Human Resources

11,584 Views | 92 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by YouBet
FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A great HR department is a HUGE advantage for any business. Unfortunate there are a lot more terrible ones than great ones.

When you find an HR professional who (1) deeply understands your business (2) have a desire to help the business's leaders rather than control them and (3) can do math


You pay those people what it takes to keep them and you make them leaders.
Petrino1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FrioAg 00 said:

A great HR department is a HUGE advantage for any business. Unfortunate there are a lot more terrible ones than great ones.

When you find an HR professional who (1) deeply understands your business (2) have a desire to help the business's leaders rather than control them and (3) can do math


You pay those people what it takes to keep them and you make them leaders.
100% spot on.
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

Carlo4 said:

My wife's firm pulled a move out of the Office similar to Meredith getting a pass for saving the company money. Her group went to HR for work harassment claims with evidence along with one claim of sexual harassment. Talking 7 or 8 different people. Essentially, he brought in clients/revenue to the company when times were tough so the female executives turned a blind eye to it. HR stepped in to train my wife and the staff on harassment along with a written warning against the women filing the claim.

My wife removed herself from her job and transferred out to another area. All 8 transferred out of the clinic within a few months. She told me recently it's still going on and nothing being done about it. One of the women looks exactly like his wife so he makes very inappropriate jokes. Funny part is of the people that were harassed, two are one position away from having a say in his career path. They haven't forgotten.

If she lasts long enough at this crap job, I cannot wait to see what happens.


This is where you sue the employer for retaliation and bank enough to retire.


Fun follow up. My wife found out from her supervisor yesterday that she is labeled a flight risk in the company and won't be promoted even if warranted until she shows she can change her attitude. The reasons why are below:

Update on him: Wife found out through supervisor yesterday that he will be fired upon hiring a replacement is finalized as the additional 2 dozen complaints of ignorance/doing a bad job at work can't be ignored.

Been with company three years. Had two run ins with management that led her to putting in notice but came back to empty promises.

First, a manager tried to ruin her reputation/career for "fun" and created massive drama bringing in executives. Wife reprimanded. The manager was fired 6 months later after they realized she did this to nearly everyone. No apology given after my wife vindicated

Second instance was mentioned above. She has been vindicated a second time with no apology.

After she quit, she stayed with the company due to a promotion promise that took 6 months longer than promised. After all that, she came back after the pregnancy (and given a bonus for it). It's been about 7-8 weeks since returning.

Her annual review with her boss and an executive is next week. I bought her a shirt with an airplane on it so she can wear it to the meeting.
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carlo4 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Carlo4 said:

My wife's firm pulled a move out of the Office similar to Meredith getting a pass for saving the company money. Her group went to HR for work harassment claims with evidence along with one claim of sexual harassment. Talking 7 or 8 different people. Essentially, he brought in clients/revenue to the company when times were tough so the female executives turned a blind eye to it. HR stepped in to train my wife and the staff on harassment along with a written warning against the women filing the claim.

My wife removed herself from her job and transferred out to another area. All 8 transferred out of the clinic within a few months. She told me recently it's still going on and nothing being done about it. One of the women looks exactly like his wife so he makes very inappropriate jokes. Funny part is of the people that were harassed, two are one position away from having a say in his career path. They haven't forgotten.

If she lasts long enough at this crap job, I cannot wait to see what happens.


This is where you sue the employer for retaliation and bank enough to retire.


Fun follow up. My wife found out from her supervisor yesterday that she is labeled a flight risk in the company and won't be promoted even if warranted until she shows she can change her attitude. The reasons why are below:

Update on him: Wife found out through supervisor yesterday that he will be fired upon hiring a replacement is finalized as the additional 2 dozen complaints of ignorance/doing a bad job at work can't be ignored.

Been with company three years. Had two run ins with management that led her to putting in notice but came back to empty promises.

First, a manager tried to ruin her reputation/career for "fun" and created massive drama bringing in executives. Wife reprimanded. The manager was fired 6 months later after they realized she did this to nearly everyone. No apology given after my wife vindicated

Second instance was mentioned above. She has been vindicated a second time with no apology.

After she quit, she stayed with the company due to a promotion promise that took 6 months longer than promised. After all that, she came back after the pregnancy (and given a bonus for it). It's been about 7-8 weeks since returning.

