Prexys Moon said:
So 60K people ass to nuts in a protest is OK, but some tiny bar out in West Texas isn't? Unbelievable.
Might want to look at the rate of infection in Brewster county. One of the worst in the nation.
Prexys Moon said:
So 60K people ass to nuts in a protest is OK, but some tiny bar out in West Texas isn't? Unbelievable.
Player To Be Named Later said:The herd immunity that science isn't even settled on being a real impact?texan12 said:
At what point do these measures delay herd immunity?
Proposition Joe said:OlSarge92 said:HotardAg07 said:
None of that is contradicting what I've pointed out. I have repeatedly said that we are at "normal ICU capacity" and that surge capacity is available. I have posted what those numbers look like. I have also said that due to the rapid growing trend, we would be out of sustainable surge capacity in 12 days at this pace -- ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER, not the media, not a politician..
"Stop moving the goal posts. You are claiming that this is a media driven hoax. I have gone way out of my way to post not just hospital data but actual ER doctor's quotes to show the contrary and you have ignored it all. This is not a media driven hoax."
I just gave you quotes showing my claim regarding the media has merit.
You do understand all that you did is post your own media source and assumed that there's no way it could be a media driven hoax?
SirLurksALot said:Player To Be Named Later said:The herd immunity that science isn't even settled on being a real impact?texan12 said:
At what point do these measures delay herd immunity?
If herd immunity isn't going to be a thing then that's even more of a reason to return to normal now. We can't stay in a state of perpetual lockdowns until a vaccine comes sometime in December or next year, if there even is a vaccine at all. There's no guarantee that these lockdowns are going to save lives in the long run. They are simply destroying livelihoods.
People need to accept that covid is a part of life like every other disease. The reality is that you're probably going to catch it and that you're overwhelming likely to recover from it. Unfortunately it's probably going to be awhile before the rest of society realizes this. We will have caused so much self inflected pain by then and will have no real positive results to show for it.
Those ICUs are full of people that got put off from the last lockdown, which was apparently unnecessary (or at least too early). Houston hospitals are already pushing back in effect saying we have other really sick people we can't put off right now. The first lockdown created this situation.culdeus said:
So the goalpost move today is the makeup of the ICU is not covidey enough?
ElephantRider said:SirLurksALot said:Player To Be Named Later said:The herd immunity that science isn't even settled on being a real impact?texan12 said:
At what point do these measures delay herd immunity?
If herd immunity isn't going to be a thing then that's even more of a reason to return to normal now. We can't stay in a state of perpetual lockdowns until a vaccine comes sometime in December or next year, if there even is a vaccine at all. There's no guarantee that these lockdowns are going to save lives in the long run. They are simply destroying livelihoods.
People need to accept that covid is a part of life like every other disease. The reality is that you're probably going to catch it and that you're overwhelming likely to recover from it. Unfortunately it's probably going to be awhile before the rest of society realizes this. We will have caused so much self inflected pain by then and will have no real positive results to show for it.
My question is, why can't we live our lives while also taking precautions? If we do what we can to limit the spread, there won't be any need for lockdowns. People won't budge on that at all, and I just don't understand.
OlSarge92 said:Proposition Joe said:OlSarge92 said:HotardAg07 said:
None of that is contradicting what I've pointed out. I have repeatedly said that we are at "normal ICU capacity" and that surge capacity is available. I have posted what those numbers look like. I have also said that due to the rapid growing trend, we would be out of sustainable surge capacity in 12 days at this pace -- ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER, not the media, not a politician..
"Stop moving the goal posts. You are claiming that this is a media driven hoax. I have gone way out of my way to post not just hospital data but actual ER doctor's quotes to show the contrary and you have ignored it all. This is not a media driven hoax."
I just gave you quotes showing my claim regarding the media has merit.
You do understand all that you did is post your own media source and assumed that there's no way it could be a media driven hoax?
You are telling me the quotes from real people are BS and a hoax?
70-80% is normal, but that's not where we're at today. We surpassed 100% of normal ICU capacity yesterday in the TMC. And they do put out tons of detailed data daily hereSoupNazi2001 said:Player To Be Named Later said:Perhaps he data and details isn't all that positive and he's trying to just institute these measures without going into the data that he has access to. It's possible the data that drove him to making these decisions just sucks and he's trying not to panic folks even further.OlSarge92 said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Yeah, this is ALL just because of the media.
Abbott just sat down, spent 30 minutes watching FOX, 30 minutes watching CNN, and 30 minutes reading Internet media and made his decision.
I'm sure he has zero input and real numbers coming his way from professionals that aren't in the media.
