that really need to take referee classes the most are the announcers. I didn't see that game (so maybe that was mentioned in the broadcast but by the posts here it doesn't seem like it probably was or at least wasn't explained well). The announcers should be able to point out that there was a pretty big rule change a couple month ago that changed how the rule is applied in these situations. General fans shouldn't have to be going to referee classes, websites or even TexAgs to learn there was a pretty major change to the rules interpretation that happened in the last few months. The broadcast should be able to cover that sufficiently.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.