Her annual review with her boss and an executive is next week. I bought her a shirt with an airplane on it so she can wear it to the meeting.
huh?
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wrong word my bad. She put in her notice and stayed with the company after they claimed she would promote her right away.
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gotcha

Sounds like an awful situation but you guys can't pretend to be surprised by this behavior at this point.

Being promoted into a toxic environment doesn't sound like a great long term solution.

She either needs to take things to more formal channels, sue, or quit (or some combination of the 3).

PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She needs to quit.
cohibasymas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We hired our first true HR person about 5 weeks ago. Director level hire. He's been a phenomenal resource to our executive team and employees. Truly outstanding. Sorry you guys are having a negative experience I'm sure that's tough.
Four Seasons Landscaping
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the accountants came for my productivity, I did nothing, I kept good records.

When IT came for my productivity, I was quiet, I don't open phishing e-mails.

Now HR comes for what is left of the joy in my job and there is nobody left to speak up for me.
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Diggity said:

Gotcha

Sounds like an awful situation but you guys can't pretend to be surprised by this behavior at this point.

Being promoted into a toxic environment doesn't sound like a great long term solution.

She either needs to take things to more formal channels, sue, or quit (or some combination of the 3).




Her entire industry works this way. Pretty tough. What's shocking is upper management. They are all between 25-30 except for the CEO and COO. You can tell they don't have the experience or care to run a good ship.

Our agreement was the next promotion was work from home and away from all the drama. If you didn't land it, leave.

I'll be so very thankful when she leaves, but I'll miss all the BSC stories I hear.
Cynic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Four Seasons Landscaping said:

When the accountants came for my productivity, I did nothing, I kept good records.

When IT came for my productivity, I was quiet, I don't open phishing e-mails.

Now HR comes for what is left of the joy in my job and there is nobody left to speak up for me.


Lol, okay.

I get it some departments are annoying but this is dumb.
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which industry? The mafia?
ATM9000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's just be blunt instead of *****ing about HR for all our problems. HR a is a control function. It would be great if every hiring manager was a great leader who did the right thing every time and never self serving. But… that's not reality. So big companies and boards of directors need an HR function to keep people honest.

I've worked risk analytics for most of my career which is more of an advisory function than a decision making one. It isn't fun to be the one to tell a business that the analysis my team has done says there's better ways to utilize risk resources than what they are looking at. But it isn't personal usually because we aren't dealing directly with that person's personal bottom line… we are dealing with somebody else's money and resources.

HR is the one function that's doing that for everybody's personal bottom line and around the hardest headaches to solve: actual people ones. This is the real reason people get so personally fired up about HR and how terrible they are and they are the worst. It has nothing to do with them being the worst people and power hungry and everything to do with they are the wet blanket function on either your personal bottom line or people close to you's bottom line or the ones that have to enforce that no you can't just hire some guy off the street to do stuff when times are tough and you just need a warm body to do stuff when you've been clear about all the qualifications absolutely necessary for a role or all of the above.

So my advice is don't take it all so personally and realize they actually are doing things your business has deemed necessary and be respectful about their qualifications and what they have to do as well. They should be deemed much more than just the people who type up offer letters and explain benefits.

And to the guy who says The business is HR's 'customer'. Word of advice: just stop that not just for HR but for any function that works for the same organization as you. Because it just isn't true. You are all working to drive the most value and protect one set of resources as best as possible with how the real decision makers have decided they need to be protected and driven.
BenTheGoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATM9000 said:

And to the guy who says The business is HR's 'customer'. Word of advice: just stop that not just for HR but for any function that works for the same organization as you. Because it just isn't true. You are all working to drive the most value and protect one set of resources as best as possible with how the real decision makers have decided they need to be protected and driven.
100% disagree with this. And since I made the comment earlier, I guess it's directed at me.

There is such a thing as an internal customer. I have many. I'm careful to make commitments, communicate issues, and follow through to my word. If I can't do that, downstream users in our business fail and I'm held accountable.

