*** MARVEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE *** [Staff message on OP]

3,721,304 Views | 28755 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by YNWA_AG
toucan82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shutupandtakemymoney.gif
In reply to
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's a shame they won't stick with Anya as Magik; a faithful comic adaptation could have made her an incredibly popular MCU character.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are we talking about that New Mutants movie? Was it any good?
Quinn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That New Mutants movie was terrible, right? But I love that casting.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This pretty much says it all about the state of the MCU, and Disney as a whole...

YNWA_AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought there were a bunch of reports that they're moving away from Kang….or is this just their way of saying he's writing the next Avengers movie and they haven't changed the title yet?
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The super from the apartment building in "Friends" is the guy they picked?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jokershady said:

I thought there were a bunch of reports that they're moving away from Kang….or is this just their way of saying he's writing the next Avengers movie and they haven't changed the title yet?


Trusted sources said they're likely moving away from Kang, but no one knows for sure yet. All we do know is that Majors' trial begins Wednesday, and if found guilty there's obviously no way he'll be playing the part(s).
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not trying to make light of the charge, but Majors' lawyer should go with the "It wasn't him, it was a variant" defense.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

I'm not trying to make light of the charge, but Majors' lawyer should go with the "It wasn't him, it was a variant" defense.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Loki obviously has a number of variants that look just like Tom Hiddleston, but there are a number that don't and one that's an alligator...

would it really be that difficult to just recast Kang?
LPHA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jackie childs said:

So Loki obviously has a number of variants that look just like Tom Hiddleston, but there are a number that don't and one that's an alligator...

would it really be that difficult to just recast Kang?
Pretty sure Kang is a nexus being

ETA: unless I don't know what that actually means
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LPHA said:

jackie childs said:

So Loki obviously has a number of variants that look just like Tom Hiddleston, but there are a number that don't and one that's an alligator...

would it really be that difficult to just recast Kang?
Pretty sure Kang is a nexus being

ETA: unless I don't know what that actually means


He knows my credit score?
LPHA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
past, present, and future scores
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did Multiverse of Madness discuss nexus beings? I know Wanda is, but if it hasn't been brought up in movies or shows, there is no reason Marvel should have to worry about it in regards to Kang.

Honestly, they should just handle it the way they did Roadie. No one really cares. It's not like recasting Tony Stark or Steve Rogers.
LPHA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought they did in the Multiverse of Madness. Maybe the What If one
In reply to
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

jokershady said:

I thought there were a bunch of reports that they're moving away from Kang….or is this just their way of saying he's writing the next Avengers movie and they haven't changed the title yet?


Trusted sources said they're likely moving away from Kang, but no one knows for sure yet. All we do know is that Majors' trial begins Wednesday, and if found guilty there's obviously no way he'll be playing the part(s).


Luckily, Kang is a character they could realistically put in the bullpen and bring back for a future phase, potentially serving as the primary antagonist in a project like the Young Avengers. It will certainly be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
MBAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Honestly they should just let the s2 ending of Loki be the end of Kang in the MCU and move on.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Speaking of Young Adventures...given the end of The Marvels, do we think Kamala is working on her own, or has Fury's approval/guidance?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CowtownAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Everyone keeps mentioning Cheadle/Howard... isn't Ruffalo/Norton even better? MCU has been down this road before and it worked out great.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

Did Multiverse of Madness discuss nexus beings? I know Wanda is, but if it hasn't been brought up in movies or shows, there is no reason Marvel should have to worry about it in regards to Kang.

Honestly, they should just handle it the way they did Roadie. No one really cares. It's not like recasting Tony Stark or Steve Rogers.


Yep, **** can Kang or recast. This isn't a big deal and it's an easy call. I suspect most people are like me at this point and just want the multi-verse to end anyway.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

redline248 said:

Did Multiverse of Madness discuss nexus beings? I know Wanda is, but if it hasn't been brought up in movies or shows, there is no reason Marvel should have to worry about it in regards to Kang.

Honestly, they should just handle it the way they did Roadie. No one really cares. It's not like recasting Tony Stark or Steve Rogers.


Yep, **** can Kang or recast. This isn't a big deal and it's an easy call. I suspect most people are like me at this point and just want the multi-verse to end anyway.


Yup. It was a fun concept for the time travel in endgame and to tie the Spider-Man movies together. Now it's just confusing. I don't think many have too much of a vested interest.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CowtownAg06 said:

Everyone keeps mentioning Cheadle/Howard... isn't Ruffalo/Norton even better? MCU has been down this road before and it worked out great.
Was Eric Bana before or after Norton?
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MooreTrucker said:

CowtownAg06 said:

Everyone keeps mentioning Cheadle/Howard... isn't Ruffalo/Norton even better? MCU has been down this road before and it worked out great.
Was Eric Bana before or after Norton?
Before but not in the MCU.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CowtownAg06 said:

Everyone keeps mentioning Cheadle/Howard... isn't Ruffalo/Norton even better? MCU has been down this road before and it worked out great.
Howard and Norton host a MCU Podcast every week called 2 ****ing Idiots.

Seems crazy a misdemeanor case has made it this far without a deal being reached. Either he's guilty AF or her lawyer is looking for a Tony Stark level pay day.
CowtownAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Right... Bana's Hulk doesn't exist in the MCU the same way Tobey McGuire didn't before NWH (I guess this is a bad example). Ed Norton was just straight replaced by Ruffalo.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wait, all this ****storm over a freaking misdemeanor?
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just some slight face-punching.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It still blows my mind how little they tied in No Way Home, Loki, and Multiverse of Madness. (As in not at all.)

Three events that just so happen to involve multiverses, and yet all three of them happen completely independently of each other. What a coincidence.

It was a perfect opportunity to have a single massive event that causes everything.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah the lack of communication between projects is really mind-boggling. In early phase 4, I was theorizing some mini-arcs that could connect all these disparate storylines. These 3 projects lead to a Thunderbolts team-up, these 4 produce the Young Avengers, these 4 are Multiverse. Etc. Quicker payoffs, easier to see the threads.

But basically none of that has happened. And while it's probably good overall that each project focuses on itself rather than just setting up the next thing, they've kinda landed on the worst of all worlds: middling quality, setting up characters we don't have reasons to care about (Starfox, Monica Rambeau, Echo, Ironheart), and a 3-phase Saga about a tired concept that only 10% of the projects explore anyway.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm really curious how that has all happened.

Everything leading into Infinity War/Endgame was SO interconnected, then after that they just went…nah?
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They just need to whip up another set of magic stones that have existed forever but half of them wind up on 1 planet.
First Page Last Page
Page 725 of 822
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.