Pandemic over by April?

15,959 Views | 100 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by buffalo chip
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I really hope this guy is right.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/well-have-herd-immunity-by-april-11613669731
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think he's probably close to right. April might be too optimistic, and every optimistic prediction has been wrong so far. But it's absolutely the case that a significant percentage of the country has been infected. It's also the case that the professionals will be the last ones to say that it's over. But if cases and deaths go away, people will return to normal life.
Aggie95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Faucci said today, 2022 before any normalcy, so I'll go with May of 2021
Please tell me there's a special place in Heaven for Aggie fans! It's like we are living some sort of penance on Earth.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Faucci is a good scientist and a good person, but he should have stopped with the daily interviews a long long time ago. The science doesn't move on a 24 hour news cycle, but he's asked to give a new opinion on something every day. As a scientist when you don't know the answer you are supposed to hedge, and then throw something really vague and conservative out there. At this point that's less than helpful.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Depends on your attitude, some people have been out and about for months and some people have the vaccine but feel more comfortable staying in personal quarantine until the government says its over.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like the media might be catching on:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/19/briefing/ted-cruz-texas-water-iran-nuclear.html
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie95 said:

Faucci said today, 2022 before any normalcy, so I'll go with May of 2021


He's moved this date around so much now, it's hard to take him seriously anymore.
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amercer said:

I think Faucci is a good scientist and a good person, but he should have stopped with the daily interviews a long long time ago. The science doesn't move on a 24 hour news cycle, but he's asked to give a new opinion on something every day. As a scientist when you don't know the answer you are supposed to hedge, and then throw something really vague and conservative out there. At this point that's less than helpful.
[Reminder, Ags. Keep the political comments over on the Politics forum and not on this forum per WatchOle's thread stickied at the top of this page. Thanks. - Staff]
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amercer said:

Sounds like the media might be catching on:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/19/briefing/ted-cruz-texas-water-iran-nuclear.html


I'm glad they are catching on, even if they are late.

I've said it from the beginning, if all leaders would have treated the American people as adults they would have garnered a lot more trust. Instead, they told some noble lies in the beginning, and it cost them.

Anyway, I hope the messaging from this point forward improves.
One Eyed Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2 weeks after April
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Closer to right than wrong, but declaring April as a line in the sand is reminiscent of "this will all be over by Easter".

Two or three months after vaccinations start for the general public and I think we'll largely be there for broad swaths of the country - so say June or July. The denser and bluer a municipality is the further out the goalpost will be...

Now how do I get on the WSJ editorial board?
AggieOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bruce Almighty said:

Aggie95 said:

Faucci said today, 2022 before any normalcy, so I'll go with May of 2021


He's moved this date around so much now, it's hard to take him seriously anymore.
its almost like this is a new thing that no one on earth has seen before with new data coming in all the time.

nah, can't be that.

Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieOO said:

Bruce Almighty said:

Aggie95 said:

Faucci said today, 2022 before any normalcy, so I'll go with May of 2021


He's moved this date around so much now, it's hard to take him seriously anymore.
its almost like this is a new thing that no one on earth has seen before with new data coming in all the time.

nah, can't be that.




It kinda proves my point, doesn't it?
AggieOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
guess it depends on what point you were making. If you were simply saying, you can't put any stock into dates b/c data is constantly changing, then yes. But the post came across as you can't take him seriously b/c he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Perhaps it was my misinterpretation.
Dad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieOO said:

guess it depends on what point you were making. If you were simply saying, you can't put any stock into dates b/c data is constantly changing, then yes. But the post came across as you can't take him seriously b/c he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Perhaps it was my misinterpretation.

I agree that you can't predict the date of anything, but Fauci has gone on record that he lied several times and has contradicted himself many times. No masks, N95 and surgical masks work, any mask material works, two or three masks might be better, there is no evidence that two masks are better, what about pantyhose with a mask.

I don't take anything he says seriously at this point.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Closer to right than wrong, but declaring April as a line in the sand is reminiscent of "this will all be over by Easter".

Except that we have had almost a year's worth of immunity through spread and now also have a vaccine.
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is a respected scientist, though not a virologist. Hope he is right, but I think he is missing a basic point of human behavior.
We are getting to relative herd immunity among those who are living a relative normal life and aren't scared of the virus. There is a big population that has severely curtailed their activities and have stayed healthy but are vulnerable, many of whom aren't in the early vaccination phases, and when they come out of their caves we are back to square one. And 70 percent is the low end estimate, I have seen it as high as 90. April seems optimistic unless we started mandating only one dose or don't inoculate those that have had it.

Hope he is right though.
FratboyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oragator said:

He is a respected scientist, though not a virologist. Hope he is right, but I think he is missing a basic point of human behavior.
We are getting to relative herd immunity among those who are living a relative normal life and aren't scared of the virus. There is a big population that has severely curtailed their activities and have stayed healthy but are vulnerable, many of whom aren't in the early vaccination phases, and when they come out of their caves we are back to square one. And 70 percent is the low end estimate, I have seen it as high as 90. April seems optimistic unless we started mandating only one dose or don't inoculate those that have had it.

Hope he is right though.
No.

WE are on square seven or eight, collectively.