There are absolutely elements of HR that are in a defined support role, even by the Sr. Leadership of our company. Recruiting is an obvious example. Conversely, there are elements of HR that are not a support role, ie ethics/employee relations. There are good reasons that they are 3rd party to the issues that they get into.
ATM9000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenTheGoodAg said:

ATM9000 said:

And to the guy who says The business is HR's 'customer'. Word of advice: just stop that not just for HR but for any function that works for the same organization as you. Because it just isn't true. You are all working to drive the most value and protect one set of resources as best as possible with how the real decision makers have decided they need to be protected and driven.
100% disagree with this. And since I made the comment earlier, I guess it's directed at me.

There is such a thing as an internal customer. I have many. I'm careful to make commitments, communicate issues, and follow through to my word. If I can't do that, downstream users in our business fail and I'm held accountable.

There are absolutely elements of HR that are in a defined support role, even by the Sr. Leadership of our company. Recruiting is an obvious example. Conversely, there are elements of HR that are not a support role, ie ethics/employee relations. There are good reasons that they are 3rd party to the issues that they get into.

We are on a sports website so I'll lay out this analogy: if you are the quarterback and your left tackle sucks and you end up with your face in the grass every other play, you'd never say you were the tackle's customer… but you would probably have some things to say to the tackle as well as the coach. Just because you have accountabilities and people rely on you for things, doesn't make you people's customer. My family relies on me to take my daughter to school every morning. It is my responsibility and I'm accountable for it but my daughter and wife aren't my customers. It's a partnership still. That's really really key and why I think the idea of internal customers is stupid.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATM9000 said:

BenTheGoodAg said:

ATM9000 said:

And to the guy who says The business is HR's 'customer'. Word of advice: just stop that not just for HR but for any function that works for the same organization as you. Because it just isn't true. You are all working to drive the most value and protect one set of resources as best as possible with how the real decision makers have decided they need to be protected and driven.
100% disagree with this. And since I made the comment earlier, I guess it's directed at me.

There is such a thing as an internal customer. I have many. I'm careful to make commitments, communicate issues, and follow through to my word. If I can't do that, downstream users in our business fail and I'm held accountable.

There are absolutely elements of HR that are in a defined support role, even by the Sr. Leadership of our company. Recruiting is an obvious example. Conversely, there are elements of HR that are not a support role, ie ethics/employee relations. There are good reasons that they are 3rd party to the issues that they get into.

We are on a sports website so I'll lay out this analogy: if you are the quarterback and your left tackle sucks and you end up with your face in the grass every other play, you'd never say you were the tackle's customer… but you would probably have some things to say to the tackle as well as the coach. Just because you have accountabilities and people rely on you for things, doesn't make you people's customer. My family relies on me to take my daughter to school every morning. It is my responsibility and I'm accountable for it but my daughter and wife aren't my customers. It's a partnership still. That's really really key and why I think the idea of internal customers is stupid.
It might be stupid but it's reality in many, many companies. We had Internal Customer metrics and goals in our PAs depending on the role. This is probably a semantics argument and depends on the specific culture of the company if they talk in terms of "partner" or "internal customer".
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea I think it's splitting hairs a bit to put such a huge divide between the two.
ATM9000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

ATM9000 said:

BenTheGoodAg said:

ATM9000 said:

And to the guy who says The business is HR's 'customer'. Word of advice: just stop that not just for HR but for any function that works for the same organization as you. Because it just isn't true. You are all working to drive the most value and protect one set of resources as best as possible with how the real decision makers have decided they need to be protected and driven.
100% disagree with this. And since I made the comment earlier, I guess it's directed at me.

There is such a thing as an internal customer. I have many. I'm careful to make commitments, communicate issues, and follow through to my word. If I can't do that, downstream users in our business fail and I'm held accountable.

There are absolutely elements of HR that are in a defined support role, even by the Sr. Leadership of our company. Recruiting is an obvious example. Conversely, there are elements of HR that are not a support role, ie ethics/employee relations. There are good reasons that they are 3rd party to the issues that they get into.

