Texan_Aggie said:
Yes, obviously if everyone stayed home and we contact traced effectively, this would be the best path forward from a lives perspective. But this approach has obvious costs, most notably the economy and people sustaining jobs.
This will come down to a cost benefit analysis. Yes, we will lose lives, but at what cost to the greater population are we willing to do so. It is morbid to say we are okay with more people dying so that others can work, but it likely will happen that way.
Except people's actions will change as well if the virus is prevalent in society. Thus it will have costs to the economy and people sustaining jobs. You can't just revert to Jan 2019 at this point.