David_Puddy said:
Raiderjay said:
carl spacklers hat said:
Raiderjay said:
would have been good to have him, but Tech will still win without him.....
Which says a lot about how weak your schedule is.
It says a lot about how good the rest of our team is......Hammond showed he could play last year and is much more mobile than Morton was....Better RBs, Better OL, Top TE coming back, D will be as good across the board as last year.....
Tech spent what, $4 million on this guy? You don't spend that kind of money on 1 player if you believe your 2nd option at QB can win in the playoffs. Tech has a good team for B12 standards no doubt, but Oregon exposed both Tech and how terrible the competition was that they played on a weekly basis.
Tech spent the money on Sorsby as they were not sure how Hammond would recover form his torn ACL. His recovery now is ahead of schedule, even though he will probably not play the first 3 games but early on there was question he would be back at all for the season.
Oregon exposed our average QB, which was the weak link in last years team. Sorsby would have been option A but Hammond is a solid option B.