We are on a sports website so I'll lay out this analogy: if you are the quarterback and your left tackle sucks and you end up with your face in the grass every other play, you'd never say you were the tackle's customer… but you would probably have some things to say to the tackle as well as the coach. Just because you have accountabilities and people rely on you for things, doesn't make you people's customer. My family relies on me to take my daughter to school every morning. It is my responsibility and I'm accountable for it but my daughter and wife aren't my customers. It's a partnership still. That's really really key and why I think the idea of internal customers is stupid.
It might be stupid but it's reality in many, many companies. We had Internal Customer metrics and goals in our PAs depending on the role. This is probably a semantics argument and depends on the specific culture of the company if they talk in terms of "partner" or "internal customer".
Big semantics difference though. A customer implies a highly transactional relationship. A partner is you are in business together for the long haul.

Like many things, so much of your view is defined by your attitude. When I first became a hiring manager years ago, I remember complaining about recruiting not having their **** together and moving slow and not getting me good candidates, loads of naval gazing and whinging about them not doing their job. Open roles on my team would sit open for months. It was embarrassing and it took me a while to get it.

Recruiting and bringing in the right people is hard and takes a lot of thought not just a couple of emails to follow up to check a box. Internal recruiters are generally looking at tons of roles at one time. There are managers who are highly engaged in all of that and others who just copy the last job spec, throw it to HR and say let me know when you have somebody. The former get good people quickly… the latter… complain that HR isn't following up for their customer. This is the same for every other bit you have accountability for at work.

If you want HR to move quicker on stuff like this, treat them like a partner. When I have an open role to fill on my team now… it is my #1 priority. I'm typically talking to the internal recruiter every other day, test screening resumes with them so they know what I'm after, asking for their feedback on what I'm looking for… basically, doing everything I can to make their job easier. It takes loads of time but I generally end up with 3-4 very good candidates to interview and roles filled in the matter of weeks rather than months.

I guess my advice here generally is if you look at HR as some sort of service function, don't really engage actively with them because you view them as just those pains in the rears in the back office ready to ruin your plans… then I don't really understand what your general expectation is. Treat them like partners instead and you'll get loads more out of the relationship and maybe even learn a thing or 2.
Ezra Brooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
20 years as an HR pro in big and mid-sized oil/gas companies.

HR is a lot like Real Estate - low barrier to entry. You've got agents that really earn their money by helping you through the process and those that only know how to fill out the generic forms. That makes those of us that have educated ourselves inn the function and committed to doing it well look poor - it's frustrating to be associated with that.

As an HR advisor to the business, I generally think about my approach in two ways:

1 - my goal is to say yes/do what my managers request - but sometimes I need to get them to ask a different question and others I need to convince them not to ask at all.

2 - I kinda view myself like a finance advisor - it's your money, so ultimately, it's your call. But my job is to offer suggestions, discuss pros/cons, etc. before you make the decision and then to go make the trade. See #1 above.

BenTheGoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You've already made it clear my position is stupid. I'm not really sure if it's necessary or worth either of our time for me to respond, but I'll leave it at this. I understand the importance of a partnership. Here's what I originally said earlier in the thread:
BenTheGoodAg said:

HR has a great opportunity to be a partner, but for many of us they're not. I've had a two very good partners in HR that understand we are their customer, and they help us be successful and keep us out of trouble.
The semantics of the term 'customer' is how you frame who is in the support vs. the lead role under said 'partnership'. And, as described by many people in this thread, HR across the board continues to see themselves in the lead role in areas where they really should be providing support. That doesn't mean HR needs to be completely submissive, but the consensus is that there's a growing trend of HR organizations that are defining the requirements, informing business decisions, and overriding the accountable organizations often to the detriment of their overall business.

Bravo to the good HR professionals who work alongside their respective teams. I've already called out two in my working history that have done so well.
Petrino1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ezra Brooks said:

20 years as an HR pro in big and mid-sized oil/gas companies.

HR is a lot like Real Estate - low barrier to entry. You've got agents that really earn their money by helping you through the process and those that only know how to fill out the generic forms. That makes those of us that have educated ourselves inn the function and committed to doing it well look poor - it's frustrating to be associated with that.

As an HR advisor to the business, I generally think about my approach in two ways:

1 - my goal is to say yes/do what my managers request - but sometimes I need to get them to ask a different question and others I need to convince them not to ask at all.

2 - I kinda view myself like a finance advisor - it's your money, so ultimately, it's your call. But my job is to offer suggestions, discuss pros/cons, etc. before you make the decision and then to go make the trade. See #1 above.


