Screwing guys over on service time is one way we have earned their animosity in the past when it has come to trying to get them to sign extensions or new contracts instead of becoming free agents. Perhaps Dana is trying to turn over a new leaf on that strategy.AggiEE said:linkdude said:some wet-blanketry that's been earned by the franchise over the years. If it helps the team this year though, I'm guessing most would say it's worth it. He won't be any easier to sign to an extension than most potential stars.Shifting away from stealing an extra year of club control is bad business, especially when you're a team that refuses to extend your own guys, but it's great news for the Dodgers, Mets, Yankees, and other big spenders. They'll get their shot at Cam Smith a year earlier now https://t.co/h2al1SCIZ0
— Adam Spolane (@AdamSpolane) March 25, 2025
Personally though it seems like inversely it could make an extension more palatable since the team would be putting him out there and not screwing around with his service time.
"A rookie who starts on the roster and spends at least 172 days on the major league roster or injured list during a typical 187-day season, accrues a full year of service time"
My understanding is that Cam Smith can still be sent down and would not gain a year of service time. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
Cam Smith, if he finishes in the top two ROY candidate slots, would automatically get a full year of service time regardless of how long he's played. It's also possible we get a draft pick if he wins.
Seems to be very little downside, imho. If a stud player earns his right to be on the roster, don't hold him back, you're only hurting your chances for 2025.
