I think there are underlying reasons why people are "picking them apart". I have a few friends who are absolutely loving working from home, and dread the day they are called back. And they also talk down the vaccine.hoosierAG said:
We have let perfect become the enemy of good. There is no 100% guarantee in anything in life. How did we get here as a society?
That we have these vaccines already (supply/distribution bugs notwithstanding) is a miracle. That all of them are so good and robust, as posts show above (and better than any flu vaccine) is even more amazing. But the picking them apart for whatever reason, and the media infatuation with doing so instead of promoting is killing it and bringing more despair.
We are our own worst enemy.
The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
I'd recommend you look up:nortex97 said:The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
I'd recommend you condescend a little less.The Big12Ag said:I'd recommend you look up:nortex97 said:The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
1) Definition of the word pandemic
2) History of respiratory pandemics over last 100-150 years
3) Average duration of those past pandemics
nortex97 said:I'd recommend you condescend a little less.The Big12Ag said:I'd recommend you look up:nortex97 said:The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
1) Definition of the word pandemic
2) History of respiratory pandemics over last 100-150 years
3) Average duration of those past pandemics
This board shouldn't be about tit for tat battles of links etc.
The China virus pandemic is and has been over, it is not a matter of debate now, regardless of your tone/emotions.
We can agree that the definition of a pandemic is not a matter up for debate regardless of personal opinions or desires to change the definition.nortex97 said:I'd recommend you condescend a little less.The Big12Ag said:I'd recommend you look up:nortex97 said:The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
1) Definition of the word pandemic
2) History of respiratory pandemics over last 100-150 years
3) Average duration of those past pandemics
This board shouldn't be about tit for tat battles of links etc.
The China virus pandemic is and has been over, it is not a matter of debate now, regardless of your tone/emotions.
Sure. It was not a global threat to the general human population as of this summer. It's never threatened, substantially, much of African and southern hemisphere populations (including India/China), and in general impacts only a limited subset of people in certain latitudes (without prior immunity and because it is a seasonal illness/virus as all coronaviruses are). It now and has been an endemic virus for some time in the northern hemisphere, and a threat there to at risk populations (elderly/immunocompromised without the vaccines) only at this time, really.AgsMyDude said:nortex97 said:I'd recommend you condescend a little less.The Big12Ag said:I'd recommend you look up:nortex97 said:The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
1) Definition of the word pandemic
2) History of respiratory pandemics over last 100-150 years
3) Average duration of those past pandemics
This board shouldn't be about tit for tat battles of links etc.
The China virus pandemic is and has been over, it is not a matter of debate now, regardless of your tone/emotions.
Would you mind expanding on exactly the criteria of a pandmic that covid no longer meets as of "early summer"?
Quote:
A pandemic refers to a global epidemic one that has spread over several countries or continents affecting a large number of people. Dr. Pritish Tosh adds, "In epidemiologic terms, an outbreak refers to a number of cases that exceeds what would be expected. A pandemic is when there is an outbreak that affects most of the world. We use the term endemic when there is an infection within a geographic location that is existing perpetually."
Although you said this shouldn't be a battle of links before later supplying three links in the post above, I still want to thank you for providing them. The links you shared showed how the H1N1 pandemic ran for 14 months despite having far few cases and deaths than Covid 19 and despite also not impacting every country in identical ways.nortex97 said:Sure. It was not a global threat to the general human population as of this summer. It's never threatened, substantially, much of African and southern hemisphere populations (including India/China), and in general impacts only a limited subset of people in certain latitudes (without prior immunity and because it is a seasonal illness/virus as all coronaviruses are). It now and has been an endemic virus for some time in the northern hemisphere, and a threat there to at risk populations (elderly/immunocompromised without the vaccines) only at this time, really.AgsMyDude said:nortex97 said:I'd recommend you condescend a little less.The Big12Ag said:I'd recommend you look up:nortex97 said:The only thing is that (a) the pandemic has been over since early summer by any ordinary metric previously used, and (b) the case-demic at present has led to folks who only will change policies like masks etc. once it has been completely eradicated.Dad said:
This J&J vaccine sounds awesome if they can produce and distribute it much faster. If everyone that wants a shot can get one then the pandemic is over once those shots are in full effect. The people that are able to get one at that point but don't want the vaccine would know the risks and live (or die) with the consequences if it doesn't work out.
1) Definition of the word pandemic
2) History of respiratory pandemics over last 100-150 years
3) Average duration of those past pandemics
This board shouldn't be about tit for tat battles of links etc.
The China virus pandemic is and has been over, it is not a matter of debate now, regardless of your tone/emotions.
Would you mind expanding on exactly the criteria of a pandmic that covid no longer meets as of "early summer"?Quote:
A pandemic refers to a global epidemic one that has spread over several countries or continents affecting a large number of people. Dr. Pritish Tosh adds, "In epidemiologic terms, an outbreak refers to a number of cases that exceeds what would be expected. A pandemic is when there is an outbreak that affects most of the world. We use the term endemic when there is an infection within a geographic location that is existing perpetually."
The case loads, and various metrics tracking it are wildly inaccurate now thanks to over use of PCR testing. Compare, just for example, to how H1N1 panic/definitions were handled and classified, or the spanish flu.
It's absolutely no longer a pandemic, globally,and hasn't been for some time (even if you want to pick on 'early summer'). I think there's a lot of regional/racial bigotry in the desire to define this as an ongoing global pandemic, frankly (not a personal accusation, obviously).
Because I understand statistics. India isn't even at 8K per million right now. It's relatively trivial given her population. Brazil is in flu season in much of the country but the rate there isn't what we had here at all, nor is it rising.JJMt said:How can you say that?Quote:
It's never threatened, substantially, much of African and southern hemisphere populations (including India/China),
India is #2 in the world right now in no. of positive cases, and Brazil is #3. Brazil is #2 in terms of total deaths and India is #4.
China we don't know because no one trusts the data out of China.
And my guess is that although India and Brazil aren't likely intentionally lying, their data gathering systems are probably suspect, and the numbers are likely worse than what they're reporting.