I completely agree with all of this. So true about the low barrier to entry thing. Thats why there are so many crappy recruiters out there. But the good ones are paid well and in high demand.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATM9000 said:

YouBet said:

ATM9000 said:

BenTheGoodAg said:

ATM9000 said:

And to the guy who says The business is HR's 'customer'. Word of advice: just stop that not just for HR but for any function that works for the same organization as you. Because it just isn't true. You are all working to drive the most value and protect one set of resources as best as possible with how the real decision makers have decided they need to be protected and driven.
100% disagree with this. And since I made the comment earlier, I guess it's directed at me.

There is such a thing as an internal customer. I have many. I'm careful to make commitments, communicate issues, and follow through to my word. If I can't do that, downstream users in our business fail and I'm held accountable.

There are absolutely elements of HR that are in a defined support role, even by the Sr. Leadership of our company. Recruiting is an obvious example. Conversely, there are elements of HR that are not a support role, ie ethics/employee relations. There are good reasons that they are 3rd party to the issues that they get into.

We are on a sports website so I'll lay out this analogy: if you are the quarterback and your left tackle sucks and you end up with your face in the grass every other play, you'd never say you were the tackle's customer… but you would probably have some things to say to the tackle as well as the coach. Just because you have accountabilities and people rely on you for things, doesn't make you people's customer. My family relies on me to take my daughter to school every morning. It is my responsibility and I'm accountable for it but my daughter and wife aren't my customers. It's a partnership still. That's really really key and why I think the idea of internal customers is stupid.
It might be stupid but it's reality in many, many companies. We had Internal Customer metrics and goals in our PAs depending on the role. This is probably a semantics argument and depends on the specific culture of the company if they talk in terms of "partner" or "internal customer".
Big semantics difference though. A customer implies a highly transactional relationship. A partner is you are in business together for the long haul.

Like many things, so much of your view is defined by your attitude. When I first became a hiring manager years ago, I remember complaining about recruiting not having their **** together and moving slow and not getting me good candidates, loads of naval gazing and whinging about them not doing their job. Open roles on my team would sit open for months. It was embarrassing and it took me a while to get it.

Recruiting and bringing in the right people is hard and takes a lot of thought not just a couple of emails to follow up to check a box. Internal recruiters are generally looking at tons of roles at one time. There are managers who are highly engaged in all of that and others who just copy the last job spec, throw it to HR and say let me know when you have somebody. The former get good people quickly… the latter… complain that HR isn't following up for their customer. This is the same for every other bit you have accountability for at work.

If you want HR to move quicker on stuff like this, treat them like a partner. When I have an open role to fill on my team now… it is my #1 priority. I'm typically talking to the internal recruiter every other day, test screening resumes with them so they know what I'm after, asking for their feedback on what I'm looking for… basically, doing everything I can to make their job easier. It takes loads of time but I generally end up with 3-4 very good candidates to interview and roles filled in the matter of weeks rather than months.

I guess my advice here generally is if you look at HR as some sort of service function, don't really engage actively with them because you view them as just those pains in the rears in the back office ready to ruin your plans… then I don't really understand what your general expectation is. Treat them like partners instead and you'll get loads more out of the relationship and maybe even learn a thing or 2.
BentheGoodAg kind of beat me to my response. I don't disagree with you here. I've lived this life just as you have and I did my best to partner with HR and I did all the things you outlined here in my corporate career.

The problem in 2022 is that many HR organizations are now empire building and trying to move beyond partner to overseer and trying to pull in functions that have no business in HR. My wife is living this right now at her F500 company. HR has become a hinderance and roadblock to logic and common sense.

And the level of incompetence is now beyond the pale. This is all a direct result of HR getting too big for their britches and sacrificing their core strengths to be someone they shouldn't.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carlo4 said:

Diggity said:

Gotcha

Sounds like an awful situation but you guys can't pretend to be surprised by this behavior at this point.

Being promoted into a toxic environment doesn't sound like a great long term solution.

She either needs to take things to more formal channels, sue, or quit (or some combination of the 3).




Her entire industry works this way. Pretty tough. What's shocking is upper management. They are all between 25-30 except for the CEO and COO. You can tell they don't have the experience or care to run a good ship.

Our agreement was the next promotion was work from home and away from all the drama. If you didn't land it, leave.

