SS: are you taking at 62 or 70?

13,925 Views | 125 Replies | Last: 16 hrs ago by RAB83
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A. G. Pennypacker said:

MemphisAg1 said:

I thought for many years I would probably start at 62, but as that approaches within four months I've had a shift in thinking. This question shouldn't be answered in isolation. It should be considered in the context of your broader portfolio. When I retire in less than a year, I need about five years to convert my pre-tax 401k to a Roth 401k and stay within the 24% tax bracket on those conversions. I was in higher tax brackets when that money was set aside, so this move will legally avoid substantial taxes and position those funds for tax free growth in the future.

To temporarily avoid additional income and stay in the 24% tax bracket, I need to delay taking social security until 67 and complete those Roth conversions from 62 to 67. Especially while tax rates are relatively low by historical standards. The nice thing with SS is that my benefit at 67 will be much higher than at 62.

Delaying SS and converting to Roths now also has the advantage of keeping my MAGI in future years much lower because Roth distributions aren't included in MAGI -- and by extension -- keeping my future Medicare premiums low and not subject to an IRMA (income-related monthly adjustment) premium hike.

I've modeled a variety of scenarios, and it's much better for my total portfolio to delay SS to 67. I realize it's different depending on your personal situation, but delaying makes more sense for me, which is counter-intuitive to what I thought for many years prior.

Has anyone found good on-line tool for evaluating / comparing doing Roth conversions after retirement vs not doing it? There are a lot of variables to consider as you mention, but I haven't found a good tool for telling me if it's really the right thing to do or not - depending on individual circumstances.

Maybe I look at it a little too simply, but you're going to pay taxes on that money when you take it out of a pre-tax 401k/IRA, or they will make you take it out at age 73 thru RMDs and pay taxes on it. There's no way to avoid the tax. The key is to withdraw/convert it at as low a tax rate as possible. The beauty of a conversion -- especially if you have the funds to pay taxes in a non-retirement account without reducing the size of your 401k/IRA -- is it grows tax free forever after conversion. And when you eventually withdraw from that Roth it isn't included in your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), which helps keep your Medicare premiums low.
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is professional software like holistiaplan and income lab that can model it and I think Boldin is starting to add it.

For most people it doesn't move the needle much (a good plan isn't wrecked by not doing it and a bad plan isn't saved by doing it). It usually only makes a meaningful difference in people who plan to withdraw little to nothing from their traditional IRA in the early years of retirement bc they have so much in after tax. People in that situation are often in lower tax brackets due to low taxes on long term capital gains and qualified dividends. They also have the luxury of being able to pay the tax on the Roth conversion with money from outside of the IRA. I worked with a couple withdrawaling $180k a year in retirement but it was mostly LTCG and since they were only taxed on the gains it's only $80k in taxable income so 0% tax rate. They ended up Roth converting until they owed about $10k in taxes.

If you are like most retirees and plan to live off your traditional IRA throughout retirement, your normal withdrawals will likely cover your RMDs anyway so they become way less scary.

Doing Roth conversions early in retirement also expose you to more sequence of return risk bc you are pulling more spending(the taxes on the conversions) into your early retirement years.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have gone back and forth between fra and 70. Fra is in a few months . Right now I'm thinking I'll wait to 70 as the SS income would cripple my ability to convert Traditional Ira's to Roth's and defuse at least some of the RMD bomb I have coming at 73. 90% of my liquid assets are in traditional Ira's and the rest is tax paid money/stocks. My tax rates would go up significantly if I took SS now as the conversions are also income. Could change my mind if SS were really to go to non-taxable tho.
FourAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I started early. The economics of today vs deferral said take it today. Family life expectancy said take it today. Lastly, if there's going to be any future SS changes, I think being grandfathered in will be impacted less than those not enrolled yet.
JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am 64, plan to work a few more years but not start SS until 70
Holistic Planning
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
Folks should consider of course the basic math of looking at life expectancy for themselves and also consider spousal/survivor benefits when making the decision.

Also make sure you consider that the tax implications and Medicare IRMAA implications.