THEY (the recluses you reference) are on square one.
#CertifiedSIP
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By square one I am say if there is an outbreak because we assume herd immunity too early, everything gets shut down again, even if the numbers aren't what they are now.
And according to the CDC, as of November, only 15 percent of Americans had been exposed, so even if that's doubled in the last few months, there's a large reservoir out there to still be hit.

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/covid-2020-11-27/card/vNkshCuxwSGLw7zkSx4z

And yeah, maybe the CDC is wrong too, guess we will all see. I am not dogmatic on any POV with it, but his voice is a relative lone one, so those should not be dismissed but always be looked at more critically. And if he is right, then good news for all of us. I certainly want him to be, just seems overly optimistic.
FratboyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oragator said:

By square one I am say if there is an outbreak because we assume herd immunity too early, everything gets shut down again, even if the numbers aren't what they are now.
And according to the CDC, as of November, only 15 percent of Americans had been exposed, so even if that's doubled in the last few months, there's a large reservoir out there to still be hit.

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/covid-2020-11-27/card/vNkshCuxwSGLw7zkSx4z

And yeah, maybe the CDC is wrong too, guess we will all see. I am not dogmatic on any POV with it, but his voice is a relative lone one, so those should not be dismissed but always be looked at more critically. And if he is right, then good news for all of us. I certainly want him to be, just seems overly optimistic.
This is wrong. The November CDC estimates were far higher than that. They estimated 75-115 million people had been infected, with a best guess of 94mm IIRC
#CertifiedSIP
GiveEmHellBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dad said:

AggieOO said:

guess it depends on what point you were making. If you were simply saying, you can't put any stock into dates b/c data is constantly changing, then yes. But the post came across as you can't take him seriously b/c he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Perhaps it was my misinterpretation.

I agree that you can't predict the date of anything, but Fauci has gone on record that he lied several times and has contradicted himself many times. No masks, N95 and surgical masks work, any mask material works, two or three masks might be better, there is no evidence that two masks are better, what about pantyhose with a mask.

I don't take anything he says seriously at this point.
He is the biggest con man in the country right now. I have zero belief in anything the man says anymore.
JP_Losman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is arithmetic at some point. Hopefully Fisher doesn't cancel the spring game and we can attend. Also betting March Madness will be allowing some capacity
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JP_Losman said:

This is arithmetic at some point. Hopefully Fisher doesn't cancel the spring game and we can attend. Also betting March Madness will be allowing some capacity
I believe the decision was made by the NCAA to play the entire event in Indiana. Not sure what the logistics look like.
JP_Losman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guessing that the NCAA hasn't planned for fan attendance at this point and therefore won't be feasible to change on that. But by late March covid concerns could be minimal.

Alas we have to watch a sterile "bubble" of the best event in sports (last year none)
Ken Adams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NCAA announced up to 25% capacity at each of the 6 host sites in Indiana. All of the typical protocols will be in place.
Aust Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's close to being over in Texas at least. Almost everyone you know will have gotten out by Sunday and stood in a line for groceries or went inside a packed restaurant. People that have been getting their groceries and food by Doordash, now they'll see in the next week or so that they didn't drop dead as feared.
2wealfth Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not over according to the media; now we have all sorts of killer variants to deal with.....
cc_ag92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't do that. I ordered my groceries for pick up tomorrow. I walked into a fairly empty store yesterday for three items. I don't plan to change this strategy ever again. I am now a huge fan of ordering groceries online.

It's difficult to generalize for the entire state. I actually don't know anyone who did those things who wasn't already doing those things.

Aust Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm just saying there were alot that were, and they've been sort of "holding things back" here. Think more at a leadership level....schools, universities, etc.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aust Ag said:

I think it's close to being over in Texas at least. Almost everyone you know will have gotten out by Sunday and stood in a line for groceries or went inside a packed restaurant. People that have been getting their groceries and food by Doordash, now they'll see in the next week or so that they didn't drop dead as feared.


You know it's possible to think that it's not a good idea to be a carrier of the virus especially around those close to you and also simultaneously not believe you'll drop dead. This reductio ad absurdum bull**** is pathetic, but it seems to be the only way half of you are capable of talking about the subject. Just a reminder we've had Texags posters die drom this disease.

However, yes the pandemic is likely over. The only thing that could change that is if a variation proves to bypass all immunity and still cause equally bad health outcomes. I have seen no evidence of that, so we should be in the clear by May/June. It will just end up costing 600,000+ American lives, terrible economic damage and thankfully we have a vaccine to make the situation end without a worse outcome. People should stop trying to minimize the significance of that.
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obviously the peak is in
The cases, deaths and hospitalizations will continue to trend down. Possibly one more minor uptrend but it will quickly dissipate and the downward trend will re-establish
Old Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

Just a reminder we've had Texags posters die drom this disease.

It will just end up costing 600,000+ American lives, terrible economic damage and thankfully we have a vaccine to make the situation end without a worse outcome. People should stop trying to minimize the significance of that.


You know what else people have died from on TexAgs? Car wrecks, surgery complications, suicide, heart disease, and cancer.

Over the course of the 600,000 you quoted, there will be another 3.5m deaths from other causes.
ReloadAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now when do we get to burn these stupid face masks?
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ReloadAg said:

Now when do we get to burn these stupid face masks?


Literally whenever you want. If you're waiting for the government to give you the green light then never.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.