***Official Houston Astros 2025-26 Offseason Thread***

554,133 Views | 7195 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by tjack16
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL.

Assault has consequences
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agproducer said:

I think higher.

Fangraphs -- imo -- is vastly underrating the amount of injuries we had last year and applying it to this year.

I think it will be a two-way race with Seattle for the division. Has Seattle truly gotten better? They resigned Naylor. They lost Suarez and Polanco. They are at this point according to the depth chart -- starting Cole Young at 2B and Ben Williamson at 3B. Both haven't seen much action at the MLB level.

Their pitching is relatively the same.
what they do have over us is trade assets with respect to prospects, thus their ability to get Donovan. Seems like it's Boston or bust when it comes to preseason trades, so we'll see if anything materializes.
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
linkdude said:

agproducer said:

I think higher.

Fangraphs -- imo -- is vastly underrating the amount of injuries we had last year and applying it to this year.

I think it will be a two-way race with Seattle for the division. Has Seattle truly gotten better? They resigned Naylor. They lost Suarez and Polanco. They are at this point according to the depth chart -- starting Cole Young at 2B and Ben Williamson at 3B. Both haven't seen much action at the MLB level.

Their pitching is relatively the same.

what they do have over us is trade assets with respect to prospects, thus their ability to get Donovan. Seems like it's Boston or bust when it comes to preseason trades, so we'll see if anything materializes.

I think it is silly to think that a team of aging stars will get better and less injury prone because they are all a year older. We have really done nothing to make our offense better this offseason (unless you count the coaching changes /s) and our major rivals have gone out and made significant signings and trades to improve their weaknesses. Most of our reasons to think we will be better start with "If..." and hope is not usually a solid winning strategy. I hope to eat these words at the end of the season, but I don't see us winning more than 85 games unless something significant happens in the trade market in the next few weeks.
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The last team I wanted to see where Donovan landed was Seattle. If it happens thats a heck of an offense they will have. I just hope our pitching is good enough to overtake the division, along with minimal injuries.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seattle trading for Donovan would suck.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Seattle trading for Donovan would suck.

Would? It happened.
agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes -- they are a year older -- BUT --

Do we expect Yordan to miss another 100 games?
Pena -- 30+?
Meyers -- 50+?
Paredes -- 55?
And a plethora of pitchers going out with TJ?


agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This team -- as constructed -- should be in the thick of it at the ASB. Then, you re-evaluate your needs and make a push.

We had an historic number of injuries last year. Historic -- and we were still in it. That says a lot about the team's moxie.

I don't think this is a 100 win team, but I could see high-end 93 or 94 -- *if* pitching holds up and we remain relatively healthy.

Also -- I don't buy Seattle at all. I think they rode their pitching last year, got an epic year from Dumper. I don't think Cal hits 60 again this year. I believe it was a complete anomaly.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the Astros cannot afford Yordan to miss more than 22 games

need at least 140 from Yordan
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
by the way...Yordan has only surpassed 140 games played twice in his career

2021 & 2024
agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

by the way...Yordan has only surpassed 140 games played twice in his career

2021 & 2024

I would be happy with 120 -- compared to the 60ish we got from him last year where he wasn't healthy.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
here's Seattle advantage over the Astros:

2025 games played leaders for the Mariners:

160 - JRod
160 - Arozarena
159 - Raleigh
157 - Crawford

Seattle has a different philosophy about resting players

(or a different clubhouse mentality regarding 162)
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Well ****


Looks like both the Sox and Astros are being pushed to a trade of necessity.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agproducer said:

Yes -- they are a year older -- BUT --

Do we expect Yordan to miss another 100 games?
Pena -- 30+?
Meyers -- 50+?
Paredes -- 55?
And a plethora of pitchers going out with TJ?




Consider me Missouri when it comes to this Astros team. Show me. I will be super happy if I am wrong, but for now, I just don't feel like this is a better team than last year. Our best month last season was when we were playing a bunch of AAAA guys, not when we had all the guys who will be the starters this season.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agproducer said:

This team -- as constructed -- should be in the thick of it at the ASB. Then, you re-evaluate your needs and make a push.

We had an historic number of injuries last year. Historic -- and we were still in it. That says a lot about the team's moxie.

I don't think this is a 100 win team, but I could see high-end 93 or 94 -- *if* pitching holds up and we remain relatively healthy.

Also -- I don't buy Seattle at all. I think they rode their pitching last year, got an epic year from Dumper. I don't think Cal hits 60 again this year. I believe it was a complete anomaly.

Seattle will probably be better even if Cal's numbers decline. With a full year of Naylor and the addition of Donovan their offense is pretty stout.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
W said:

here's Seattle advantage over the Astros:

2025 games played leaders for the Mariners:

160 - JRod
160 - Arozarena
159 - Raleigh
157 - Crawford

Seattle has a different philosophy about resting players

(or a different clubhouse mentality regarding 162)


It would seem their philosophy would be not having their best players get injured. Pretty novel philosophy.



If you care to interact, Jose Altuve played in 153 and 155 games in 2024 and 2025 respectively.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BCEDAg said:

agproducer said:

This team -- as constructed -- should be in the thick of it at the ASB. Then, you re-evaluate your needs and make a push.

We had an historic number of injuries last year. Historic -- and we were still in it. That says a lot about the team's moxie.