Are you saying the Houston Hospital Exec are wrong? Because clearly Abbott didn't listen to them, and instead shut down part of their business
If he has some special data, sure would be nice if he shared it instead of BS statements about 5K w/o details behind it.
There's likely way more that goes in to this than most of us consider. Pretty positive Abbott and Lt Dan don't want to tank businesses any more than they absolutely have to.
Do you really think that when the CEOs of all the major hospitals said there were no capacity issues. Maybe it's on them for not providing more detailed data to the Governor and the public but they basically stated that it is normal for their ICUs to run at 70% to 80% capacity and 70% of the ICU patients were non COVID patients. If I were them I would start putting out detailed data daily.
I'm not sure we're getting the truth from CEO Marc Boom or the other CEO's. I think he(Boom) changed his tone because he and the other CEO's don't want elected surgeries suspended. Elected surgeries are big money makers for hospitals. This was an email he sent to employees of Friday.SoupNazi2001 said:Player To Be Named Later said:Perhaps he data and details isn't all that positive and he's trying to just institute these measures without going into the data that he has access to. It's possible the data that drove him to making these decisions just sucks and he's trying not to panic folks even further.OlSarge92 said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Yeah, this is ALL just because of the media.
Abbott just sat down, spent 30 minutes watching FOX, 30 minutes watching CNN, and 30 minutes reading Internet media and made his decision.
I'm sure he has zero input and real numbers coming his way from professionals that aren't in the media.
Are you saying the Houston Hospital Exec are wrong? Because clearly Abbott didn't listen to them, and instead shut down part of their business
If he has some special data, sure would be nice if he shared it instead of BS statements about 5K w/o details behind it.
There's likely way more that goes in to this than most of us consider. Pretty positive Abbott and Lt Dan don't want to tank businesses any more than they absolutely have to.
Do you really think that when the CEOs of all the major hospitals said there were no capacity issues. Maybe it's on them for not providing more detailed data to the Governor and the public but they basically stated that it is normal for their ICUs to run at 70% to 80% capacity and 70% of the ICU patients were non COVID patients. If I were them I would start putting out detailed data daily.
Is that a yes?agforlife97 said:Those ICUs are full of people that got put off from the last lockdown, which was apparently unnecessary (or at least too early). Houston hospitals are already pushing back in effect saying we have other really sick people we can't put off right now. The first lockdown created this situation.culdeus said:
So the goalpost move today is the makeup of the ICU is not covidey enough?
The order allows for hospital discretion regarding elective procedures with this statement:OlSarge92 said:HotardAg07 said:
The hospital executives did not contradict Abbott when they said there was capacity. In Houston, "normal ICU capacity" has been met at 100%. They have excess "sustainable surge capacity" that can be used now. However, at the current growth of hospitalizations in Houston, that sustainable surge capacity will be exceeded in 12 days according to the TMC. Therefore, they are making action to try to avoid that scenario. Hospital executives are trying to project confidence in the medical systems and to not scare people away, but they are also the ones who signed the letter warning people that this is getting worse and that they should take precautions.
You are ignoring every single bit of evidence that does not align with your pre-conceived beliefs.
Did the hospital execs tell Abbott to shut down elective surgery? Are you saying they can't manage themselves in the face of their data?
All those preparations were done. There are nearly 1000 extra ICU beds in the TMC now available and the temp stuff is being reconstructed at NRG.jckrjr7 said:
The part that frustrates me is we had 3 months to put a plan in place if ICU occupancy began increasing. What were Texas hospitals doing during this time other than furloughing their elective surgery staff?
eidetic78 said:The order allows for hospital discretion regarding elective procedures with this statement:OlSarge92 said:HotardAg07 said:
The hospital executives did not contradict Abbott when they said there was capacity. In Houston, "normal ICU capacity" has been met at 100%. They have excess "sustainable surge capacity" that can be used now. However, at the current growth of hospitalizations in Houston, that sustainable surge capacity will be exceeded in 12 days according to the TMC. Therefore, they are making action to try to avoid that scenario. Hospital executives are trying to project confidence in the medical systems and to not scare people away, but they are also the ones who signed the letter warning people that this is getting worse and that they should take precautions.
You are ignoring every single bit of evidence that does not align with your pre-conceived beliefs.
Did the hospital execs tell Abbott to shut down elective surgery? Are you saying they can't manage themselves in the face of their data?
"....this prohibition shall not apply to any surgery or procedure that, if performed in accordance with the commonly accepted standard of clinical practice, would not deplete any hospital capacity needed to cope with the COVID-19 disaster."
