Uh oh TBAT

8,891 Views | 181 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Skubalon
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of butt-puckering up on the Plains. Ouch.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
BohunkAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cody Campbell will probably post a series of angry tweets about it. Watch out!
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raiderjay said:

would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....


Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
carl spacklers hat said:

Raiderjay said:

would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....


Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.

It says a lot about how good the rest of our team is......Hammond showed he could play last year and is much more mobile than Morton was....Better RBs, Better OL, Top TE coming back, D will be as good across the board as last year.....

David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Raiderjay said:

would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....


Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.

It says a lot about how good the rest of our team is......Hammond showed he could play last year and is much more mobile than Morton was....Better RBs, Better OL, Top TE coming back, D will be as good across the board as last year.....




Tech spent what, $4 million on this guy? You don't spend that kind of money on 1 player if you believe your 2nd option at QB can win in the playoffs. Tech has a good team for B12 standards no doubt, but Oregon exposed both Tech and how terrible the competition was that they played on a weekly basis.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Tech might lose to Houston in September, in Lubbock, or at least I'm thinking about it. will let you know. You might end up losing 3 games on an even weaker schedule than last year. I hope your RBs are healthy. If they are all going strong, you have an offense.

the laughing and signage from Cincinnati when you go there in Oct will be great fun.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

Raiderjay said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Raiderjay said:

would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....


Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.

It says a lot about how good the rest of our team is......Hammond showed he could play last year and is much more mobile than Morton was....Better RBs, Better OL, Top TE coming back, D will be as good across the board as last year.....




Tech spent what, $4 million on this guy? You don't spend that kind of money on 1 player if you believe your 2nd option at QB can win in the playoffs. Tech has a good team for B12 standards no doubt, but Oregon exposed both Tech and how terrible the competition was that they played on a weekly basis.

Tech spent the money on Sorsby as they were not sure how Hammond would recover form his torn ACL. His recovery now is ahead of schedule, even though he will probably not play the first 3 games but early on there was question he would be back at all for the season.

Oregon exposed our average QB, which was the weak link in last years team. Sorsby would have been option A but Hammond is a solid option B.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"think Tech might lose to Houston in September, in Lubbock, or at least I'm thinking about it"

at night, in Lubbock.....I don't think so but thanks for thinking about it......
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raiderjay said:

David_Puddy said:

Raiderjay said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Raiderjay said:

would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....


Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.

It says a lot about how good the rest of our team is......Hammond showed he could play last year and is much more mobile than Morton was....Better RBs, Better OL, Top TE coming back, D will be as good across the board as last year.....




Tech spent what, $4 million on this guy? You don't spend that kind of money on 1 player if you believe your 2nd option at QB can win in the playoffs. Tech has a good team for B12 standards no doubt, but Oregon exposed both Tech and how terrible the competition was that they played on a weekly basis.

Tech spent the money on Sorsby as they were not sure how Hammond would recover form his torn ACL. His recovery now is ahead of schedule, even though he will probably not play the first 3 games but early on there was question he would be back at all for the season.

Oregon exposed our average QB, which was the weak link in last years team. Sorsby would have been option A but Hammond is a solid option B.


Hammond put up great numbers w the Hutto Highschool Hippos. didn't win much though. So he does seem to be in that Sorsby zone.
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oregon exposed more than your weak QB. He didn't give up 23 points to Oregon's offense. The problem Tceh has is the same thing every Big XII team faces every time they make the playoffs - over-inflated opinion of how good you are because you beat up on midgets every week. Then the playoffs come and the Big XII rep is just the tallest midget.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Skubalon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He shouldn't take another snap of college football anywhere.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

David_Puddy said:

Raiderjay said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Raiderjay said:

would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....


Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.

It says a lot about how good the rest of our team is......Hammond showed he could play last year and is much more mobile than Morton was....Better RBs, Better OL, Top TE coming back, D will be as good across the board as last year.....




Tech spent what, $4 million on this guy? You don't spend that kind of money on 1 player if you believe your 2nd option at QB can win in the playoffs. Tech has a good team for B12 standards no doubt, but Oregon exposed both Tech and how terrible the competition was that they played on a weekly basis.