I'll be so very thankful when she leaves, but I'll miss all the BSC stories I hear.


Well, how did your wife's review go?
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HR has grown beyond basic payroll and benefits stuff to keep type A bosses / company out of trouble.


But it's not that HR has grown so much as a sideways grin can be big trouble nowadays. The definition of trouble has expanded exponentially

PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Humorous Username said:

Carlo4 said:

Diggity said:

Gotcha

Sounds like an awful situation but you guys can't pretend to be surprised by this behavior at this point.

Being promoted into a toxic environment doesn't sound like a great long term solution.

She either needs to take things to more formal channels, sue, or quit (or some combination of the 3).




Her entire industry works this way. Pretty tough. What's shocking is upper management. They are all between 25-30 except for the CEO and COO. You can tell they don't have the experience or care to run a good ship.

Our agreement was the next promotion was work from home and away from all the drama. If you didn't land it, leave.

I'll be so very thankful when she leaves, but I'll miss all the BSC stories I hear.


Well, how did your wife's review go?


Company bought out.
Many executives gone.
Wife had top review in metroplex but no promotion
New execs say my wife will never be promoted in private
Leaks
Now saying "another 3-6 months"
She believes if she works harder she will get it.
Does work of three staff currently. Paid for one.

Meanwhile she works 4-6 AM, 8-5 and now 8pm to midnight five night a week with an infant.

I'll let you guess how I feel.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Simple. Find another job then quit. Or quit now.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry to hear.

Can you at least tell us the broader industry she works in so that we can avoid ending up there?

You mentioned the word "clinic" in an earlier post. I'm assuming something with healthcare.
evestor1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad someone bumped this - the HR lady that i started this post about has been removed from company!


It was a different type of layoff where peopel in the hallways afterwards said only bad things about her...several wished her to never be hired again.


great times
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mas89 said:

Simple. Find another job then quit. Or quit now.
We are having a long talk this weekend. She has severe ADHD, so what is insane to us in terms of hours/time doesn't process the same to her.

I think a "normal" person would have been out a long time ago.
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Humorous Username said:

Sorry to hear.

Can you at least tell us the broader industry she works in so that we can avoid ending up there?

You mentioned the word "clinic" in an earlier post. I'm assuming something with healthcare.
She is a board certified behavior analyst (BCBA) specializing in working with children on the Autism spectrum. She currently manages 3 clinics in two cities that are about a 30 minute drive apart in typical traffic. She used to work with the kids directly, and is/was moving into management.

It is a very rewarding profession, but a time killer with paperwork, stress, etc. There are not enough employable people for the number of diagnosed kids, so lots of hours.





YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry to hear that Carlo. Hopefully, you can get some balance back.

Update on my front since I posted here...my wife has since parachuted out of her company. I can't go into details but HR has completely usurped the power dynamic at her company and she finally just said, "F* this; I'm out."

She is now retired.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh, man.

My son is on the spectrum, so now I just feel terrible.
aggiebq03+
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone had HR pull them into a call to say an employee had been investigated for raising their voice and cursing at someone?

Is it appropriate to take that employee aside in a coaching moment, and advise them "Please stop ****ing cursing at whiney people."?

Asking for a friend.
Who may have already had that coaching moment…
EFR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have had to have that exact conversation several times, it works well because the "offender" usually can figure out exactly who complained and can avoid future issues with them.
Speaking of HR, we have had exactly one good one in the 16 years I have been here, people still talk about how wonderful she was to deal with. It has been fascinating to watch that department go downhill in performance yet somehow gain influence and power since she left.
Petrino1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ahh the HR thread bump lol. The problem I see is that literally everything gets blamed on HR these days, when its typically someone else's fault.

I got fired. I blame HR

There was a massive layoff at my company. Its HR's fault.

I didn't get the job I applied for. Stupid HR for not selecting me.

My company is promoting Diversity initiatives. Damn HR and their woke agenda.

I can't fire a lazy employee (who is a black female) a week after she started. Freakin HR and their stupid policies.

I want to hire someone with 15 years experience and my budget is $40k/year. Worthless HR cant find me any good candidates.

All of the above scenarios are things I hear on a regular basis at my company, or from other people. And none of these things are the fault of HR.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.