Entertainment
Sponsored by

*** LOVECRAFT COUNTRY *** (HBO Series)

20,836 Views | 230 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by bluefire579
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tibbers said:

Well I did not see any lead up to anything. Just saw the title and thought, "hey its lovecraft" what I was greeted with was an hour of "white people are awful" via nonsensical style. The cafe that had white painted walls and was thus representative of the white house. I mean...what?

HBO could have picked any number of shows yet they picked that at this heightened time. Its a narrative. When the credits rolled and I saw Peele's name, well, its obvious intent became known.

Further, this is a decided effort and a continuing mission to depict stories in this light.

Its sad they couldn't just tell a horror story without 90% being about race, but its expected considering the narrative.

No escapism anymore apparently.

So it's HBO's fault you didn't see the MANY trailers and commercials CLEARLY advertising this as race being its primary theme? I'm sorry, but you come across as incredibly ignorant with that statement. Never mind the fact that this whole "white people bad" convo has been had ad nauseam in this thread already. For the 400th time, "white racists bad" does not equal "white people bad." That, and, once again... no one's forcing you to watch.
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tibbers said:

Well I did not see any lead up to anything. Just saw the title and thought, "hey its lovecraft" what I was greeted with was an hour of "white people are awful" via nonsensical style. The cafe that had white painted walls and was thus representative of the white house. I mean...what?

HBO could have picked any number of shows yet they picked that at this heightened time. Its a narrative. When the credits rolled and I saw Peele's name, well, its obvious intent became known.

Further, this is a decided effort and a continuing mission to depict stories in this light.

Its sad they couldn't just tell a horror story without 90% being about race, but its expected considering the narrative.

No escapism anymore apparently.
It's based off a book that was written in 2016, optioned in 2017, piloted in 2018, and shot in 2019. They couldn't have predicted that everything going on this summer would be going on. The show follows the book, both in narrative and themes, which the major theme is using Lovecraftian motifs to represent the struggle of black Americans during segregation. I'm sorry you didn't look up what it was about beforehand, but as mentioned, the promos made that part very very clear.

And as for Jordan Peele, writing stories as a black man from a black point of view isn't race baiting. It's telling a story relevant to and important to him. From your posts, maybe it would benefit you to watch and try to understand instead of throwing a fit because racism is depicted.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wait until tibbers heard "walking in the snow" on RTJ4
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Tibbers said:

Well I did not see any lead up to anything. Just saw the title and thought, "hey its lovecraft" what I was greeted with was an hour of "white people are awful" via nonsensical style. The cafe that had white painted walls and was thus representative of the white house. I mean...what?

HBO could have picked any number of shows yet they picked that at this heightened time. Its a narrative. When the credits rolled and I saw Peele's name, well, its obvious intent became known.

Further, this is a decided effort and a continuing mission to depict stories in this light.

Its sad they couldn't just tell a horror story without 90% being about race, but its expected considering the narrative.

No escapism anymore apparently.

So it's HBO's fault you didn't see the MANY trailers and commercials CLEARLY advertising this as race being its primary theme? I'm sorry, but you come across as incredibly ignorant with that statement. Never mind the fact that this whole "white people bad" convo has been had ad nauseam in this thread already. For the 400th time, "white racists bad" does not equal "white people bad." That, and, once again... no one's forcing you to watch.


No of course not. I just saw it was on and I normally don't watch trailers as I learned long ago they either show too much or misrepresent the final product. I find it funny that you are just throwing up your hands like aw shucks at Peele's picking of this story to option. The man has made it clear on his stance towards white people. He prefers never to hire them at all unless the white person is the villain. Lets change races on that stance and see if it stands.

Listen, the show is a huge bait and switch for the majority of folk who are just cruising to see what's on. The percentage of folk who have hbo and are tuned in to all things production level like you are is lower than you think.

When the Lovecraft themes present themselves, they merely are window dressing to the main intent and thats exposure of a terrible time in our nation's history, a time that we are lifetimes away from. So why choose negativity over a positive message? Why live in that world?

I'll tell you why, I've seen it first hand in film schools. This is what they are taught. And further, if you want your show optioned you better make it about race right now.

I can't support racism, I just can't and peele is a racist.
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Double post.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You realize Peele is MARRIED to a white woman, right? Whom he has a kid with, at that.

I'm sorry, but you sound utterly unhinged. It's clear you have your point of view, and, by God, aren't going to let facts get in the way of it. One look at your posting history and it's no surprise that you spend a majority of your time on F16...
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So..... back to the show.

