***Official Houston Astros 2025-26 Offseason Thread***

790,316 Views | 8670 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Moe Jzyslak
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40 said:

txags92 said:

Beat40 said:

txags92 said:

agproducer said:

Farmer1906 said:

TarponChaser said:

Farmer1906 said:

TarponChaser said:

I don't know what we could get but even if we have to eat a chunk of his salary, I think we need to try to trade Walker before Paredes. Try to get prospects and OF guys and put Paredes at first.

Based on reports, there is little to no interest in Walker. Add in his partial no-team trade clause and it's clear where he's still on the team.

If we can't find someone to take Walker and don't/can't trade Correa & Altuve, then it leaves Paredes as the odd man out, unless you bench one of Walker, Correa, or Altuve.

It comes down to needing an injury or being okay with Walker and his $40 M dollars owed being a part-time player.

OR you gotta trade Paredes since he has value and the team has other needs (OF help).


That sucks.

I think Paredes has all-star potential at 1st. Walker seems to have just gotten old and lost bat speed.

His slowed down bat speed (0.9 lower) is still fairly elite. He was sandwiched between Wilyer Abreu and Bryce Harper. He's still 150+ spots and about 5 MPH ahead of Paredes.

I think Walker could bounce back. I'm still of the thought that being with a new team last year, he rushed back from injury. I think the true CW is what we got in the second half of last year. He started turning it around a bit in June.



Also -- stats show he may have just been trying too hard. His First pitch swing % went up almost 13% YoY. His swing % and out of the zome swing % were also up. Trying to live up to the big contract?



I am more concerned about his home splits. His first half was ok, but his 2nd half was atrocious once teams learned he couldn't catch up to a fastball anymore.

Home March-June 2025: .240/.312/.416 with .728 OPS, 29.5% K rate, and wRC+ 104
Home July-October 2025: .146/.231/.233 with .464 OPS, 36.8% K rate, and wRC+ 30


So they didn't figure out he couldn't catch up to the fastball when he was away?

He has the same issue home or away, yet his OPS was 139pts higher in the second half (.799). For the year his away OPS was 171 pts higher.

So how are you explaining it?

Here's a question for you that I would like a sincere answer: His second half OPS was .799. If he could have an OPS of .800 the entire year, but keep similar home/away splits, do you take it?

Honestly, I think we should have made a bigger effort to trade him to one of the teams whose stadium he hit lights out in, but yeah it is a no brainer if he has an .800 OPS overall, I want that on the field. But if it is 1.000 on the road and .600 at home, he is not going to be an every day player for me in home games if we have Paredes sitting on the bench collecting dust. Keep in mind that we are not talking small sample sizes...he hit right around .200 for the season at home. 82 games is not cherrypicking.

When should we have made the effort to trade him? During the season or after? How were we going to do that when it's clear those teams don't want him?

I haven't said you're cherry picking. However, 82 games compared to his previous 6 or 7 years is a small sample.

My point is it's pretty darn unexplainable why that happened last year. Sometimes the answer is "it's just baseball."

We're just coming from two different sides. You take it as you're not playing him at home. I'm taking it as he's earned the right have some time to start his year at home because of what he did on the road. I've gotta know which player he is now. Is he the 1st half hitter or the 2nd half hitter? I can't answer that question.

Which do you think he is?

After the season, obviously. We were not swimming with spare anything during the season and he was one of the few that stayed marginally healthy. I am not saying we bench him at home to start the season. Since we couldn't trade him in the offseason, we have to find out what he is and isn't capable of. Maybe he just doesn't see the ball well at Daikin. Maybe he was trying too hard to live up to his contract. Maybe Cintron and Snitker ruined him (j/k). Maybe he was tired from dealing with a newborn. I don't know the cause.

But what I know is that for what he is making, he needs to figure it out. For me he starts the year as a fulltime starter, but I am not giving him the full season to get it together. But if he makes it a couple of months into the season and his home #s look like 2025, I start limiting his home starts and find other lineups that give us a better chance to win there.

I really honestly do like Christian Walker and want him to put up good numbers like he has previously in his career, but it is hard to shake the stink of the last big 1B FA contract and how that ended and not feel like maybe we are just jinxed bringing in older stars at the position. Most of all, I just really hate starting the season with a bunch of "if" statements as our reason we think the season will be successful. If Walker hits like we know he can and finds a pulse at Daikin...if Yordan stays healthy...if Altuve goes back to playing a competent 2B...if Correa stays healthy...if Cam Smith figures it out against RHP...etc. etc. I grew up watching the Astros in the 70s-90s and maybe my BAS is just too strong, but this feels a lot like when we would fall short every year back then and make very few changes and then go into the next season hoping things would be different.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
27 year old lefty with pop and strikeout issues that can play the OF just got DFA'd. Would seem to be minor league depth if he'd take that deal
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saw some thread traffic, hoped for something besides Paredes/Walker discussion.

Disappointed.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Saw some thread traffic, hoped for something besides Paredes/Walker discussion.

Disappointed.


It's going to be a long spring training.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Saw some thread traffic, hoped for something besides Paredes/Walker discussion.

Disappointed.

tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is Paredes/Walker discussion the new Jake vs Chas where it's just endless discussion all off-season?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

Is Paredes/Walker discussion the new Jake vs Chas where it's just endless discussion all off-season?