I don't think this is a 100 win team, but I could see high-end 93 or 94 -- *if* pitching holds up and we remain relatively healthy.

Also -- I don't buy Seattle at all. I think they rode their pitching last year, got an epic year from Dumper. I don't think Cal hits 60 again this year. I believe it was a complete anomaly.

Seattle will probably be better even if Cal's numbers decline. With a full year of Naylor and the addition of Donovan their offense is pretty stout.


But they did lose a career year from Polanco.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think we will look at the Mariners year last year as one similar to the Rangers in 2023. Many guys had career or near-career years, especially in HRs.
Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean.... whatever it takes
Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EastCoastAgNc said:


Cards got a ton in that deal. No way we could have matched it.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

EastCoastAgNc said:



Cards got a ton in that deal. No way we could have matched it.

Now we understand why ketch kept saying the price was too rich for us.
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seattle seems like they've given up a ton of prospects recently, are they at risk of depleting their farm system?
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are probably closer to average in farm system rankings now so I'd say yes they are measurably weaker but still significantly ahead of us.
3rd Coast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They have 6 top 100 prospects. Seven prior to the trade.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bingo.

There's a narrative that the Astros just "aren't doing anything". That's not true. They just don't have the assets that it takes to get deals like this done.

Prospects like Ullola, Matthews, etc all have very high ceilings and can turn out to be good players but their floors are significantly lower than most of the prospects you see moved or listed on top 100 lists. They have elite tools but the path to success in the big leagues is quite narrow. A lot has to go right and click.

Sure, that can be said about any prospect but it's especially true for most of the guys in the Astros system.

The loss of draft picks due to the sign stealing scandal was a significant penalty.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

Farmer1906 said:

Well ****



Looks like both the Sox and Astros are being pushed to a trade of necessity.

The two teams are communicating nearly every day but nothing seems close. That can change fast though. Boston values both Abreu and Duran a lot and the price tag is way higher than the Astros are willing to pay.

I think the odds are 50/50 if you were to ask me today if Paredes will be on the opening day roster. Both sides are motivated to get something done.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015 said:

Bingo.

There's a narrative that the Astros just "aren't doing anything". That's not true. They just don't have the assets that it takes to get deals like this done.

Prospects like Ullola, Matthews, etc all have very high ceilings and can turn out to be good players but their floors are significantly lower than most of the prospects you see moved or listed on top 100 lists. They have elite tools but the path to success in the big leagues is quite narrow. A lot has to go right and click.

Sure, that can be said about any prospect but it's especially true for most of the guys in the Astros system.

The loss of draft picks due to the sign stealing scandal was a significant penalty.

I think it's also the fact the Astros lost the top 2 draft picks in the covid draft where they only had 5 rounds. That means they lost 40% of the draft in 2020. It was a double-whammy. The Astros also are usually picking later in the draft, and when they do pick, they haven't done the greatest job of drafting since then.
SECcess12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Feels like we are just hanging on by a thread with this team. If this year doesn't go well, time to start over. Think we should have gone down that path 2 years ago, but that's just me.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, if no more changes to the roster, what are we looking at on opening day?

1. Pena SS
2. Paredes DH
3. Yordan LF
4. Correa 3B
5. Walker 1B
6. Altuve 2B
7. Diaz C
8. Cam RF
9. Meyers CF

One lefty bat, again.....
superaggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

So, if no more changes to the roster, what are we looking at on opening day?

1. Pena SS
2. Paredes DH
3. Yordan LF
4. Correa 3B
5. Walker 1B
6. Altuve 2B
7. Diaz C
8. Cam RF
9. Meyers CF

One lefty bat, again.....



I think…if no more roster changes…Cole and Sanchez will platoon with Meyers and Cam for R/L matchups.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can't imagine Joe outwardly saying they don't want Yordan to play much LF this year only to start him in LF on Opening Day.

Yet here we are starting Yordan in LF.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015 said:

Bingo.

There's a narrative that the Astros just "aren't doing anything". That's not true. They just don't have the assets that it takes to get deals like this done.

Prospects like Ullola, Matthews, etc all have very high ceilings and can turn out to be good players but their floors are significantly lower than most of the prospects you see moved or listed on top 100 lists. They have elite tools but the path to success in the big leagues is quite narrow. A lot has to go right and click.

Sure, that can be said about any prospect but it's especially true for most of the guys in the Astros system.

The loss of draft picks due to the sign stealing scandal was a significant penalty.

That and the fact that we sign players with QO, we got above the luxury tax, and we make trades to bring in MLB talent regularly. Crane has run this team like he wants to win at the major league level. We've been able to sustain it with player development, extensions, spending in free agency, and adding in trades.

Compare us to everyone over the last decade. There have been 3 teams that have won at an extremely consistent rate. Us, the Dodgers, and the Yankees. The Yankees have largely failed in October and outspent us by a large margin. The Dodgers are a different animal with their near-unlimited resources. The Red Sox, Braves, Cardinals, Cubs, Rays, Guardians, Mets, etc., have all had lulls, rebuilds, or never came close to reaching our peaks.

All that to say, we shouldn't have the farm system to add great players with years of control. That is why trading from the major league level makes some sense if it 1. helps with roster construction and 2. extends the window.
First Page Last Page
Page 182 of 206
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.