Tech spent the money on Sorsby as they were not sure how Hammond would recover form his torn ACL. His recovery now is ahead of schedule, even though he will probably not play the first 3 games but early on there was question he would be back at all for the season.

Oregon exposed our average QB, which was the weak link in last years team. Sorsby would have been option A but Hammond is a solid option B.



Soooo TBAT is relying on a guy at the most important position in the field coming off of an ACL surgery? Sounds like they're headed into this season with the same major issue as the last one. Minus the guys who were just drafted highly from your defense
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great job getting this guy Tech

BohunkAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He kind of fits in with the culture.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes your qbs are of the upmost character….

JFF says hold my beer….
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ags did great w JFF. forever a legend. Tech stupidly crapped the bed w Sorsby. Tech wants to hide it by ginning up a nothingbuger in the media. damage control. not owning their mistakes. it is a contrast of cultures.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

Yes your qbs are of the upmost character….

JFF says hold my beer….


JFF hasn't been our QB for 12 years. Got anything else?
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When did JFF place 100's of bets on his own team and get others to place bets for him. I 'll wait- and you can hold your own wine cooler.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorsby granted an injunction and can play this season. Will have to sit out the first two games….

Bring on the hate….
BohunkAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

Sorsby granted an injunction and can play this season. Will have to sit out the first two games….

Bring on the hate….

I don't think y'all are prepared for what y'all are doing here. Sh-t like this is going to end up being the ultimate backfire for Texas Tech and programs like it.
nu awlins ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BohunkAg said:

Raiderjay said:

Sorsby granted an injunction and can play this season. Will have to sit out the first two games….

Bring on the hate….

I don't think y'all are prepared for what y'all are doing here. Sh-t like this is going to end up being the ultimate backfire for Texas Tech and programs like it.


Don't worry. Cody has enough money to buy thousands of crayons and big chief tablets to help prepare them for what comes their way.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess this is good news. from a reality check standpoint, for fans. and for players who want to place bets on their own games.

wreck'em Tech
nu awlins ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Someone needs to ask sorsby to bet on whether he sees the field this season. I bet he takes the bait.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No hate, but it is a horrible look for college football- and college sports in general. Betting on the sport you play in and on the team you play on where you can impact the game is not good. He knew the rules and made a conscious decision to violate them- hundreds of times,

But then tt knew this and signed him anyway.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Angry Jonathan Zaludek
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Texas Tech is banished from the Big-12 where will they land? They no longer have Bob Bullock to threaten withholding state funding to schools for not including Tech at the big kid's table.
nu awlins ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Angry Jonathan Zaludek said:

If Texas Tech is banished from the Big-12 where will they land? They no longer have Bob Bullock to threaten withholding state funding to schools for not including Tech at the big kid's table.
.

Border Conference baby!!!!
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the type of thing that would be socially tough on Tech graduates in the real world of business and commerce and job interviewing, and cause peers to take them less seriously. glorified JC. diploma mill.

But not so much in the world of pizza. Is it hot? Did it arrive in 30 min or less?

Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGBQ76 said:

No hate, but it is a horrible look for college football- and college sports in general. Betting on the sport you play in and on the team you play on where you can impact the game is not good. He knew the rules and made a conscious decision to violate them- hundreds of times,

But then tt knew this and signed him anyway.



Tech did not know about this when they signed him. NCAA ruled, tech would have abided by that. A judge ruled an injunction that he can now play is Tech supposed to not let him play?


Tech didn't do anything wrong here. He did do something wrong and honestly if the ruling would have been no injunction and he can't play I would be fine with that.

But the judge did rule the injunction, he has gone to rehab and is getting help, and now he can play. Tech should support the kid but also have a "no tolerance" policy that if he places even 1 bet at Tech he is out
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cincinnati knew about and allegedly made it known. Surely tt-ers are smarter than that.
Having dealt with a son who was a drug addict, getting help is one step, removing yourself from people and situations that can lead to more issues is even more important. If you really cared about him, you would not enable him. Just my opinion.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ICinci did not make it a public known issue until he decided to go to Tech
nu awlins ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

ICinci did not make it a public known issue until he decided to go to


Ok Cody.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doesn't matter when, they did make it public. So to say tt didn't know and did nothing wrong is pretty disingenuous.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.