3
Ervin Burrell said:
4. Not sure why so many are confident in a 3 but would love to be wrong.
OKC~Ag said:
our resident expert says 3...so 3
Heineken-Ashi said:
5. This will be the year they give relevance to the conference tourney when considering us. They will also pull out the no longer used metric of "last 10 games".
Until proven otherwise, it is assumed the committee will give us the worst possible outcome.
Don't forget how ridiculous our seeding was last year. We had no business being that low. None. It didn't make sense. I predict we will get something similar, and not in our favor. Hope I'm wrong.
bingram1230 said:
Most likely a 4 is my guess and we will play a team like Yale, Grand Canyon, or High Point and be in an absolute dog fight round 1
swc93 said:
4 and matched up a with team that rains threes.
Do Yale rain 3s?swc93 said:swc93 said:
4 and matched up a with team that rains threes.
whelp
SigAg6 said:Do Yale rain 3s?swc93 said:swc93 said:
4 and matched up a with team that rains threes.
whelp
Ervin Burrell said:
Being in Auburn's region means we were the worse rated 4, correct? Again, not sure why everyone thought a 3 was a cinch.