For those who HAVEN'T read the books, where do you think it is going? Where do you want it to go in order to redeem itself (beyond the low-budget, goosebumps stuff going away)?
mazag08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think you both have made your points and you're not going to convince one another. So let's let the thread get back to the people who enjoy the show. I haven't watched yet, but I'm getting mixed vibes. I saw one poster mention how it's planned to pick up and everything will fall in place later in the season. I might give it a try if true.
dave94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mazag08 said:

I think you both have made your points and you're not going to convince one another. So let's let the thread get back to the people who enjoy the show. I haven't watched yet, but I'm getting mixed vibes. I saw one poster mention how it's planned to pick up and everything will fall in place later in the season. I might give it a try if true.
I think it's worth two hours of your time to see if you dig it. There's some cool stuff in it, and I didn't totally hate the last episode.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mazag08 said:

I think you both have made your points and you're not going to convince one another. So let's let the thread get back to the people who enjoy the show. I haven't watched yet, but I'm getting mixed vibes. I saw one poster mention how it's planned to pick up and everything will fall in place later in the season. I might give it a try if true.

I think episode three this Sunday will tell us a lot. We've basically had two different shows the past two weeks. One that was highly acclaimed and set up a certain kind of season everyone seemed to be into, and then one that sucked and basically destroyed all the expectations it set the week prior. But we've reached a "reset" point now, and hopefully episode three gives us a clearer idea of where the rest of the season will go from here.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have any of your industry contacts said anything about what happened with episode 2? Something along the lines of "there were issues with the budget" or "the producers couldn't agree on things", etc.?
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redstone will have the details.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll look into it. However....
Showrunners, especially for a high-profile re-imagining of popular source material, tend to be a little apprehensive about giving out unreleased details.

Will report back.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Duncan Idaho said:

Redstone will have the details.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Humorous Username said:

Have any of your industry contacts said anything about what happened with episode 2? Something along the lines of "there were issues with the budget" or "the producers couldn't agree on things", etc.?
I've only heard that development apparently took a really, really long time, as the book sounds challenging to adapt, so I'm sure there were some issues there. But nothing out of the ordinary. I do know the director of episode four - she's directing Dawn for my company - but I'm not close with her and haven't spoken with her about this.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OK, seems to be some minor disagreement about direction. Is being worked through.
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought tonight's episode was better.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm 15 minutes into tonight's episode and it's taking everything I have not to bail. It's not bad, it's just so... random... and I don't care about any of it at all...
dummble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was a lot better. I think we are in for the ride, plus really looking forward to raised by wolves next weekend. And the Boys and Meateater. Man the last month has been dull once we finished umbrella
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would put it squarely between the first two episodes.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have really liked the series so far and didn't think the 2nd episode was as bad as some people thought it was. For me it as a pulpy fiction novel feel and I enjoy it. It kind of reminds me of Goosebumps books. All of those stories take place in the same universe with an overarching plot even though each story is really self contained. Without looking ahead it seems like that might be the case based on the most recent episode.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I'm out. I don't begrudge anyone for being into this, but it isn't for me. I'm just not a fan of the supernatural, goofy-but-dark-and-gory tone or the episodic nature. It really is Goosebumps meets, like, my least favorite episodes of The X-Files or something.

In this episode specifically, even if on the cheap because of the tragedy, why did Letitia buy a house in the middle of a white, clearly anti-black neighborhood? And then throw a massive party? Other than for the racial tension/drama the episode clearly needed, the logic/motivation made no sense to me. It all just felt so forced in that regard.

Also, what was the point of the whole "DAY 1" etc thing? It never led to anything, and seems like something *any* episode of any show could do, for no reason whatsoever.

Overall, I just don't understand the point of all of this. The characters have no overarching goals or aspirations. I don't know what they're after, and their dynamics aren't really all that engaging. It's just a bunch of random supernatural horror stories strung together by some so-so, somewhat passive characters, with no real narrative thrust. Which, again, is fine. I get how the episodic, horror-story-of-the-week angle can be fun, it's just not my thing.
dummble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She bought the house because the white witch needs to get the spooky pages out of the house and somehow manipulated the sister with the inheritance and realtor.

Now that the racism has become full on silly, Every white person is now a faceless enemy. No remorse when they die by the piles. Makes it way easier to mindless watch knowing who the baddies are.

I agree with your assessment that the show is devolving into more of a sci-fi/monster of the week show. I like it
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for the heads up - I saw this show hyped up and was going to check it out but not now. As far as it's wokeness - don't know if already mentioned - but the actress Jurnee Smollett is yep, Jussie's sister so I can guess the angle that gets portrayed. (She was ok in Friday Night Lights years ago)
BowSowy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big Al 1992 said:

but the actress Jurnee Smollett is yep, Jussie's sister
NO WAY
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

As far as it's wokeness - don't know if already mentioned - but the actress Jurnee Smollett is yep, Jussie's sister so I can guess the angle that gets portrayed.
I have no idea how those two things are supposed to be related, but I can pretty safely say if you're arriving at that conclusion this show would never have been for you in any case.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exactly. Don't get me wrong, I think Jussie Smollett is a lier, con artist, instigator, and above all, a massive idiot, and it's disappointing to see Jurnee defend him. But I also don't understand what that could possibly have to do with this show or its creative choices. It's a fundamental misunderstanding of how this kind of stuff comes together, and a delusional conclusion at that. Just more F16 ridiculousness, but that's par for the course at this point.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Finished ep 3 last night, and while I thought it was interesting I can get why some people aren't on board.

