I draw the line at panda sitting on toilet.
quote:WTF!?!
This listing includes person in panda suit in almost every picture. Spring, TX.
http://www.har.com/22427-high-point-pines-dr/sale_77126430
quote:I don't want to know what's under the bed! I bet with a blacklight that place lights up like a crime scene.
is that a sleep apnea machine under the bed?
quote:
Frio - we are looking in that area. I saw your listing on HAR and it looks from the pics that there isn't a garage - there's the driveway that dead ends in the front yard. That would be a deal breaker for me (esp at that price point). Lots of buyers like me, for better or worse, make a decision on pics and don't read all the details. It also makes me question "what's going on with the garage if they didn't show it?"
The house looks lovely though.
Consider adding some descriptions - it's hard to "see" the flow of the rooms and what's on what floor.
I think you're going to have a tough time at that price point so close to the corner of White Oak and that business.
quote:It depends on how they're done and which room you're shooting. A lot of interior shots should be at waist level, but they're executed poorly. Kitchens need to be higher (you need to see over the island and you never want to see underside the upper cabinets), but living rooms and bedrooms look better from a little lower. It doesn't necessarily need to be waist level, but a lower angle helps put the viewer "in" the room rather than looking down on it.
What is the deal with waist level photographs? They look horrible.
quote:No, just in general. I see kitchen shots so low that the countertops aren't visible. That seems way too low to me.
EDIT: and if you're specifically talking about the house at 1645 Kipling, I agree that a lot of those are too low. I hadn't clicked on the link before I posted.
quote:I can't tell if it was recently renovated by people who lived there or someone trying to flip, but the finishes used in most areas just aren't working for me. Especially the bathrooms, it doesn't look very functional at all.
Behold..."Chateau Kipper." Speaking of descriptions...these are awful... Give me a break with trying to make this home a "chateau" with fancy names for every small room. And I shouldn't have to click back and forth to figure out what's where... I hate it when there is no logical flow to the pictures.
http://www.har.com/1645-kipling-st/sale_43841954
quote:Yeah, that's bad. The kitchen should be higher than that. The underside of the upper cabinets is a good rule of thumb. That usually gives you plenty of room for the countertops.quote:No, just in general. I see kitchen shots so low that the countertops aren't visible. That seems way too low to me.
EDIT: and if you're specifically talking about the house at 1645 Kipling, I agree that a lot of those are too low. I hadn't clicked on the link before I posted.
quote:If you still question the need to spend money on a professional photographer it does not get any clearer than this.
This is as low as I'll go on a kitchen:
And here's the realtor's photo before the reshoot. The height is fine, but the lines are crooked:
quote:that's not what your mom said [/inappropriate derail]
This is as low as I'll go on a kitchen
quote:
On Contracts please have the Seller as "The United States of America"