We can still talk about hitting coaches if you want, but I would have to go look up their names first.
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was there any interest on going after Mike Tauchman?
Mets signed him to a minor league contract. Seemed like he would have been a good fit for us.
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64 said:

So. Odds for what happens?

Paredes goes with a bigger return
Walker and money go and a smaller return
Neither go

I'm 50/10/40. And I hate that 40. That's the worst scenario by far.


40 is probably the best scenario for our team

Otherwise that 60 includes selling low on parades or Walker
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tjack16 said:

Is Paredes/Walker discussion the new Jake vs Chas where it's just endless discussion all off-season?

I still can't believe they broke up McStrawMick.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Not good for them right before a CBA negotiation
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:



Not good for them right before a CBA negotiation
perfect timing for Clark though (lol of course I didn't read the second tweet until I hit send, I'm sure his legal battle will work out fine for all involved)
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EastCoastAgNc said:



Not good for them right before a CBA negotiation
I mean, it's a union so yeah
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And the fact that pitchers think everything is a strike.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag_07 said:

And the fact that pitchers think everything is a strike.


It will be interesting the strategy of who is allowed to initiate the review. There may be some pitchers you do trust to make the call, but it does more often then not it should probably be the catcher.

On offense, I'll be interested in which batters are trusted to use the ABS.
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wouldn't all batters be trusted to use it? I thought each hitter in the lineup was given two chances per game depending on the result of the first challenge?
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinCountyAg said:

Wouldn't all batters be trusted to use it? I thought each hitter in the lineup was given two chances per game depending on the result of the first challenge?

yainer Diaz will challenge that sliders 15 feet outside were strikes and that's why he swung at them.
toucan82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it's 2 per team with the team keeping them if they're right
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I need to look up the rules because I thought it was just 2 challenges per team but you retain them if they're overturned.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope we're smart about when we use them. It needs to be the right situation where the run value is most impactful, but at the same time, I hope we use them (even in less critical times) since they don't rollover.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

I hope we're smart about when we use them. It needs to be the right situation where the run value is most impactful, but at the same time, I hope we use them (even in less critical times) since they don't rollover.

txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

And the fact that pitchers think everything is a strike.

Framber will use up both team challenges in the first inning unless Hinch puts a muzzle on him.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinCountyAg said:

Wouldn't all batters be trusted to use it? I thought each hitter in the lineup was given two chances per game depending on the result of the first challenge?

Is there a betting market on which player will challenge the most as I'd like to place a large wager on Breggy.
scd88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MLB is broken competitively. I don't care if an entire season is lost when there is a work stoppage. The players can pound sand. There needs to be more significant salary boundaries to alter the path of this league careening into a circus.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

AustinCountyAg said:

Wouldn't all batters be trusted to use it? I thought each hitter in the lineup was given two chances per game depending on the result of the first challenge?

Is there a betting market on which player will challenge the most as I'd like to place a large wager on Breggy.


I think the stronger market will be umpires most challenged, lol.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This got me thinking: who saw the most borderline pitches? Savant defines the area on the edges as "shadow".

Here is who led the league & team in most pitches in this zone.
MLB
1. Taylor Ward - 760: 410 balls, 348 strikes (1.18 balls to strikes)
2. Juan Soto - 757: 438, 316 (1.39)
3. Geraldo Perdomo - 749: 441, 306 (1.44)
4. James Wood - 728: 431, 296 (1.46)
5. Mike Trout - 713: 458, 253 (1.81)

Astros
1. Walker - 466: 299 balls, 167 called strikes (1.79 balls to strikes)
2. Paredes - 421: 226, 195 (1.16)
3. Smith - 416: 228, 188 (1.21)
4. Altuve - 416: 191, 221 (0.86)
5. Pena - 329: 170, 158 (1.08)

The way I look at this, these players were pitched hard more often. Seems like Walker and Trout got the benefit of the doubt on the close ones, while Altuve did not. Regardless, these are the guys who might be challenging more often based on 2025 data.

Here is who led the league and Astros in balls out of the zone called a strike.
MLB
1. Gleybar Torres - 66 (1571, 4.20%)
2. Taylor Ward - 64 (1739, 3.68%)
3. Chase Meidroth - 63 (1264, 4.98%)
4. Fernando Tatis Jr - 61 (1427, 4.27%)
5. Matt McClain - 60 (1343, 4.47%)
5. Seiya Suzuki - 60 (1619, 3.71%)
5. Marcell Ozuna - 60 (1596, 3.76%)

Astros
1. Altuve - 52 (1157 pitches total, 4.49%)
2. Walker - 39 (1200, 3.00%)
2. Paredes - 39 (1148, 3.40%)
3. Smith - 35 (1044, 3.74%)
5. Pena - 32 (871, 3.67%)

It looks very clear to me that Altuve got screwed big time by the umps last season. I hope he feels confident challenging.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hard to believe anyone got hosed more than Walker.

Just sticks out in my mind how many times he got rung on borderline pitches.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Based on the data he got more favorable calls than most.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Called Strike 3 on a pitch outside of the zone
5 - Meyers, Pena, Paredes, Walker
4 - Caratini, Smith
3 - Dubon

It did happen to Walker quite a few times but % wise Meyers has the most to ***** about.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess Meyers can't ***** too much. Looks like it was offset.

Balls 4 on pitches in the zone
5 - Meyers
4 - no one
3 - Pena, Altuve, Walker
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Glad we didn't trade for him.

First Page Last Page
Page 205 of 248
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.