I'd try Patton as an Aschenbeck type Role

1,548 Views | 24 Replies | Last: 20 hrs ago by Killzone3abc
85AustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Patton has 16 K's and 1 walk. Move him to stopper, closer, middle relief, the Aschenbeck swiss army knife of the past couple of years. That way you can get his help in multiple games instead of just the 1 he has been starting. I'd argue it would help you take 2 out of 3 games on a weekend, rather than to try and keep together 3 quality starters with a shaky bullpen.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then who moves into the third weekend starter role?
Capstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of situation.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't hate the idea but the OP only gave us half of the equation. The fact we've only played one midweek has given us no insight who could possibly take over as the third starter.
85AustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jkag89 said:

Then who moves into the third weekend starter role?
Well Freshcorn's got good stuff and I believe he started at McLennan. You could try Freshcorn, Moss, Morton. It would be more of an all hands on deck approach. Pick the guy that does a good job of starting and then piece it together from there.

If you end up with 3 quality starters but your bullpen can't finish a game then the quality starts don't mean much. You have to figure out how to close a game out.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you don't find a solid enough third starter you have to go even deeper into what so far has been a shaky pen. Tough to save a game if it is already out of hand (see Tuesday). I'd be far more inclined to go with your idea if the bats were producing consistently. The piecemeal approach to pitching with excellent bats did work for us in '22.
AggieCrew44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kinda thought about this the other day. Think of the Sims kid keep showing you stuff on Tuesday you consider it later in the season. Especially in postseasons when you really only need 3 starters anyway

Freshcorn has really good stuff with that sinker/slider mix, but it lives off movement so I'm not sure the swing and miss stuff is necessarily there at the level you want from a closer like we see with Stewart. That tends to play better as a starter than a closer
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd rather we figure out and shore up the defense to preserve leads than lose a starter to a reliever role.

We really need Sorrell back in left (or leave Kash there) and the infield needs to gel. There needs to be much better communication among them.
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
trouble said:

I'd rather we figure out and shore up the defense to preserve leads than lose a starter to a reliever role.

We really need Sorrell back in left (or leave Kash there) and the infield needs to gel. There needs to be much better communication among them.


I wish we could find a way to move Kash to first. I think it would help immensely.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jkag89 said:

Then who moves into the third weekend starter role?


Cunningham?
C/O 2013 - Company E2
Gunner33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cunningham would be my pick.
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

jkag89 said:

Then who moves into the third weekend starter role?


Cunningham?


I can't remember, did he start at Washington?
trouble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's what I'm hoping for once Sorrell is back. George can't play left though. He was absolutely lost out there last night.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Pony 07 said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

jkag89 said:

Then who moves into the third weekend starter role?


Cunningham?


I can't remember, did he start at Washington?


2024 he was their Ashenbeck (primary closer), according to their Stats
C/O 2013 - Company E2
Chrundle the Great
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Baseball ref says 3 times out of 41 appearances.
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
trouble said:

That's what I'm hoping for once Sorrell is back. George can't play left though. He was absolutely lost out there last night.


For sure he was lost. And it would be worse at Olsen with the unpredictable winds.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Won't be popular, but Wilson can repeat his performance from last night would give him a shot in closing duty.
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StinkyPinky said:

Won't be popular, but Wilson can repeat his performance from last night would give him a shot in closing duty.


If he can build off the momentum from that performance, then I think this could be a possibility.
Gunner33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wouldn't mind Wilson.... or Rudis right now.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gunner33 said:

I wouldn't mind Wilson.... or Rudis right now.
Rudis would be an excellent t option as well, but Rudis could carry more innings consistently so would like to see him in long relief.
stoneca
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really wish we had Sdao right now…
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
stoneca said:

Really wish we had Sdao right now…


And Stewie and Wansing
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My son and I had this conversation last night
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Patton didn't come to Texas A&M to be a reliever.
Killzone3abc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He came to be a part of the team and the team demands may not be a sunday starter. Not saying we should or shouldn't move him, but team needs are more important. Kash didn't come here to play 1B, but I bet he'll end up there if he's on the field when Sorrell returns.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.