It sometimes makes sense to delay social security and do Roth conversions while spending non qualified money to live on. Then when you draw social security at later age it can potentially be tax free or more of it can be tax free.
www.holisticplanning.com/intro
Remarkably personal financial advice for a fuller life.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JobSecurity said:

Any considerations for those looking to retire early, say 55 or so? In my head taking it at 62 would alleviate some of the sequence of returns risk?

yes- this is exactly what I am doing

also having a full year of expenses in cash

and Israel government 5 year bonds paying out 5.4% locked in

I think technically sequence of returns risk is the first two or three years after retiring- not 7 years into it (if you retire at 55) but I understand your point.
HarleySpoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GoAgs92 said:

Spouse 62, me 66.5, she will get half of mine so may as well get some early.

This is all inheritance dependent, she will get at least $500k once probate is done so maybe 62 for both.

Double check me but I think: She will get half yours while you are still alive, but her survivors benefit will be what you would have gotten at full retirement age…67.
HarleySpoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am 61 and had bypass surgery five weeks ago. Wife has never worked for the last 30 years and will likely live into her 90's. I plan on working into my 70's….Lord willing. I'm taking it the earlier of 67 or when I stop working. They penalize you way too much for taking it early while you still have a great job. Be sure you don't have a high income if you're thinking about taking before 67.
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I might be being pedantic here but its not really a penalty for claiming while you are working. They just hold part of your check back and its added to your check once you reach full retirement age.
HarleySpoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
permabull said:

I might be being pedantic here but its not really a penalty for claiming while you are working. They just hold part of your check back and its added to your check once you reach full retirement age.

Not being pedantic at all....I just didn't want to go into too much detail for the broader audience. Yes, if you live long enough you will eventually get it back, but it dribbles back in and having just had bypass surgery at age 60, I'm not willing to take that payback risk; and I want my wife to not be penalized in the amount of her survivor's benefit.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have found 4. Boldin, SmartRetireCalc, MaxiFi Planner, and i-ORP. The last one is online and free so I'm going to try it first.

Welp, i-ORP is no longer available so scratch that one.
MyMamaSaid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A. G. Pennypacker said:

Has anyone found good on-line tool for evaluating / comparing doing Roth conversions after retirement vs not doing it? There are a lot of variables to consider as you mention, but I haven't found a good tool for telling me if it's really the right thing to do or not - depending on individual circumstances.

ProjectionLab now has a robust optimization function as of about a month ago that I think is great input. I say input because the model works off all of the assumptions you build into it, and if taken too literally looks like a definitive outcome. PL isn't free, but I use it to compliment other channels of advice I get.
GoAgs92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HarleySpoon said:

GoAgs92 said:

Spouse 62, me 66.5, she will get half of mine so may as well get some early.

This is all inheritance dependent, she will get at least $500k once probate is done so maybe 62 for both.

Double check me but I think: She will get half yours while you are still alive, but her survivors benefit will be what you would have gotten at full retirement age…67.

Correctamundo! so we get some sweet moolah and then if kick the bucket she gets my SS.

one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I actually started mine at 64 but was still working and planning slow down to the point I did not run afoul of the earnings test. When it was certain that was not going to happen, I decided to withdraw my application, pay back what I had been paid, and then apply at FRA.

I am the world's worst procrastinator, and particularly on Fridays. I got to wondering about when my deadline was for doing this, (you have one year in which you can withdraw and repay and it is as if nothing had happened.) I knew my benefits had started in June or so the previous year. So one Friday I started trying to find out the scoop on this. I call social security and the lady said let me look that up. I told her I had started in June and she says that doesn't matter, the year time period starts when you are entitled to benefits. I asked what day did the time period expire, she said something like May 11th (it happened to be the day I was calling.) I said as in today? She said yep. It was right after lunch but I shot out of the office and I drove 40 miles to their office and got it withdrawn. Lucky I happened to call, lol.
HarleySpoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GoAgs92 said:

HarleySpoon said:

GoAgs92 said:

Spouse 62, me 66.5, she will get half of mine so may as well get some early.

This is all inheritance dependent, she will get at least $500k once probate is done so maybe 62 for both.

Double check me but I think: She will get half yours while you are still alive, but her survivors benefit will be what you would have gotten at full retirement age…67.

Correctamundo! so we get some sweet moolah and then if kick the bucket she gets my SS.





