UMichAg,
I agree on a 1 time deal but perception becomes reality. The current SEC deal is valuable BECAUSE they are winning. In the grand scheme every SEC loss knocks them down the revenue ladder and every win pushes them upLook how far the ACC has fallen in the last 20 years in TV revenue. They once set the bar and now they struggle to stay ahead of the Big East for revenue. The ACC footprint and demographics have grown in this time span so it is safe to say that not winning is what has moved their TV dollars from the top to the bottom.
I like Michigan, and I love when they beat Ohio State, but I can not root for them to beat a SEC team. I still think that Bama vs Michigan bowl game that went to OT should have been the MNC game that year but that was not helping Bama and the SEC's stock value when they lost. Football is a zero sum game and the vast majority of the national TV audience only remembers the winners. Does the SEC really want the ACC's deal that has fallen with their losses?
ACC MNC's in the ESPN era
Clemson - 1981
Miami - 1983, 1987, 1989, 1991, and 2001
Georgia Tech - 1990
Florida State - 1993 and 1999
Sure the SEC is hot now, but they need to maintain it to keep the media money turned on lest they become the next ACC.
I agree on a 1 time deal but perception becomes reality. The current SEC deal is valuable BECAUSE they are winning. In the grand scheme every SEC loss knocks them down the revenue ladder and every win pushes them upLook how far the ACC has fallen in the last 20 years in TV revenue. They once set the bar and now they struggle to stay ahead of the Big East for revenue. The ACC footprint and demographics have grown in this time span so it is safe to say that not winning is what has moved their TV dollars from the top to the bottom.
I like Michigan, and I love when they beat Ohio State, but I can not root for them to beat a SEC team. I still think that Bama vs Michigan bowl game that went to OT should have been the MNC game that year but that was not helping Bama and the SEC's stock value when they lost. Football is a zero sum game and the vast majority of the national TV audience only remembers the winners. Does the SEC really want the ACC's deal that has fallen with their losses?
ACC MNC's in the ESPN era
Clemson - 1981
Miami - 1983, 1987, 1989, 1991, and 2001
Georgia Tech - 1990
Florida State - 1993 and 1999
Sure the SEC is hot now, but they need to maintain it to keep the media money turned on lest they become the next ACC.