So, yes, they can manage themselves, and that's what they're being allowed to do. Where did you get your information that said otherwise?
agforlife97 said:Those ICUs are full of people that got put off from the last lockdown, which was apparently unnecessary (or at least too early). Houston hospitals are already pushing back in effect saying we have other really sick people we can't put off right now. The first lockdown created this situation.culdeus said:
So the goalpost move today is the makeup of the ICU is not covidey enough?
Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
OlSarge92 said:
I said the media is driving a frenzy, I said nothing about his data, or people he referenced. I was told this wasn't a media driven frenzy/hoax, and I showed two quotes lending merit to my claim.
PJYoung said:OlSarge92 said:
I said the media is driving a frenzy, I said nothing about his data, or people he referenced. I was told this wasn't a media driven frenzy/hoax, and I showed two quotes lending merit to my claim.
And he told you the media has nothing to do with what he thinks because he doesn't watch it. He is getting his information from the doctors and hospitals.
How can you even still use the word hoax? Amazing.
I have 20yrs of life experience seeing just how society behaves. I'll call it how I see it.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
Terms like "general ignorance" and "selfishness" used by you throughout this thread are as much a part of the problem as anything. Maybe stop judging others and focus on what YOU can do and you are comfortable doing.
Player To Be Named Later said:I have 20yrs of life experience seeing just how society behaves. I'll call it how I see it.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
Terms like "general ignorance" and "selfishness" used by you throughout this thread are as much a part of the problem as anything. Maybe stop judging others and focus on what YOU can do and you are comfortable doing.
Player To Be Named Later said:
Yeah, for the most part I'm really finding myself not caring near as much. We live out in the country with our nearest neighbors over 200yds away on each side. So for our part, we can just do what we do.
I guess I should just reflect on why I care or don't care if the cities go to hell or not.
From a selfish standpoint, I suppose it would actually benefit us out here if the cities run into this thing stubbornly, max out hospitals on the way to their "herd immunity".
SirLurksALot said:Player To Be Named Later said:I have 20yrs of life experience seeing just how society behaves. I'll call it how I see it.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
Terms like "general ignorance" and "selfishness" used by you throughout this thread are as much a part of the problem as anything. Maybe stop judging others and focus on what YOU can do and you are comfortable doing.
Then you must realize that expecting everyone to follow the recommendations is a fool's errand.
PlanoAg98 said:
Social distancing on the Guadalupe.
Player To Be Named Later said:I have 20yrs of life experience seeing just how society behaves. I'll call it how I see it.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
Terms like "general ignorance" and "selfishness" used by you throughout this thread are as much a part of the problem as anything. Maybe stop judging others and focus on what YOU can do and you are comfortable doing.
Sometimes I feel that way..... and then my knees and back remind me that's not even remotely correct.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:I have 20yrs of life experience seeing just how society behaves. I'll call it how I see it.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
Terms like "general ignorance" and "selfishness" used by you throughout this thread are as much a part of the problem as anything. Maybe stop judging others and focus on what YOU can do and you are comfortable doing.
You're 20 year old?!?!
Player To Be Named Later said:Sometimes I feel that way..... and then my knees and back remind me that's not even remotely correct.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:I have 20yrs of life experience seeing just how society behaves. I'll call it how I see it.Capitol Ag said:Player To Be Named Later said:
Eventually maybe people will decide when we open things up that you still need to behave intelligently. Given the general ignorance of most of our society, I'm less than hopeful.
Terms like "general ignorance" and "selfishness" used by you throughout this thread are as much a part of the problem as anything. Maybe stop judging others and focus on what YOU can do and you are comfortable doing.
You're 20 year old?!?!
eidetic78 said:All those preparations were done. There are nearly 1000 extra ICU beds in the TMC now available and the temp stuff is being reconstructed at NRG.jckrjr7 said:
The part that frustrates me is we had 3 months to put a plan in place if ICU occupancy began increasing. What were Texas hospitals doing during this time other than furloughing their elective surgery staff?
Where did you hear otherwise?
jckrjr7 said:eidetic78 said:All those preparations were done. There are nearly 1000 extra ICU beds in the TMC now available and the temp stuff is being reconstructed at NRG.jckrjr7 said:
The part that frustrates me is we had 3 months to put a plan in place if ICU occupancy began increasing. What were Texas hospitals doing during this time other than furloughing their elective surgery staff?
Where did you hear otherwise?
I live in Austin. I've heard of no such contingency plan here.
Player To Be Named Later said:The herd immunity that science isn't even settled on being a real impact?texan12 said:
At what point do these measures delay herd immunity?