I think…..think…..that even if she takes hers early and collects less on hers, she gets what you would have gotten at 67. Interesting dynamic if you don't expect to get too far past 70 and she expects to live to 98. Not a lot of penalty/risk if she goes ahead and collects at 62 if I'm still making well past maximum. She will either get it back if I live a long time or not miss out on payback if I die and she starts collecting my full amount. Make sense in your eyes?
TrustTheAwesomeness
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MyMamaSaid said:

A. G. Pennypacker said:

Has anyone found good on-line tool for evaluating / comparing doing Roth conversions after retirement vs not doing it? There are a lot of variables to consider as you mention, but I haven't found a good tool for telling me if it's really the right thing to do or not - depending on individual circumstances.

ProjectionLab now has a robust optimization function as of about a month ago that I think is great input. I say input because the model works off all of the assumptions you build into it, and if taken too literally looks like a definitive outcome. PL isn't free, but I use it to compliment other channels of advice I get.

I would highly suggest ProjectionLab, especially since the upgrade mentioned by MyMamaSaid (epic handle for suggestions). I've tried Boldin also, but for a very analytical engineer ProjectionLab suited my needs best.

I'm 60 and going to 80% in a month, 60% this fall, and full retire sometime next year. ProjectionLab has helped immensely. My wife likes the yearly cash-flow graphs because it makes it easy to see in-flow and out-flow, especially if you break out things like travel, house upgrades, cars,...

The optimizer is interesting. I had it figure out that I can do some reasonable ROTH conversions in the next 3 years and get my MAGI low enough to get ACA subsidies for the 2 years between COBRA and Medicare. It did it in about 10 minutes of me playing with settings. It would have taken me hours to model everything in Excel.

Oh, and 67-ish for SS for us. Seems to be the sweep spot for us.

Retired Principal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our financial advisor recommends that we wait until 67. I collect a pension from the Teacher Retirement System, but have enough quarters to qualify for SS. My wife's SS will be much higher than mine, so I can get up to half of hers with no offset due the SS Fairness Act. This thread has me conflicted on what we should do.
I bleed maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Retired Principal said:

Our financial advisor recommends that we wait until 67. I collect a pension from the Teacher Retirement System, but have enough quarters to qualify for SS. My wife's SS will be much higher than mine, so I can get up to half of hers with no offset due the SS Fairness Act. This thread has me conflicted on what we should do.

This thread, almost by definition, is biased by each individual's situation, which is entirely expected and appropriate. There is no one with the exact set of circumstances you have for your retirement. Take these anecdotes from others as food for thought, but think through or get professional advice on your own unique situation, and don't stress about "getting it right" per the definition of others.
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree trust your guy, but I think it would be fair to ask his advisor if there would be any downside to him claiming now then switching to half his wife's once she starts collecting.
I bleed maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
permabull said:

I agree trust your guy, but I think it would be fair to ask his advisor if there would be any downside to him claiming now then switching to half his wife's once she starts collecting.

Isn't that exactly what I recommended?
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
anyone know how much additional income one has to make in dollars -

to push yourself into a higher tax bracket when first taking out social security payments?
TrustTheAwesomeness
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

anyone know how much additional income one has to make in dollars -

to push yourself into a higher tax bracket when first taking out social security payments?

Depending on age, there are earning limits to even get your SS.

https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/whileworking.html

If you go over, it gets complicated but essentially you just don't get SS for those months. Then eventually (I think when you hit full retirement age [67]), you get a SS bump as if you filed that many months later. I just listened to a podcast that indicated this stupid rule might go away. It costs the government money and they manage it like a government program, meaning badly and slowly.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not 100% sure I understand your question but AARP has a free 1040 calculator for estimating your taxes. You don't have to be an AARP member to use it. If you have a good idea of what your SS income will be in any given yr and income other than wages (cap gains, dividends, interest , royalties, rents , etc) then you should be able to back calculate max earned income to keep out of the next bracket.
Maroon Elephant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll take it at 62, regardless of health or financial status at that time. I want to get my hands on it as quickly as possible so I can invest it before Uncle Sam throws another round of massive inflation our way. I expect inflation booms to hit hard every 5 years from now until the end of this American experiment.
Ag CPA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm 50 but I plan on starting at 62 (although I fully expect this threshold to be moved up by Congress before then). (1) I *hope* to be retired by then and (2) although I am in good shape today, there is enough history of heart disease in my family that living to be 80-90 probably isn't in the cards; sucks but it is what it is at least for now.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
just making sure those planning to claim early do realize the future payment values would include annual inflation adjustment
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will you still be working?
spud1910
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I will be 63 the end of May. At this point, I am planning to wait until FRA. I enjoy what I do and earn enough that it would reduce my SS benefit to zero if I understand the process. Early 2027 seems to be the date to start receiving benfits. But if I use their calculator, it seems it would only reduce my benefit by about $800. If that is the case, I may need to rethink it.
GasAg90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
permabull said:

A common strategy is for the spouse with the lower lifetime earnings to claim at 62 then the higher earner to claim at 70. Depending on how much less the spouse who claimed first check was they might get a raise once the higher earning spouse starts claiming (I.e. if their check was less than half the higher earners check they can start claiming off the higher earner's record). This way whoever survives the longest will inherit the larger check for the rest of their life.

This is the strategy we are looking at so spouse will have higher payments if I go first.

One thing to keep in mind is that I think the surviving spouse payment will be based on the non-surviving spouse benefit at full retirement age (67-68) not maximum benefit at 70. 99% sure on this.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When the lower earning spouse claims SS impacts what % of the higher earning spouse they get as a spousal benefit (and maybe as a widowers benefit as well - not sure on that). If lower earning spouse claims before FRA they get a lower % of the higher earners benefit . My wife will claim SS at FRA which will be about 5 mos before I will claim at 70. Once I claim she can then apply for a spousal benefit and get 50% (I think) of my much higher benefit.

I'm not saying that's the best approach for everyone, it's situation dependent and of course also depends on how long we live but in our situation and if we live into our 80's it's the right move.
northeastag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm 65 and don't need the money now, so I have been prepared to wait until 70 (I'm pretty healthy, both parents are in mid 90's and still going strong, and so I am hopeful for a long life expectancy). However, two things may change my mind.

1. SOMEONE CORRECT me if this is wrong, but I don't think the projected amount of benefit increases each year after you no longer are contributing earned income. Based on my annual statements, my projected benefit at 70 hasn't changed from what it was projected to be several years ago when I retired. Conversely, had I taken the benefit at 62, while the initial payout is lower, I would be getting an inflation adjustment every year. So when I reach 70, the payout difference between the two options is not nearly at large as I thought it was going to be (especially with inflation running somewhat hot).

2. Based on recent comments from even prominent GOP officials, there is likely to be means testing of SS at some point, so I might be better off just grabbing it now before they start cutting it back on high income individuals/couples

halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think your # 1 is incorrect. I do not think it matters if you are contributing or not your benefit increases the same if you delay your benefit. 8% increase for every year you delay benefits. Maybe there are unusual circumstances where this is not true but it's very much the exception rather than the rule .

If it didn't increase then the correct course would be to take it as soon as possible once you stop working so there would be no debate about when to take it for true retirees.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the projected at 70 won't show COLA increase estimate either so it will end up being higher as well
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrustTheAwesomeness said:

LMCane said:

anyone know how much additional income one has to make in dollars -

to push yourself into a higher tax bracket when first taking out social security payments?

Depending on age, there are earning limits to even get your SS.

https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/whileworking.html

If you go over, it gets complicated but essentially you just don't get SS for those months. Then eventually (I think when you hit full retirement age [67]), you get a SS bump as if you filed that many months later. I just listened to a podcast that indicated this stupid rule might go away. It costs the government money and they manage it like a government program, meaning badly and slowly.

Indeed. The SSA did not properly adjust my wife's social security (previously impacted by the GPO) after the Social Security Fairness Act. Called them, discussed, and they made a correction. But they made a mistake in their calculation and shorted her like $7,000. Filed an appeal/request for consideration In the information we supplied them, we sent them the IRS rules and instructions the SSA provides to their employees regarding the issue at hand. Highlighted the pertinent parts. One example in their rules/instructions was EXACTLY our fact situation.

On her SSA page, it shows that they got the request for an appeal on July 7th and began working on it. Says it normally takes 30 days. It has been over 10 months. I happened to check today, now it states they got it on September 2nd, lol.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.