From my experience anecdotally I don't know. So far no deaths at my hospital with the cocktail. Time will tell.
I can't recall if you've mentioned, but any deaths for patients who didn't have the cocktail?Marcus Aurelius said:
From my experience anecdotally I don't know. So far no deaths at my hospital with the cocktail. Time will tell.
Marcus Aurelius said:
From my experience anecdotally I don't know. So far no deaths at my hospital with the cocktail. Time will tell.
Same guy as before with the 36 patient study?74Ag1 said:
French Dr Didier Raoult has new study with larger group of 80 patients coming out soon.
74Ag1 said:
French Dr Didier Raoult has new study with larger group of 80 patients coming out soon.
Marcus Aurelius said:
No deaths at all at our hospital. Yet. ID is anti aziithromycin because of QT concerns. I think this is BS. I have Rx'd a ton of azithro in my career and never have seen QT issues.
Quote:
In conclusion, we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.
Rapier108 said:
Here is the paper out of France that was mentioned a few posts above about another trial of hydroxchloroquine and Azithromycin on 80 patients. At least I assume it is that paper since it involves 80 people.
Of the 80 patients 78 improved, 1 died (86 years old) and 1 (74 years old) is still in intensive care.
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-IHU-2-1.pdf
I'll leave it to our resident docs to read all the medicalese in the paper.
Quote:
By administering hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin, we were able to observe an improvement in all cases, except in one patient who arrived with an advanced form, who was over the age of 86, and in whom the evolution was irreversible.
aggie-beta said:74Ag1 said:
French Dr Didier Raoult has new study with larger group of 80 patients coming out soon.
I think I saw Dr Oz mention this on Fox News. He said that 79 out of 80 patients survived but said these people were already hospitalized to begin with so those numbers are good. I hope someone from here reads it and gives their take.
Yes. All on zinc as well.Palovic said:
Marcus-just for baseline knowledge, does your groups cocktail include zinc sulfate?
No deaths in total yet. But we've not been inundated yet. It's coming. I predict Easter is COVID-19 peak in US.Mordred said:I can't recall if you've mentioned, but any deaths for patients who didn't have the cocktail?Marcus Aurelius said:
From my experience anecdotally I don't know. So far no deaths at my hospital with the cocktail. Time will tell.
Not sure you need "military retooling". Everyone in the industry is doing whatever they can to beat this. The company I work for is gearing up one of our contract pharma production facilities in the US for making remdesivir.Marcus Aurelius said:
It's on shelves. It will diminish. Why I pray Trump orders military re-tooling of big Pharma to make hydrochloroquine and redesimivir.
In 20+ years I have seen one and the patient was on Sotalol.PikesPeakAg said:
I cannot absolutely say never but I cannot recall a single episode in 20+ years. I am not EP however, they might be a better sub-specialist to ask, as they would preferentially see more in referral if it does occur.
Palovic said:
I posted this comment on another forum a few weeks ago but I will restate it here as most medical and science personnel already know this, the debate about whether HCQ is effective with AZI and zinc is still ongoing, but the point is moot if we cannot effectively test and prescribe the said treatment early on in the infection to drastically reduce early inflammation in the lungs that have patients coming to ER needing vents day 1.
My belief (full disclaimer) is that the cocktail Dr. Marcus is referring to will prove to be an effective cocktail (not 100%) through the widespread studies that are ongoing. An anti-viral treatment is much more important than the vaccine in my opinion as it will be more than likely that this strain will change season to season and you will get about the same protection as you get with the flu on any vaccine. (Please note that I have no more evidence other than hearing many other medical professionals saying the same thing with no evidence)
Diagnosis and timing of treatment is everything here.
The genetic data suggest the opposite. Genetic sequencing shows about 2 mutations per month in CoV2 which is similar for influenza, but CoV2 has a genome of twice the size, meaning the mutation rate is lower.Palovic said:
I posted this comment on another forum a few weeks ago but I will restate it here as most medical and science personnel already know this, the debate about whether HCQ is effective with AZI and zinc is still ongoing, but the point is moot if we cannot effectively test and prescribe the said treatment early on in the infection to drastically reduce early inflammation in the lungs that have patients coming to ER needing vents day 1.
My belief (full disclaimer) is that the cocktail Dr. Marcus is referring to will prove to be an effective cocktail (not 100%) through the widespread studies that are ongoing. An anti-viral treatment is much more important than the vaccine in my opinion as it will be more than likely that this strain will change season to season and you will get about the same protection as you get with the flu on any vaccine. (Please note that I have no more evidence other than hearing many other medical professionals saying the same thing with no evidence)
Diagnosis and timing of treatment is everything here.
BiochemAg97 said:The genetic data suggest the opposite. Genetic sequencing shows about 2 mutations per month in CoV2 which is similar for influenza, but CoV2 has a genome of twice the size, meaning the mutation rate is lower.Palovic said:
I posted this comment on another forum a few weeks ago but I will restate it here as most medical and science personnel already know this, the debate about whether HCQ is effective with AZI and zinc is still ongoing, but the point is moot if we cannot effectively test and prescribe the said treatment early on in the infection to drastically reduce early inflammation in the lungs that have patients coming to ER needing vents day 1.
My belief (full disclaimer) is that the cocktail Dr. Marcus is referring to will prove to be an effective cocktail (not 100%) through the widespread studies that are ongoing. An anti-viral treatment is much more important than the vaccine in my opinion as it will be more than likely that this strain will change season to season and you will get about the same protection as you get with the flu on any vaccine. (Please note that I have no more evidence other than hearing many other medical professionals saying the same thing with no evidence)
Diagnosis and timing of treatment is everything here.
Additionally, only some portions of the genetic sequence are relevant to immunity, as only a few proteins are on the outside, particularly spike (s) and nucleocapsid (n) proteins. SAR-CoV derived B and T cells recognize epitopes of the s and n proteins that are thus far highly conserved in CoV2, with no changes to these regions observed in all 120 sequenced CoV2 genomes. Also, SARS-CoV derived mouse polyclonal antibodies are effective at binding to SARS-CoV2 s protein.
As a CoV and CoV2 are both bat viruses, the similarities may not surprising. But CoV jumped from animals in 2003 and CoV2 jumped nearly 20 years later, meaning the two diverged at least that long ago and we have a minimum of 17 years of accumulated mutations without significant changes to these immune recognized epitopes, which suggest a lot of genetic stability.
That is all good news for a vaccine, although depending on how long the immune response lasts in a person, it might require a booster periodically, maybe more like tetanus vaccine than flu vaccine.