can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not...or maybe I shouldn't have used the comma. He meant beat the possibility of a foul by dunking fast. but he said "should have dunked AND 1!--with no foul"
doesn't make sense. no foul would not be an and 1.
[This message has been edited by J Peterman (edited 5/11/2011 8:31p).]