I think after that fantastic first ep we all assumed this would be a season long adventure sort of set up where they were trying to figure out what happened to Tic's dad, then we wrapped all that up in episode 2 in something that felt like a finale. Instead we seem to be looking at a weekly episodic format with the general theme of Tic's connection to the Braithwhites in the background.

I agree that Lettie having purchased the house seems like an odd choice without a lot of motivation, though as we saw at the end Christina seems to have orchestrated that with the money and the realtor. I like the characters in general so I'll keep watching, but definitely hoping that things start to tie back together a bit more.
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was just reading up on the book at it is actually 8 interconnected short stories. Reading it now before starting the show
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Yeah, I'm out. I don't begrudge anyone for being into this, but it isn't for me. I'm just not a fan of the supernatural, goofy-but-dark-and-gory tone or the episodic nature. It really is Goosebumps meets, like, my least favorite episodes of The X-Files or something.

In this episode specifically, even if on the cheap because of the tragedy, why did Letitia buy a house in the middle of a white, clearly anti-black neighborhood? And then throw a massive party? Other than for the racial tension/drama the episode clearly needed, the logic/motivation made no sense to me. It all just felt so forced in that regard.

Also, what was the point of the whole "DAY 1" etc thing? It never led to anything, and seems like something *any* episode of any show could do, for no reason whatsoever.

Overall, I just don't understand the point of all of this. The characters have no overarching goals or aspirations. I don't know what they're after, and their dynamics aren't really all that engaging. It's just a bunch of random supernatural horror stories strung together by some so-so, somewhat passive characters, with no real narrative thrust. Which, again, is fine. I get how the episodic, horror-story-of-the-week angle can be fun, it's just not my thing.


When you understand its only goal is to fuel a narrative of racism in America, its reason for existence becomes clear. It doesn't have to be good, HBO doesn't have to spend any money or thought, it just has to have a focus on racism. Thats why it was optioned and that's why it is airing during our current climate.

It may seem difficult to believe but it really does make sense as to why it was crafted in the first place. Yes yes, f16 craziness, but honestly, can you find a better reason?

Personally, I see it as a show made by race baiters, written by race baiters and starring an actor in a race baiting family.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
- I've talked to Misha Green, the showrunner, on two separate occasions. Once at a bar, during a writer get-together, and once in a more formal capacity, as we were considering her as a showrunner on a series I'm producing.

- I'm currently working with the director of this coming week's episode, Vic Mahoney.

- I've been to a party with Jurnee Smollett, who could not have been nicer to me.

- JJ Abrams, a Jewish white man, is a producer on this show, as is Jordan Peele, who, again, is married to a white woman, whom he has a child with.

- HBO is run by a white man named Casey Bloys, who prides himself on giving voice to a diverse slate of creatives.

In other words, I can tell you, literally from first hand experience in many of these instances, that none of these people are remotely racist, none of them have an agenda to "fuel a narrative of racism in America," and all of them happily and willingly work with white people such as myself day in and day out. The only things they are guilty of are wanting their voices heard, and using these projects as a means of catharsis, for themselves, and for the back community as a whole.

If anyone has an agenda here, it's you, as you not only come across as somewhat insane - for continually choosing to comment on a show you haven't yet seen and clearly never will - but hell bent on peddling your deranged narrative no matter what the reality is, or what evidence is presented to the contrary.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And not to state the obvious, but this show also wasn't made in the last six months. It got optioned in 2017.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exactly. Based on a book that was released before Trump was even president.
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

- I've talked to Misha Green, the showrunner, on two separate occasions. Once at a bar, during a writer get-together, and once in a more formal capacity, as we were considering her as a showrunner on a series I'm producing.

- I'm currently working with the director of this coming week's episode, Vic Mahoney.

- I've been to a party with Jurnee Smollett, who could not have been nicer to me.

- JJ Abrams, a Jewish white man, is a producer on this show, as is Jordan Peele, who, again, is married to a white woman, whom he has a child with.

- HBO is run by a white man named Casey Bloys, who prides himself on giving voice to a diverse slate of creatives.

In other words, I can tell you, literally from first hand experience in many of these instances, that none of these people are remotely racist, none of them have an agenda to "fuel a narrative of racism in America," and all of them happily and willingly work with white people such as myself day in and day out. The only things they are guilty of are wanting their voices heard, and using these projects as a means of catharsis, for themselves, and for the back community as a whole.

If anyone has an agenda here, it's you, as you not only come across as somewhat insane - for continually choosing to comment on a show you haven't yet seen and clearly never will - but hell bent on peddling your deranged narrative no matter what the reality is, or what evidence is presented to the contrary.


A book written by a white man to help pile on

I have only started reading this tonight, about 30-40 pages in but on my kindle there are already some incredibly insightful things about being black during Jim Crow that are highlighted by many others. Things once again written by a white man.
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And what happened in 2017? Fair enough. I dont doubt these folks are not mean people in person, particularly to those they would be working with in the future. That doesn't excuse their ideology or project choices.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.